Detection and interpretation of precursory magnetic signals preceding October 30, 2020 Samos earthquake

被引:0
|
作者
Ozsoz, Ilkin [1 ]
Pamukcu, Oya Ankaya [2 ]
机构
[1] Gen Directorate Mineral Res & Explorat, Ankara, Turkiye
[2] Dokuz Eylul Univ, Engn Fac, Geophys Engn, Izmir, Turkiye
关键词
Satellite magnetic data; precursory earthquake signals; Swarm satellite constellation; magnetic field components; Samos; 2020; earthquake; SWARM SATELLITES DATA; WESTERN; ATMOSPHERE; ANOMALIES; REGION; MODEL; STATE; TIME;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
P [天文学、地球科学];
学科分类号
07 ;
摘要
A major earthquake (M-w =7.0) occurred in the Samos Island on the 30th of October 2020 at 11:51 UTC. Swarm satellite magnetic data were analysed for 153 days before and 46 days after the earthquake. Preearthquake and postearthquake anomaly search is constrained within the Dobrovolsky's Circular Area. Fundamentally, there are 5 steps for processing satellite magnetic data to interpret the earthquake preparation phase. The first step is converting geographical coordinates to geomagnetic latitude and longitude. Secondly, intensity of the external magnetic field should be evaluated by magnetic indices (Ap, Kp and |Dst). Thirdly, preearthquake and postearthquake magnetic anomaly should be constrained through magnetic indices (Ap < 20, Kp <= 3 and |Dst|<10) and Dobrovolsky's Circular Area. The following step is filtering short-wavelength magnetic anomalies using first time derivative and trend removal (detrend). Finally, anomalous residual magnetic variations of the satellite tracks are classified through RMS analysis. The cumulative number of anomalous points (y-axis) is plotted versus the date (x-axis). R(2 )values denote the degree of linear distribution of the anomalous tracks. For X, Y, Z, and F components of the magnetic field, R 2 is computed as 0.9038, 0.8697, 0.8490, and 0.9694, respectively. Y component of the magnetic field provided the best results in terms of interpretation. Regarding the results of the Y component, linear distribution and deviation from this distribution are fairly distinguishable.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Emergency response, intervention, and societal recovery in Greece and Turkey after the 30th October 2020, MW = 7.0, Samos (Aegean Sea) earthquake
    S. Mavroulis
    M. Ilgac
    M. Tunçağ
    E. Lekkas
    S. Püskülcü
    A. Kourou
    A. Sextos
    M. Mavrouli
    G. Can
    T. Thoma
    M. Manousaki
    N. Karveleas
    Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering, 2022, 20 : 7933 - 7955
  • [42] Emergency response, intervention, and societal recovery in Greece and Turkey after the 30th October 2020, MW=7.0, Samos (Aegean Sea) earthquake
    Mavroulis, S.
    Ilgac, M.
    Tunca, M.
    Lekkas, E.
    Puskulcu, S.
    Kourou, A.
    Sextos, A.
    Mavrouli, M.
    Can, G.
    Thoma, T.
    Manousaki, M.
    Karveleas, N.
    BULLETIN OF EARTHQUAKE ENGINEERING, 2022, 20 (14) : 7933 - 7955
  • [43] Effects of seismic activity on groundwater level and geothermal systems in İzmir, Western Anatolia, Turkey: the case study from October 30, 2020 Samos Earthquake
    Uzelli, Taygun
    Bilgic, Esra
    Ozturk, Bahadir
    Baba, Alper
    Sozbilir, Hasan
    Tatar, Orhan
    TURKISH JOURNAL OF EARTH SCIENCES, 2021, 30 (08)
  • [44] Co-seismic and post-seismic deformation, field observations and fault model of the 30 October 2020 Mw = 7.0 Samos earthquake, Aegean Sea
    Athanassios Ganas
    Panagiotis Elias
    Pierre Briole
    Sotiris Valkaniotis
    Javier Escartin
    Varvara Tsironi
    Ilektra Karasante
    Chrysanthi Kosma
    Acta Geophysica, 2021, 69 : 999 - 1024
  • [45] Numerical modelling of sub-ionospheric Very Low Frequency radio signal anomalies during the Samos (Greece) earthquake (M=6.9) on October 30, 2020
    Biswas, Sagardweep
    Chowdhury, Swati
    Sasmal, Sudipta
    Politis, Dimitrios Z.
    Potirakis, Stelios M.
    Hayakawa, Masashi
    ADVANCES IN SPACE RESEARCH, 2022, 70 (05) : 1453 - 1471
  • [46] Simulation of Strong Ground Motions From the October 30, 2020, Samos Earthquake and Validations Against Observed Records, Intensity Distributions, and Damages in Izmir, Türkiye
    Karimzadeh, Shaghayegh
    Askan, Aysegul
    JOURNAL OF EARTHQUAKE AND TSUNAMI, 2024, 18 (05)
  • [47] Co-seismic and post-seismic deformation, field observations and fault model of the 30 October 2020 Mw=7.0 Samos earthquake, Aegean Sea
    Ganas, Athanassios
    Elias, Panagiotis
    Briole, Pierre
    Valkaniotis, Sotiris
    Escartin, Javier
    Tsironi, Varvara
    Karasante, Ilektra
    Kosma, Chrysanthi
    ACTA GEOPHYSICA, 2021, 69 (03) : 999 - 1024
  • [48] The role of site effects on elevated seismic demands and corollary structural damage during the October 30, 2020, M7.0 Samos Island (Aegean Sea) Earthquake
    Kemal Onder Cetin
    Achilleas G. Papadimitriou
    Selim Altun
    Panagiotis Pelekis
    Berna Unutmaz
    Emmanouil Rovithis
    Mustafa Akgun
    Nikolaos Klimis
    Aysegul Askan
    Katerina Ziotopoulou
    Alper Sezer
    Cem Kincal
    Makbule Ilgac
    Gizem Can
    Elife Cakir
    Berkan Soylemez
    Ahmed Al-Suhaily
    Alaa Elsaid
    Moutasem Zarzour
    Jonathan Stewart
    George Mylonakis
    Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering, 2022, 20 : 7763 - 7792
  • [49] Preface for the Special Issue οn the M7.0 Samos Island (Aegean Sea) earthquake of 30th October 2020: reconnaissance missions and first observations
    Sextos, Anastasios
    Cetin, Kemal Onder
    Mylonakis, George
    Stewart, Jonathan P.
    BULLETIN OF EARTHQUAKE ENGINEERING, 2022, 20 (14) : 7705 - 7706
  • [50] THE EFFECT OF THE AEGEAN SEA EARTHQUAKE, OCCURRED ON OCTOBER 30, 2020, ON TUSAGA STATIONS
    Gundogan, Tunahan
    Bulbul, Sercan
    Inal, Cevat
    KONYA JOURNAL OF ENGINEERING SCIENCES, 2023, 11 (04):