E-learning in transfusion medicine: An exploratory qualitative assessment

被引:0
|
作者
Al-Riyami, Arwa Z. [1 ]
Jensen, Kyle [2 ]
So-Osman, Cynthia [3 ,4 ]
Saxon, Ben [5 ]
Rahimi-Levene, Naomi [6 ]
Das, Soumya [7 ]
Stanworth, Simon J. [8 ,9 ]
Lin, Yulia [10 ]
机构
[1] Univ Med City, Sultan Qaboos Univ Hosp, Dept Haematol, POB 38, Muscat 123, Oman
[2] Australian Red Cross Lifeblood, Res & Dev, Brisbane, Qld, Australia
[3] Sanquin Blood Supply Fdn, Unit Transfus Med, Amsterdam, Netherlands
[4] Erasmus MC, Dept Haematol, Rotterdam, Netherlands
[5] Womens & Childrens Hosp, Dept Haematol & Oncol, Adelaide, Australia
[6] Ariel Univ, Shamir Med Ctr, Adelson Sch Med, Blood Bank,Zerifin, Ariel, Israel
[7] All India Inst Med Sci AIIMS, Dept Transfus Med, Nagpur, India
[8] Univ Oxford, Oxford Univ Hosp NHS Trust, NHSBT, Oxford, England
[9] ICTMG, Oxford, England
[10] Univ Toronto, Qual Utilizat Educ & Safety Transfus QUEST Res Pro, Sunnybrook Hlth Sci Ctr, Toronto, ON, Canada
关键词
E-learning; online education; transfusion;
D O I
10.1111/vox.13682
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background and ObjectivesE-learning programmes are increasingly offered in transfusion medicine (TM) education. The aim of this study was to explore facilitators and barriers to TM e-learning programmes, including assessment of learning outcomes and measures of effectiveness.Materials and MethodsParticipants selected from a prior survey and representing a diverse number of international e-learning programmes were invited to participate. A mixed methodology was employed, combining a survey and individual semi-structured one-on-one interviews. Interview data were analysed inductively to explore programme development, evaluation, and facilitators and barriers to implementation.ResultsFourteen participants representing 13 institutions participated in the survey and 10 were interviewed. The e-learning programmes have been in use for a variable duration between 5 and 16 years. Funding sources varied, including government and institutional support. Learner assessment methods varied and encompassed multiple-choice-questions (n = 12), direct observation (n = 4) and competency assessment (n = 4). Most regional and national blood collection agencies rely on user feedback and short-term learning assessments to evaluate their programmes. Only one respondent indicated an attempt to correlate e-learning with clinical practices. Factors that facilitated programme implementation included support from management and external audits to ensure compliance with regulatory educational and training requirements. Barriers to programme implementation included the allocation of staff time for in-house development, enforcing compliance, keeping educational content up-to-date and gaining access to outcome data for educational providers.ConclusionThere is evidence of considerable diversity in the evaluation of e-learning programmes. Further work is needed to understand the ultimate impact of TM e-learning on transfusion practices and patient outcomes.
引用
收藏
页码:842 / 850
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Charisma building in the e-learning classroom: an exploratory study
    Fu, Fong-Ling Linda
    Lin, Chien-Liang
    Ting, Chia-jen
    INTERNATIONAL EDUCATIONAL TECHNOLOGY CONFERENCE, IETC 2014, 2015, 176 : 683 - 690
  • [22] Potential and limitations of e-learning in emergency medicine
    Roe, David
    Carley, Simon
    Sherratt, Cathy
    EMERGENCY MEDICINE JOURNAL, 2010, 27 (02) : 100 - 104
  • [23] The universities, the Faculty of Medicine and the challenge of e-learning
    Masoni, Marco
    Guelfi, Maria Renza
    Conti, Antonio
    Gensini, Gian Franco
    CLINICAL MANAGEMENT ISSUES, 2009, 3 (04) : 135 - 138
  • [24] Satisfaction with asynchronous e-learning: An exploratory factor analysis of the Learner Satisfaction with Asynchronous e-Learning (LSAeL) instrument
    Sinclair, Peter M.
    Kable, Ashly
    Oldmeadow, Christopher J.
    Wilson, Amanda
    NURSE EDUCATION IN PRACTICE, 2024, 75
  • [25] Covid-19 and E-Learning: An Exploratory Analysis of Research Topics and Interests in E-Learning During the Pandemic
    Gurcan, Fatih
    Dalveren, Gonca Gokce Menekse
    Derawi, Mohammad
    IEEE ACCESS, 2022, 10 : 123349 - 123357
  • [26] The direct design and assessment of e-Learning
    Dempsey, Jack
    Litchfield, Brenda
    2ND INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON E-LEARNING, PROCEEDINGS, 2007, : 131 - 138
  • [27] MEASURES FOR USAGE ASSESSMENT IN E-LEARNING
    Valsamidis, S.
    Kontogiannis, S.
    Kazanidis, I.
    Karakos, A.
    EDULEARN12: 4TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON EDUCATION AND NEW LEARNING TECHNOLOGIES, 2012, : 7313 - 7318
  • [28] An e-learning framework for assessment (FREMA)
    Wills, Gary B.
    Bailey, Christopher P.
    Davis, Hugh C.
    Gilbert, Lester
    Howard, Yvonne
    Jeyes, Steve
    Millard, David E.
    Price, Joseph
    Sclater, Niall
    Sherratt, Robert
    Tulloch, Iain
    Young, Rowin
    ASSESSMENT & EVALUATION IN HIGHER EDUCATION, 2009, 34 (03) : 273 - 292
  • [29] Assessment of an e-learning platform for dermatosurgery
    Schneider, Hanna
    Huebers, Corinne
    Benecke, Johannes
    Reiners-Koch, Philipp-Sebastian
    Felcht, Moritz
    DERMATOLOGIE, 2022, 73 (12): : 943 - 951
  • [30] Assessment of an e-learning platform for dermatosurgery
    Huebers, C.
    Schneider, H.
    Benecke, J.
    Reiners-Koch, P. S.
    Felcht, M.
    JOURNAL DER DEUTSCHEN DERMATOLOGISCHEN GESELLSCHAFT, 2022, 20 : 64 - 65