A Quantitative Analysis of the Uncertainties on Reconnection Electric Field Estimates Using Ionospheric Measurements

被引:1
|
作者
Gasparini, S. [1 ]
Hatch, S. M. [1 ]
Reistad, J. P. [1 ]
Ohma, A. [1 ]
Laundal, K. M. [1 ]
Walker, S. J. [1 ]
Madelaire, M. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Bergen, Dept Phys & Technol, Bergen, Norway
关键词
reconnection electric fields; open-closed boundary; ionospheric conductance; Hall conductance; Pedersen conductance; HIGH-LATITUDE IONOSPHERE; MAGNETIC-FIELD; IMAGE-FUV; CURRENT SYSTEMS; LINE BOUNDARY; SUPERDARN; CONVECTION; CURRENTS; ENERGY; ELECTRODYNAMICS;
D O I
10.1029/2024JA032599
中图分类号
P1 [天文学];
学科分类号
0704 ;
摘要
Calculating the magnetic flux transfer across the open-closed boundary (OCB) per unit time and distance-the reconnection electric field-is an important means of remotely monitoring magnetospheric dynamics. Ground-based measurements of plasma convection velocities together with velocities of the OCB are commonly used to infer reconnection rates. However, this approach is limited by spatial coverage and often lacks robust uncertainty quantification. In this paper, we assimilate Super Dual Auroral Radar Network convection measurements, ground magnetometer data, and estimates of the conductance derived from the Imager for Magnetopause-to-Aurora Global Exploration satellite imagers, using the Local mapping of polar ionospheric electrodynamics (Lompe) framework over a region in North America. We present a new method to assess various contributions to uncertainties in the derived reconnection electric fields, including a novel approach to estimate uncertainties in conductance from global auroral imaging. Our method is demonstrated on a substorm event with an associated pseudobreakup during a period of favorable observational coverage. In this case study, the uncertainties in the reconnection electric field are similar to 5-10 mV/m at the peak of substorm expansion, roughly 15% of the peak reconnection electric field. We find that the main contributor to the reconnection electric field estimates after substorm onset is the OCB motion, whereas during the pseudobreakup the main contributor is ionospheric plasma convection. The solar wind is a stream of particles and magnetic field flowing away from the Sun. Under certain orientations of the solar wind magnetic field, magnetic reconnection can occur between the magnetic fields of the solar wind and Earth. Magnetic reconnection is the process by which oppositely directed magnetic field lines "break," then merge into a new configuration. Magnetic reconnection is the primary process responsible for coupling the solar wind energy to the Earth's magnetic field, and is ultimately the principal driver of space weather. In the Earth's magnetosphere, reconnection is associated with topological changes at both dayside and nightside, where stored magnetic energy is released through a global reconfiguration of the magnetosphere which is referred to as magnetospheric substorms. We can remotely monitor this reconnection from the ground by studying the transfer of magnetic flux across the boundary between open and closed magnetic field lines. In this study, we combined data from ground-based radars, ground magnetometers, and space-based auroral imaging to monitor the reconnection rate across the entire nightside auroral oval for a full substorm event. We additionally derived uncertainties in this reconnection rate stemming from uncertainties in the ionospheric velocities, the ionospheric conductances, and the open-closed boundary motion. We estimate Hall and Pedersen conductance uncertainties using global auroral satellite images from Imager for Magnetopause-to-Aurora Global Exploration (IMAGE) for an isolated substorm We calculate uncertainties in ionospheric reconnection electric fields related to conductance, open-closed boundary (OCB) motion, and convection We find that the main contributor to the reconnection electric field estimates after onset is the OCB motion
引用
收藏
页数:27
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Estimation of Ionospheric Reflection Heights Using CG and IC Lightning Electric Field Waveforms
    Leal, A. F. R.
    Rakov, V. A.
    Rocha, B. R. P.
    2017 INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON LIGHTNING PROTECTION (XIV SIPDA), 2017, : 212 - 217
  • [42] Novel analysis of a sudden ionospheric disturbance using Schumann resonance measurements
    Dyrda, Michal
    Kulak, Andrzej
    Mlynarczyk, Janusz
    Ostrowski, Michal
    JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH-SPACE PHYSICS, 2015, 120 (03) : 2255 - 2262
  • [43] Statistical Analysis of the Main Ionospheric Trough Using Swarm in Situ Measurements
    Aa, Ercha
    Zou, Shasha
    Erickson, Philip J.
    Zhang, Shun-Rong
    Liu, Siqing
    JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH-SPACE PHYSICS, 2020, 125 (03)
  • [44] Quantitative analysis of hydrophobicity loss due to electric field strength
    Temmen, K
    Khaddour, A
    Peier, D
    ICSD '01: PROCEEDINGS OF THE 2001 IEEE 7TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON SOLID DIELECTRICS, 2001, : 341 - 344
  • [45] Analysis of Ionospheric Spatial Gradient Over Korea Using GPS Measurements
    Jeong, Myeong-Sook
    Kim, Jeong-Rae
    KOREAN JOURNAL OF REMOTE SENSING, 2009, 25 (05) : 391 - 398
  • [46] PARTICLE DIFFUSION IN THE GEOMAGNETOSPHERE - COMPARISON OF ESTIMATES FROM MEASUREMENTS OF MAGNETIC AND ELECTRIC-FIELD FLUCTUATIONS
    LANZEROTTI, LJ
    WOLFE, A
    JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH-SPACE PHYSICS, 1980, 85 (NA5): : 2346 - 2348
  • [47] Identification of Overhead Lines Using Measurements of the Electric Field Strength
    Henze, C.
    Bauer, H.
    2009 20TH INTERNATIONAL ZURICH SYMPOSIUM ON ELECTROMAGNETIC COMPATIBILITY, 2009, : 105 - 108
  • [48] On the influence of uncertainties in scattering potentials on quantitative analysis using keV ions
    Bruckner, Barbara
    Strapko, Tomas
    Sortica, Mauricio A.
    Bauer, Peter
    Primetzhofer, Daniel
    NUCLEAR INSTRUMENTS & METHODS IN PHYSICS RESEARCH SECTION B-BEAM INTERACTIONS WITH MATERIALS AND ATOMS, 2020, 470 (470): : 21 - 27
  • [49] Ionospheric conductances and currents of amorning sector auroral arc from Swarm-A electric and magnetic field measurements
    Juusola, L.
    Archer, W. E.
    Kauristie, K.
    Burchill, J. K.
    Vanhamaki, H.
    Aikio, A. T.
    GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH LETTERS, 2016, 43 (22) : 11519 - 11527
  • [50] LARGE AREA DISTRIBUTION OF IONOSPHERIC ELECTRIC-FIELD FROM CHATANIKA INCOHERENT-SCATTER RADAR MEASUREMENTS
    DOUPNIK, JR
    BANKS, PM
    TRANSACTIONS-AMERICAN GEOPHYSICAL UNION, 1975, 56 (09): : 622 - 622