Comparison of refined and code-compliant modelling strategies for the seismic analysis of unreinforced masonry buildings

被引:1
|
作者
Bracchi, Stefano [1 ]
Rota, Maria [2 ]
Penna, Andrea [3 ]
机构
[1] EUCENTRE Fdn, Dept Bldg & Infrastruct, Via Ferrata 1, I-27100 Pavia, Italy
[2] EUCENTRE Fdn, Dept Ind Prod, Via Ferrata 1, I-27100 Pavia, Italy
[3] Univ Pavia, Dept Civil Engn & Architecture, Via Ferrata 3, I-27100 Pavia, Italy
关键词
unreinforced masonry; nonlinear analysis; equivalent-frame models; wall analysis; flexible floors;
D O I
10.1016/j.prostr.2023.01.058
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
When performing the seismic analysis of existing unreinforced masonry buildings, flexible diaphragms are often present. In case the flexibility of these elements is particularly significant, the execution of meaningful pushover analyses with fixed load pattern, performed on a three-dimensional model of the structure, is widely recognized to be problematic and tends to provide information only on the failure condition of the weakest wall. Thus, single bidimensional models of each structural wall are usually required and separated pushover analyses are carried out on each of them. In this paper, different modelling strategies to model single walls and entire buildings to perform nonlinear seismic analysis, are compared. In particular, simplified approaches included in current building codes are compared with more refined approaches, to find out the main differences among code-compliant and advanced models and highlight possible weaknesses of code-compliant strategies. (c) 2023 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V.
引用
收藏
页码:442 / 449
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Methodology for practical seismic assessment of unreinforced masonry buildings with historical value
    Pardalopoulos, Stylianos I.
    Pantazopoulou, Stavroula J.
    EARTHQUAKE ENGINEERING & STRUCTURAL DYNAMICS, 2017, 46 (15): : 2793 - 2810
  • [42] Experimental analysis of airtightness performance in high-rise residential buildings for improved code-compliant simulations
    Hong, Goopyo
    Kim, Chul
    ENERGY AND BUILDINGS, 2022, 261
  • [43] Editorial of the Special Issue "Seismic Vulnerability and Strengthening of Unreinforced Masonry Buildings"
    Formisano, Antonio
    Sorrentino, Luigi
    Zucconi, Maria
    GEOSCIENCES, 2023, 13 (03)
  • [44] Is Modal Pushover Analysis accurate in estimating seismic demands for unreinforced masonry buildings with flexible diaphragms?
    Nakamura, Y.
    Derakhshan, H.
    Griffith, M. C.
    Magenes, G.
    BRICK AND BLOCK MASONRY: TRENDS, INNOVATIONS AND CHALLENGES, 2016, : 269 - 273
  • [45] Seismic loss assessment of code-compliant moment-resisting RC buildings located on different soil conditions of Mexico City
    Valenzuela-Beltran, Federico
    Gaxiola-Camacho, J. Ramon
    Llanes-Tizoc, Mario D.
    Baca, Victor
    Leal-Graciano, J. M.
    Reyes-Salazar, Alfredo
    ENGINEERING STRUCTURES, 2024, 300
  • [46] Modelling of in-plane strengthening of unreinforced masonry buildings: a numerical comparison between traditional and FRCM jacketing
    Sbrogio, Luca
    Saretta, Ylenia
    Valluzzi, Maria Rosa
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MASONRY RESEARCH AND INNOVATION, 2024, 9 (1-2) : 96 - 125
  • [47] Assessment of Potential Seismic Damage to Residential Unreinforced Masonry Buildings in Northern Illinois
    Khudeira, Soliman
    Mohammadi, Jamshid
    PRACTICE PERIODICAL ON STRUCTURAL DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION, 2006, 11 (02) : 93 - 97
  • [48] Seismic Fragility Curves for Unreinforced Masonry Buildings in Korea Based on Component Damage
    Ahn, Sook-Jin
    Park, Ji-Hun
    Kim, Hye-Won
    JOURNAL OF EARTHQUAKE ENGINEERING, 2025, 29 (03) : 755 - 790
  • [49] A new discrete element model for the evaluation of the seismic behaviour of unreinforced masonry buildings
    Calio, Ivo
    Marletta, Massimo
    Panto, Bartolomeo
    ENGINEERING STRUCTURES, 2012, 40 : 327 - 338
  • [50] Seismic Retrofitting for Chord Reinforcement for Unreinforced Masonry Historic Buildings with Flexible Diaphragms
    Hsiao, J. Kent
    Tezcan, Jale
    PRACTICE PERIODICAL ON STRUCTURAL DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION, 2012, 17 (03) : 102 - 109