Incremental Benefit fi t of Stepwise Nonpulmonary Vein Trigger Provocation During Catheter Ablation of Atrial Fibrillation

被引:1
|
作者
Oraii, Alireza [1 ]
Chaumont, Corentin [1 ]
Rodriguez-Queralto, Oriol [1 ]
Petzl, Adrian [1 ]
Zado, Erica [1 ]
Markman, Timothy M. [1 ]
Hyman, Matthew C. [1 ]
Tschabrunn, Cory M. [1 ]
Enriquez, Andres [1 ]
Shivamurthy, Poojita [1 ]
Kumareswaran, Ramanan [1 ]
Riley, Michael P. [1 ]
Lin, David [1 ]
Supple, Gregory E. [1 ]
Garcia, Fermin C. [1 ]
Schaller, Robert D. [1 ]
Nazarian, Saman [1 ]
Frankel, David S. [1 ]
Dixit, Sanjay [1 ]
Callans, David J. [1 ]
Marchlinski, Francis E. [1 ]
机构
[1] Hosp Univ Penn, Dept Med, Div Cardiovasc Med, Sect Cardiac Electrophysiol, Philadelphia, PA USA
关键词
atrial fi brillation; catheter ablation; isoproterenol; non-pulmonary vein trigger; provocation; ADENOSINE; ISOPROTERENOL; CONDUCTION; INITIATION; FOCI;
D O I
10.1016/j.jacep.2024.06.005
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
BACKGROUND The importance of nonpulmonary vein (PV) triggers for the initiation/recurrence of atrial fibrillation (AF) is well established. OBJECTIVES This study sought to assess the incremental benefit of provocative maneuvers for identifying non-PV triggers. METHODS We included consecutive patients undergoing first-time AF ablation between 2020 and 2022. The provocation protocol included step 1, identification of spontaneous non-PV triggers after cardioversion of AF and/or during sinus rhythm; step 2, isoproterenol infusion (3, 6, 12, and 20-30 m g/min); and step 3, atrial burst pacing to induce AF followed by cardioversion during residual or low-dose isoproterenol infusion or induce focal atrial tachycardia. Non-PV triggers were defined as non-PV ectopic beats triggering AF or sustained focal atrial tachycardia. RESULTS Of 1,372 patients included, 883 (64.4%) underwent the complete stepwise provocation protocol with isoproterenol infusion and burst pacing, 334 (24.3%) isoproterenol infusion only, 77 (5.6%) burst pacing only, and 78 (5.7%) no provocative maneuvers (only step 1). Overall, 161 non-PV triggers were found in 135 (9.8%) patients. Of these, 51 (31.7%) non-PV triggers occurred spontaneously, and the remaining 110 (68.3%) required provocative maneuvers for induction. Among those receiving the complete stepwise provocation protocol, there was a 2.2-fold increase in the number of patients with non-PV triggers after isoproterenol infusion, and the addition of burst pacing after isoproterenol infusion led to a total increase of 3.6-fold with the complete stepwise provocation protocol. CONCLUSIONS The majority of non-PV triggers require provocative maneuvers for induction. A stepwise provocation protocol consisting of isoproterenol infusion followed by burst pacing identifies a 3.6-fold higher number of patients with non-PV triggers. (JACC Clin Electrophysiol 2024;10:1648-1659) (c) 2024 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation.
引用
收藏
页码:1648 / 1659
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Entrapment of a circular mapping catheter in a pulmonary vein during atrial fibrillation ablation
    Nico Reinsch
    Jochen Buchholz
    Ute Ruprecht
    Kars Neven
    Journal of Interventional Cardiac Electrophysiology, 2019, 54 : 91 - 92
  • [22] Acute pulmonary vein stenosis during radiofrequency catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation
    Yakabe, Daisuke
    Araki, Masahiro
    Inoue, Shujiro
    Nakamura, Toshihiro
    JOURNAL OF ARRHYTHMIA, 2023, : 960 - 962
  • [23] Do we need assessment of nonpulmonary vein triggers for successful ablation of atrial fibrillation?
    Wichterle, Dan
    FUTURE CARDIOLOGY, 2013, 9 (04) : 471 - 474
  • [24] Atrial fibrillation ablation: Limitations of pulmonary vein ablation catheter technology
    Wojcik, Maciej
    Berkowitsch, Alexander
    Kuniss, Malte
    Neumann, Thomas
    CARDIOLOGY JOURNAL, 2014, 21 (05) : 583 - 583
  • [25] Catheter Ablation for Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation Time to Focus More on Trigger Ablation?
    Kumar, Saurabh
    Michaud, Gregory F.
    CIRCULATION-ARRHYTHMIA AND ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY, 2016, 9 (05):
  • [26] The incremental benefit of non-pulmonary vein left atrial ablation in patients undergoing a repeat persistent atrial fibrillation ablation procedure
    Goldenberg, Gustavo R.
    Ono, Masa
    Aryana, Arash
    d'Avila, Andre
    Saad, Eduardo B.
    Singh, Steve K.
    Singh, Sheldon M.
    JOURNAL OF INTERVENTIONAL CARDIAC ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY, 2017, 48 (02) : 185 - 191
  • [27] The incremental benefit of non-pulmonary vein left atrial ablation in patients undergoing a repeat persistent atrial fibrillation ablation procedure
    Gustavo R. Goldenberg
    Masa Ono
    Arash Aryana
    Andre d’Avila
    Eduardo B. Saad
    Steve K. Singh
    Sheldon M. Singh
    Journal of Interventional Cardiac Electrophysiology, 2017, 48 : 185 - 191
  • [28] Significant Benefit of Uninterrupted DOACs Versus VKA During Catheter Ablation of Atrial Fibrillation
    Romero, Jorge
    Cerrud-Rodriguez, Roberto C.
    Alviz, Isabella
    Diaz, Juan Carlos
    Rodriguez, Daniel
    Arshad, Samiullah
    Cerna, Luis
    Taveras, Jose
    Grupposo, Vito
    Natale, Andrea
    Garcia, Mario
    Di Biase, Luigi
    JACC-CLINICAL ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY, 2019, 5 (12) : 1396 - 1405
  • [29] Pulmonary vein stenosis following catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation
    Pürerfellner, H
    Martinek, M
    CURRENT OPINION IN CARDIOLOGY, 2005, 20 (06) : 484 - 490
  • [30] Pulmonary vein stenosis after catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation
    Robbins, IM
    Colvin, EV
    Doyle, TP
    Kemp, WE
    Loyd, JE
    McMahon, WS
    Kay, GN
    CIRCULATION, 1998, 98 (17) : 1769 - 1775