Assessing methane emissions from collapsing Venezuelan oil production using TROPOMI

被引:1
|
作者
Nathan, Brian [1 ]
Maasakkers, Joannes D. [1 ]
Naus, Stijn [1 ]
Gautam, Ritesh [2 ]
Omara, Mark [2 ]
Varon, Daniel J. [3 ]
Sulprizio, Melissa P. [3 ]
Estrada, Lucas A. [3 ]
Lorente, Alba [1 ]
Borsdorff, Tobias [1 ]
Parker, Robert J. [4 ,5 ]
Aben, Ilse [1 ,6 ]
机构
[1] SRON Netherlands Inst Space Res, Leiden, Netherlands
[2] Environm Def Fund, Washington, DC USA
[3] Harvard Univ, Sch Engn & Appl Sci, Cambridge, MA USA
[4] Univ Leicester, Natl Ctr Earth Observat, Leicester, England
[5] Univ Leicester, Sch Phys & Astron, Earth Observat Sci, Leicester, England
[6] Vrije Univ Amsterdam, Dept Earth Sci, Amsterdam, Netherlands
基金
英国自然环境研究理事会;
关键词
ATMOSPHERIC METHANE; GLOBAL DISTRIBUTION; SATELLITE DATA; RESOLUTION; INVENTORY; INVERSION; GAS; CLIMATE; WETLAND; SYSTEM;
D O I
10.5194/acp-24-6845-2024
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Venezuela has long been identified as an area with large methane emissions and intensive oil exploitation, especially in the Lake Maracaibo region, but production has strongly decreased in recent years. The area is notoriously difficult to observe from space due to its complex topography and persistent cloud cover. We use the unprecedented coverage of the TROPOspheric Monitoring Instrument (TROPOMI) methane observations in analytical inversions with the Integrated Methane Inversion (IMI) framework at the national scale and at the local scale with the Weather Research and Forecasting model with chemistry (WRF-Chem). In the IMI analysis, we find Venezuelan emissions of 7.5 (5.7-9.3) Tg a - 1 in 2019, where about half of emissions can be informed by TROPOMI observations, and emissions from oil exploitation are a factor of similar to 1.6 higher than in bottom-up inventories. Using WRF, we find emissions of 1.2 (1.0-1.5) Tg a - 1 from the Lake Maracaibo area in 2019, close to bottom-up estimates. Our WRF estimate is similar to 40 % lower than the result over the same region from the IMI due to differences in the meteorology used by the two models. We find only a small, non-significant trend in emissions between 2018 and 2020 around the lake, implying the area's methane emission intensity expressed against oil and gas production has doubled over the time period, to similar to 20 %. This value is much higher than what has previously been found for other oil and gas production regions and indicates that there could be large emissions from abandoned infrastructure.
引用
收藏
页码:6845 / 6863
页数:19
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Methane emissions from oil and gas platforms in the North Sea
    Riddick, Stuart N.
    Mauzerall, Denise L.
    Celia, Michael
    Harris, Neil R. P.
    Allen, Grant
    Pitt, Joseph
    Staunton-Sykes, John
    Forster, Grant L.
    Kang, Mary
    Lowry, David
    Nisbet, Euan G.
    Manning, Alistair J.
    ATMOSPHERIC CHEMISTRY AND PHYSICS, 2019, 19 (15) : 9787 - 9796
  • [42] Methane emissions from abandoned oil and gas wells in Colorado
    Riddick, Stuart N.
    Mbua, Mercy
    Santos, Arthur
    Emerson, Ethan W.
    Cheptonui, Fancy
    Houlihan, Cade
    Hodshire, Anna L.
    Anand, Abhinav
    Hartzell, Wendy
    Zimmerle, Daniel J.
    SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT, 2024, 922
  • [43] Closing the methane gap in US oil and natural gas production emissions inventories
    Rutherford, Jeffrey S.
    Sherwin, Evan D.
    Ravikumar, Arvind P.
    Heath, Garvin A.
    Englander, Jacob
    Cooley, Daniel
    Lyon, David
    Omara, Mark
    Langfitt, Quinn
    Brandt, Adam R.
    NATURE COMMUNICATIONS, 2021, 12 (01)
  • [44] Closing the methane gap in US oil and natural gas production emissions inventories
    Jeffrey S. Rutherford
    Evan D. Sherwin
    Arvind P. Ravikumar
    Garvin A. Heath
    Jacob Englander
    Daniel Cooley
    David Lyon
    Mark Omara
    Quinn Langfitt
    Adam R. Brandt
    Nature Communications, 12
  • [45] Estimating fugitive methane emissions from oil sands mining using extractive core samples
    Johnson, Matthew R.
    Crosland, Brian M.
    McEwen, James D.
    Hager, Darcy B.
    Armitage, Joshua R.
    Karimi-Golpayegani, Mojgan
    Picard, David J.
    ATMOSPHERIC ENVIRONMENT, 2016, 144 : 111 - 123
  • [46] Assessing methane emissions from global space-borne observations
    Frankenberg, C
    Meirink, JF
    van Weele, M
    Platt, U
    Wagner, T
    SCIENCE, 2005, 308 (5724) : 1010 - 1014
  • [47] Satellite quantification of methane emissions from South American countries: a high-resolution inversion of TROPOMI and GOSAT observations
    Hancock, Sarah E.
    Jacob, Daniel J.
    Chen, Zichong
    Nesser, Hannah
    Davitt, Aaron
    Varon, Daniel J.
    Sulprizio, Melissa P.
    Balasus, Nicholas
    Estrada, Lucas A.
    Cazorla, Maria
    Dawidowski, Laura
    Diez, Sebastian
    East, James D.
    Penn, Elise
    Randles, Cynthia A.
    Worden, John
    Aben, Ilse
    Parker, Robert J.
    Maasakkers, Joannes D.
    ATMOSPHERIC CHEMISTRY AND PHYSICS, 2025, 25 (02) : 797 - 817
  • [48] Assessing the methane production from leachate and deodoriser by using a batch test of anaerobic digestion
    Tohir, Siti Amirah Mohd
    Yeol, Lee Dong
    Wahid, Marfiah Ab.
    Kamal, Norashikin Ahmad
    International Journal of Environmental Engineering, 2020, 10 (04) : 317 - 328
  • [49] Temporal Variation and Persistence of Methane Emissions from Shallow Water-Oil and Gas Production in the Gulf of Mexico
    Biener, Kira J.
    Negron, Alan M. Gorchov
    Kort, Eric A.
    Ayasse, Alana K.
    Chen, Yuanlei
    Maclean, Jean-Philippe
    Mckeever, Jason
    ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY, 2024, 58 (11) : 4948 - 4956
  • [50] Quantifying atmospheric methane emissions from oil and natural gas production in the Bakken shale region of North Dakota
    Peischl, J.
    Karion, A.
    Sweeney, C.
    Kort, E. A.
    Smith, M. L.
    Brandt, A. R.
    Yeskoo, T.
    Aikin, K. C.
    Conley, S. A.
    Gvakharia, A.
    Trainer, M.
    Wolter, S.
    Ryerson, T. B.
    JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH-ATMOSPHERES, 2016, 121 (10) : 6101 - 6111