Comparison of Cognitive Impairment Diagnosis Criteria in Clinical Settings: Conventional vs. Neuropsychological

被引:0
|
作者
Kim, Hye-Geum [1 ,2 ]
Kim, Younggyo [3 ]
Edmonds, Emily C. [4 ,5 ,6 ]
Bondi, Mark W. [2 ,7 ]
机构
[1] Yeungnam Univ, Coll Med, Yeungnam Univ Hosp, Dept Psychiat, Daegu, South Korea
[2] Univ Calif San Diego, Sch Med, Dept Psychiat, La Jolla, CA 92093 USA
[3] Yeungnam Univ Hosp, Dept Psychol, Daegu, South Korea
[4] Banner Alzheimers Inst, Tucson, AZ USA
[5] Univ Arizona, Dept Neurol, Tucson, AZ USA
[6] Univ Arizona, Dept Psychol, Tucson, AZ USA
[7] Vet Affairs San Diego Healthcare Syst, San Diego, CA USA
来源
ALPHA PSYCHIATRY | 2024年 / 25卷 / 02期
关键词
Neuropsychology; dementia; cognition; ALZHEIMERS-DISEASE; PREDICTS CONVERSION; MEMORY COMPLAINTS; MILD; DEMENTIA; PROGRESSION;
D O I
10.5152/alphapsychiatry.2024.231448
中图分类号
R749 [精神病学];
学科分类号
100205 ;
摘要
Background: Theories on Alzheimer disease pathogenesis propose a gap between path-ological changes and the onset of clinical symptoms. The early detection of cognitive decline is crucial for the implementation of preventive strategies. Mild cognitive impair-ment is a transitional stage and an accurate diagnosis is vital. However, the diagnosis of mild cognitive impairment varies due to inconsistent diagnostic criteria. This study aims to explore the effectiveness of comprehensive neuropsychological criteria, including all cognitive domains, for diagnosing cognitive impairment in clinical settings. Methods: The study included 509 subjects with subjective cognitive complaints between 2017 and 2021. They were diagnosed using the conventional and neuropsychological cri-teria, and the results were named the complex criteria (conventional crite ria-n europ sycho logic al criteria). Results: Concordance between the conventional and neuropsychological diagnostic criteria diagnoses was 87.82%. Some participants diagnosed with mild cognitive impair-ment or dementia using the conventional criteria were classified as normal according to the neuropsychological criteria. Notably, the mild cognitive impairment - normal cogni-tion (MCI-NC) and dementia (DEM)-NC (normal cognition) groups exhibited distinct char-acteristics. The MCI-NC group had higher depression scores (P= .008) and better memory performance (P= .026) and executive function (P= .020) than the MCI-MCI group. The DEM-NC group had better instrumental activities of daily living (P< .001) than the DEM-DEM group. Conclusion: This study highlights the complexity of diagnosing cognitive impairment and the importance of comprehensive criteria. Relying solely on conventional criteria may lead to overdiagnosis. The neuropsychological criteria consider various cognitive domains and better discriminate between individuals with MCIs or other factors that contribute to cognitive difficulties.
引用
收藏
页数:179
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Operational criteria for confirmation of clinical diagnosis of Alzheimer's disease in patients with mild cognitive impairment
    Feldman, H
    Schelte, P
    Scarpini, E
    Mancione, L
    Lane, R
    NEUROBIOLOGY OF AGING, 2004, 25 : S472 - S472
  • [32] AN ECONOMIC COMPARISON OF CONVENTIONAL VS. INTENSIVE HEIFER REARING
    Overton, M. W.
    Corbett, R. B.
    Boomer, W. G.
    2013 CORNELL NUTRITION CONFERENCE FOR FEED MANUFACTURERS, 75TH MEETING, 2013, : 77 - 85
  • [33] Documenting diagnosis: Comparing mild cognitive impairment diagnosis rates from ICD codes vs clinical notes
    Kamauu, Aaron W. C.
    Patterson, Olga V.
    Johnson, Todd
    Wilson, Andrew
    Holmen, John R.
    Bailey, Nicole M.
    Alba, Patrick R.
    Viernes, Benjamin
    Lynch, Kristine E.
    DuVall, Scott L.
    PHARMACOEPIDEMIOLOGY AND DRUG SAFETY, 2018, 27 : 370 - 370
  • [34] Clinical vs. molecular diagnosis of Gorlin syndrome: relevance of diagnostic criteria depends on the age of the patients
    Hercent, Agathe
    Bennani, Rizk
    Lafitte, Philippe
    Mary, Mickael
    Lamoril, Jerome
    Bourrat, Emmanuelle
    Kannengiesser, Caroline
    Tchernitchko, Dimitri
    CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL DERMATOLOGY, 2024, 50 (02) : 380 - 386
  • [35] Randomized Clinical Trial of the IADPSG vs. Carpenter Coustan Criteria for Diagnosis of Gestational Diabetes Mellitus
    Scifres, Christina M.
    Abebe, Kaleab
    Simhan, Hyagriv
    Catalano, Patrick
    Costacou, Tina
    Comer, Diane M.
    Orris, Steven R.
    Ly, Kathleen
    Decker, Alison
    Mendez, Dara
    Davis, Esa
    DIABETES, 2020, 69
  • [36] Care mapping in clinical neuroscience settings: Cognitive impairment and dependency
    Leigh, Andrew James
    O'Hanlon, Katie
    Sheldrick, Russell
    Surr, Claire
    Hare, Dougal Julian
    NEUROPSYCHOLOGICAL REHABILITATION, 2015, 25 (04) : 574 - 592
  • [37] Neuropsychological and clinical heterogeneity of cognitive impairment in patients with multiple system atrophy
    Barcelos, Lorena Broseghini
    Saad, Flavia
    Giacominelli, Carla
    Saba, Roberta Arb
    de Carvalho Aguiar, Patricia Maria
    Azevedo Silva, Sonia Maria
    Borges, Vanderci
    Ferreira Bertolucci, Paulo Henrique
    Ferraz, Henrique Ballalai
    CLINICAL NEUROLOGY AND NEUROSURGERY, 2018, 164 : 121 - 126
  • [38] Clinical and neuropsychological predictors of neuropsychiatric symptoms in subjects with MS and cognitive impairment
    Lovera, Jesus
    Frohman, Elliot
    Brown, Theodore
    Bandari, Daniel
    Wild, Katherine
    Rilling, Laurie
    Yadav, Vijayshree
    Whitham, Ruth
    Stuve, Olaf
    Bourdette, Dennis F.
    NEUROLOGY, 2008, 70 (11) : A211 - A211
  • [39] Cognitive impairment in schizophrenia: Clinical ratings are not a suitable alternative to neuropsychological testing
    Hofer, Alex
    Niedermayer, Bianca
    Kemmler, Georg
    Rettenbacher, Maria A.
    Trebo, Elisabeth
    Widschwendter, Christian G.
    Fleischhacker, W. Wolfgang
    SCHIZOPHRENIA RESEARCH, 2007, 92 (1-3) : 126 - 131
  • [40] Which clinical and neuropsychological factors are responsible for cognitive impairment in patients with epilepsy?
    Jarcuskova, Dominika
    Palusna, Miroslava
    Gazda, Jakub
    Feketeova, Eva
    Gdovinova, Zuzana
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH, 2020, 65 (06) : 947 - 956