Geochemical tracers associated with methane in aquifers overlying a coal seam gas reservoir

被引:0
|
作者
Pearce, J. K. [1 ,2 ,6 ]
Hofmann, H. [2 ,7 ]
Baublys, K. [2 ]
Cendon, D. I. [3 ,4 ]
Golding, S. D. [2 ]
Herbert, S. J. [5 ]
Bhebhe, Z. [5 ]
Nguyen, A. [2 ]
Hayes, P. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Queensland, Ctr Nat Gas, Brisbane, Qld 4072, Australia
[2] Univ Queensland, Sch Environm, Brisbane, Qld 4072, Australia
[3] ANSTO, Lucas Heights, NSW, Australia
[4] UNSW, Sch Biol Earth & Environm Sci, Sydney, NSW 2052, Australia
[5] Arrow Energy, Brisbane, Qld 4000, Australia
[6] Univ Queensland, Ctr Nat Gas, UQ Gas & Energy Transit Res Ctr, Brisbane, Qld 4072, Australia
[7] Commonwealth Sci & Ind Res Org CSIRO, Brisbane, Australia
关键词
Great Artesian Basin; Surat Basin; Clarence -Moreton Basin; Methanogenesis; Coal bed methane; SOUTHEAST MURRAY BASIN; DRINKING-WATER WELLS; GREAT ARTESIAN BASIN; ENVIRONMENTAL ISOTOPES; SHALLOW GROUNDWATER; WALLOON SUBGROUP; SURFACE-WATER; SURAT BASIN; QUEENSLAND; ORIGIN;
D O I
10.1016/j.coal.2024.104535
中图分类号
TE [石油、天然气工业]; TK [能源与动力工程];
学科分类号
0807 ; 0820 ;
摘要
Understanding inter-aquifer connectivity or leakage of greenhouse gases and groundwater to aquifers overlying gas reservoirs is important for environmental protection and social licence to operate. Australia's Great Artesian Basin (GAB) is the largest artesian groundwater system in the world with groundwater extracted for agriculture, livestock, mines, energy, private or town water supply. Microbial coal seam gas (CSG) and production water are also extracted from the GAB. Here a range of groundwater tracers is used to investigate the potential for gas and groundwater connectivity between the CSG reservoir and aquifers. The GAB aquifer and alluvium contained a range of methane concentrations (0.001 to 2100 mg/L) that exhibit an increase with depth and delta C-13-CH4. Aquifer and alluvium groundwater Sr-87/Sr-86 were in the range 0.7042 to 0.7082. CSG production waters however had non-radiogenic, distinctive Sr-87/Sr-86 signatures <0.7036, indicating a lack of significant groundwater leakage. One gassy aquifer bore with 160 mg/L methane conversely has Sr-87/Sr-86, delta C-13-CH4, delta H-2-CH4 and delta C-13-DIC values overlapping the CSG waters. In several aquifers delta S-34-SO4 and delta O-18-SO4 are sourced from windblown surface salts of inland Australian playa lakes in recharge waters. Bacterial sulphate reduction is additionally occurring in a regional aquifer. Cosmogenic isotopes and tritium show recent recharge and mixing with older groundwaters in several shallow aquifers. Groundwater and gas signatures indicate that leakage of groundwater and methane from the CSG reservoir was not occurring in the majority of areas investigated here. Methane was consistent with in situ generation in shallow GAB aquifers by primary microbial CO2 reduction or acetate fermentation. Connectivity of one alluvial bore and the underlying GAB aquifer could not be completely ruled out. Separately, one gassy Springbok GAB aquifer bore is either connected to the underlying CSG gas reservoir, or has in situ secondary microbial CO2 reduction producing methane from interbedded coal within the aquifer. This study is relevant to other basins in Australia and internationally where gas is observed in aquifers that overly conventional, unconventional or coal seam gas reservoirs.
引用
收藏
页数:20
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Strategies for the management and treatment of coal seam gas associated water
    Millar, Graeme J.
    Couperthwaite, Sara J.
    Moodliar, Cameron D.
    RENEWABLE & SUSTAINABLE ENERGY REVIEWS, 2016, 57 : 669 - 691
  • [22] Chemical and bioanalytical assessment of coal seam gas associated water
    Tang, Janet Y. M.
    Taulis, Mauricio
    Edebeli, Jacinta
    Leusch, Frederic D. L.
    Jagals, Paul
    Jackson, Gregory P.
    Escher, Beate I.
    ENVIRONMENTAL CHEMISTRY, 2015, 12 (03) : 267 - 285
  • [23] Gas pressure relief rule of overlying coal seam induced by fully mechanized top coal caving in long working face
    Wu, Ren-Lun
    Xu, Jia-Lin
    Kong, Xiang
    Shi, Cheng-Tao
    Luo, Bao-Lin
    Hu, Ya-Min
    Li, Yue-Kui
    Caikuang yu Anquan Gongcheng Xuebao/Journal of Mining and Safety Engineering, 2010, 27 (01): : 8 - 12
  • [24] Influence of Water Injection Pressure on Methane Gas Displacement by Coal Seam Water Injection
    Shi, Tianwei
    Pan, Yishan
    Zheng, Wenhong
    Wang, Aiwen
    GEOFLUIDS, 2022, 2022
  • [25] The influence of petrological properties and burial history on coal seam methane reservoir characterisation, Sydney Basin, Australia
    Faiz, M.
    Saghafi, A.
    Sherwood, N.
    Wang, I.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF COAL GEOLOGY, 2007, 70 (1-3) : 193 - 208
  • [26] Isotope geochemical features and layered quantitative method of coal seam group gas combined extraction
    Tianjun Zhang
    Jiaokun Wu
    Hong Ding
    Zhiqiang Ling
    Arabian Journal of Geosciences, 2021, 14 (24)
  • [27] Understanding coal seam gas associated water, regulations and strategies for treatment
    Rebello, Chantelle A.
    Couperthwaite, Sara J.
    Millar, Graeme J.
    Dawes, Les A.
    JOURNAL OF UNCONVENTIONAL OIL AND GAS RESOURCES, 2016, 13 : 32 - 43
  • [28] Softening of coal seam gas associated water with aluminium exchanged resins
    Barker, Ryan E.
    Nuttall, Kenneth
    Millar, Graeme J.
    JOURNAL OF WATER PROCESS ENGINEERING, 2018, 21 : 27 - 43
  • [29] Overburden Failure Associated with Slicing Mining in a Super Thick Coal Seam under Special Weak Aquifers
    Chen, Kai
    Ge, Ying
    Liu, Zhiqi
    Chen, Lifeng
    Zhang, Quan
    WATER, 2022, 14 (23)
  • [30] Study on the Differences between Various Gas Injection Sources in the Process of Coal Seam Methane Replacement by Gas Injection
    Zhou, Kan
    Yang, Hongmin
    Guan, Jinfeng
    Si, Zhongying
    ACS OMEGA, 2022, 7 (42): : 37572 - 37580