A review evaluating the gaps in plastic impacts in life cycle assessment

被引:1
|
作者
Sabate, Kealohi [1 ]
Kendall, Alissa [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Calif Davis, Dept Civil & Environm Engn, 1 Shields Ave, Davis, CA 95816 USA
来源
关键词
LCA; Characterization factors; Plastic waste; Marine debris; Litter; End-of-life; WASTE MANAGEMENT; POLYPROPYLENE; POLLUTION; LCA; MICROPLASTICS; ENVIRONMENTS; DISPOSAL; RELEASE; LITTER; WATER;
D O I
10.1016/j.cesys.2024.100205
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Plastics provide numerous societal benefits but have adverse effects on the environment over their life cycles; however, the magnitude, time horizon, and scope of these impacts is uncertain, particularly for plastics that are lost to the environment. Life cycle assessment (LCA) is a method intended to capture environmental impacts of a product from cradle-to-grave, and has often been applied to plastics. This article undertakes a systematic literature review of LCA and life cycle impact assessment (LCIA) methods tailored to plastics, with particular focus on end-of-life stages and impacts from plastics lost to the environment. The review identified 1541 articles for screening, of which 51 were selected for review. Results show that even when LCA studies are largely focused on end-of-life, most ignore the risks of losing plastics to the environment, and omit the attendant impacts. Articles devoted to creating LCIA methods for plastics in the environment are growing in number, and focus primarily, on the effects of macroplastics in the marine environment. The review shows an urgent need to better understand the probability of plastic losses to the environment and their fate and transport, and develop impact characterization factors that better reflect the effects of plastics on humans and ecosystems.
引用
收藏
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Mastering complexity in Life Cycle Assessment for product development: Evaluating the impacts of adaptive façades
    Borschewski, David
    Weber, Simon
    Albrecht, Stefan
    Leistner, Philip
    SUSTAINABLE PRODUCTION AND CONSUMPTION, 2024, 49 : 341 - 353
  • [32] A review on Life Cycle Assessment, Life Cycle Energy Assessment and Life Cycle Carbon Emissions Assessment on buildings
    Chau, C. K.
    Leung, T. M.
    Ng, W. Y.
    APPLIED ENERGY, 2015, 143 : 395 - 413
  • [33] Aid for aggregating the impacts in life cycle assessment
    Benoit, V
    Rousseaux, P
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LIFE CYCLE ASSESSMENT, 2003, 8 (02): : 74 - 82
  • [34] Politics and the plastic crisis: A review throughout the plastic life cycle
    Nielsen, Tobias D.
    Hasselbalch, Jacob
    Holmberg, Karl
    Stripple, Johannes
    WILEY INTERDISCIPLINARY REVIEWS-ENERGY AND ENVIRONMENT, 2020, 9 (01)
  • [35] Aid for aggregating the impacts in Life Cycle assessment
    Valérie Benoit
    Patrick Rousseaux
    The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 2003, 8 : 74 - 82
  • [36] Synergies and gaps between circularity assessment and Life Cycle Assessment (LCA)
    Samani, Pouya
    SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT, 2023, 903
  • [37] Comparative assessment of life cycle impacts of various plastic waste management scenarios in Johannesburg, South Africa
    Mazhandu, Zvanaka S.
    Muzenda, Edison
    Belaid, Mohamed
    Nhubu, Trust
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LIFE CYCLE ASSESSMENT, 2023, 28 (05): : 536 - 553
  • [38] Environmental impacts of wooden, plastic, and wood-polymer composite pallet: a life cycle assessment approach
    Khan, Md. Musharof Hussain
    Deviatkin, Ivan
    Havukainen, Jouni
    Horttanainen, Mika
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LIFE CYCLE ASSESSMENT, 2021, 26 (08): : 1607 - 1622
  • [39] Life Cycle Assessment Model of Plastic Products: Comparing Environmental Impacts for Different Scenarios in the Production Stage
    Mannheim, Viktoria
    POLYMERS, 2021, 13 (05) : 1 - 20
  • [40] Environmental impacts of wooden, plastic, and wood-polymer composite pallet: a life cycle assessment approach
    Md.Musharof Hussain Khan
    Ivan Deviatkin
    Jouni Havukainen
    Mika Horttanainen
    The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 2021, 26 : 1607 - 1622