Safety and Effectiveness of COVID-19 Vaccines During Pregnancy: A Living Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

被引:4
|
作者
Ciapponi, Agustin [1 ,2 ]
Berrueta, Mabel [3 ]
Argento, Fernando J. [1 ]
Ballivian, Jamile [1 ]
Bardach, Ariel [1 ,2 ]
Brizuela, Martin E. [1 ]
Castellana, Noelia [3 ]
Comande, Daniel [1 ]
Gottlieb, Sami [4 ]
Kampmann, Beate [5 ,6 ]
Mazzoni, Agustina [3 ]
Parker, Edward P. K. [5 ]
Sambade, Juan M. [1 ]
Stegelmann, Katharina [1 ]
Xiong, Xu [7 ]
Stergachis, Andy [8 ,9 ]
Buekens, Pierre [7 ]
机构
[1] Inst Clin Effectiveness & Hlth Policy IECS, Argentine Cochrane Ctr, Ravignani 2024,C1414CPV, Buenos Aires, Argentina
[2] Consejo Nacl Invest Cient & Tecn, Ctr Invest Epidemiol & Salud Publ CIESP, IECS, Buenos Aires, Argentina
[3] Inst Clin Effectiveness & Hlth Policy IECS, Dept Mother & Child Hlth, Buenos Aires, Argentina
[4] WHO, Dept Sexual & Reprod Hlth & Res, Geneva, Switzerland
[5] London Sch Hyg & Trop Med, London, England
[6] Charite, Charite Ctr Global Hlth, Vaccine Ctr, Berlin, Germany
[7] Tulane Univ, Sch Publ Hlth & Trop Med, New Orleans, LA USA
[8] Univ Washington, Sch Pharm, Seattle, WA USA
[9] Univ Washington, Sch Publ Hlth, Seattle, WA USA
基金
比尔及梅琳达.盖茨基金会;
关键词
VACCINATION; OUTCOMES;
D O I
10.1007/s40264-024-01458-w
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
BackgroundPregnant persons are susceptible to significant complications following COVID-19, even death. However, worldwide COVID-19 vaccination coverage during pregnancy remains suboptimal.ObjectiveThis study assessed the safety and effectiveness of COVID-19 vaccines administered to pregnant persons and shared this evidence via an interactive online website.MethodsWe followed Cochrane methods to conduct this living systematic review. We included studies assessing the effects of COVID-19 vaccines in pregnant persons. We conducted searches every other week for studies until October 2023, without restrictions on language or publication status, in ten databases, guidelines, preprint servers, and COVID-19 websites. The reference lists of eligible studies were hand searched to identify additional relevant studies. Pairs of review authors independently selected eligible studies using the web-based software COVIDENCE. Data extraction and risk of bias assessment were performed independently by pairs of authors. Disagreements were resolved by consensus. We performed random-effects meta-analyses of adjusted relative effects for relevant confounders of comparative studies and proportional meta-analyses to summarize frequencies from one-sample studies using R statistical software. We present the GRADE certainty of evidence from comparative studies. Findings are available on an interactive living systematic review webpage, including an updated evidence map and real-time meta-analyses customizable by subgroups and filters.ResultsWe included 177 studies involving 638,791 participants from 41 countries. Among the 11 types of COVID-19 vaccines identified, the most frequently used platforms were mRNA (154 studies), viral vector (51), and inactivated virus vaccines (17). Low to very low-certainty evidence suggests that vaccination may result in minimal to no important differences compared to no vaccination in all assessed maternal and infant safety outcomes from 26 fewer to 17 more events per 1000 pregnant persons, and 13 fewer to 9 more events per 1000 neonates, respectively. We found statistically significant reductions in emergency cesarean deliveries (9%) with mRNA vaccines, and in stillbirth (75-83%) with mRNA/viral vector vaccines. Low to very low-certainty evidence suggests that vaccination during pregnancy with mRNA vaccines may reduce severe cases or hospitalizations in pregnant persons with COVID-19 (72%; 95% confidence interval [CI] 42-86), symptomatic COVID-19 (78%; 95% CI 21-94), and virologically confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection (82%; 95% CI 39-95). Reductions were lower with other vaccine types and during Omicron variant dominance than Alpha and Delta dominance. Infants also presented with fewer severe cases or hospitalizations due to COVID-19 and laboratory-confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection (64%; 95% CI 37-80 and 66%; 95% CI 37-81, respectively).ConclusionsWe found a large body of evidence supporting the safety and effectiveness of COVID-19 vaccines during pregnancy. While the certainty of evidence is not high, it stands as the most reliable option available, given the current absence of pregnant individuals in clinical trials. Results are shared in near real time in an accessible and interactive format for scientists, decision makers, clinicians, and the general public. This living systematic review highlights the relevance of continuous vaccine safety and effectiveness monitoring, particularly in at-risk populations for COVID-19 impact such as pregnant persons, during the introduction of new vaccines. Clinical Trial RegistrationPROSPERO: CRD42021281290.
引用
收藏
页码:991 / 1010
页数:20
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] COVID-19 and Pregnancy Complications: Meta-analysis and Systematic Review
    Gokce, Sefik
    Herkiloglu, Dilsad
    CURRENT WOMENS HEALTH REVIEWS, 2024, 20 (03)
  • [32] COVID-19 pneumonia and pregnancy; a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Kasraeian, Maryam
    Zare, Marjan
    Vafaei, Homeira
    Asadi, Nasrin
    Faraji, Azam
    Bazrafshan, Khadijeh
    Roozmeh, Shohreh
    JOURNAL OF MATERNAL-FETAL & NEONATAL MEDICINE, 2022, 35 (09): : 1652 - 1659
  • [33] Safety, immunogenicity, and effectiveness of COVID-19 vaccines for pregnant persons: A protocol for systematic review and meta analysis
    Ciapponi, Agustin
    Berrueta, Mabel
    Ballivian, Jamile
    Bardach, Ariel
    Mazzoni, Agustina
    Anderson, Steven
    Argento, Fernando J.
    Bok, Karin
    Comande, Daniel
    Goucher, Erin
    Kampmann, Beate
    Parker, Edward P. K.
    Rodriguez-Cairoli, Federico
    Maria, Victoria Santa
    Stergachis, Andy
    Voss, Gerald
    Xiong, Xu
    Zaraa, Sabra
    Munoz, Flor M.
    Karron, Ruth A.
    Gottlieb, Sami L.
    Buekens, Pierre M.
    MEDICINE, 2023, 102 (09) : E32954
  • [34] Safety, immunogenicity, and protective effective of inhaled COVID-19 vaccines: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Song, Gao
    Li, Rong
    Cheng, Meng-qun
    JOURNAL OF MEDICAL VIROLOGY, 2024, 96 (04)
  • [35] Efficacy, immunogenicity and safety of COVID-19 vaccines in older adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Li, Zejun
    Liu, Shouhuan
    Li, Fengming
    Li, Yifeng
    Li, Yilin
    Peng, Pu
    Li, Sai
    He, Li
    Liu, Tieqiao
    FRONTIERS IN IMMUNOLOGY, 2022, 13
  • [36] Efficacy and Safety of COVID-19 Vaccines: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Clinical Trials
    Pormohammad, Ali
    Zarei, Mohammad
    Ghorbani, Saied
    Mohammadi, Mehdi
    Razizadeh, Mohammad Hossein
    Turner, Diana L.
    Turner, Raymond J.
    VACCINES, 2021, 9 (05)
  • [37] The Impact of Age Difference on the Efficacy and Safety of COVID-19 Vaccines: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Wang, Jiting
    Tong, Yue
    Li, Duo
    Li, Jun
    Li, Yaling
    FRONTIERS IN IMMUNOLOGY, 2021, 12
  • [38] Real-World Safety of COVID-19 mRNA Vaccines: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Xu, Wanqian
    Ren, Weigang
    Wu, Tongxin
    Wang, Qin
    Luo, Mi
    Yi, Yongxiang
    Li, Junwei
    VACCINES, 2023, 11 (06)
  • [39] Acceptance of COVID-19 Vaccines in India: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Kumar, Gunjan
    Jena, Samikshya
    Snigdha, Niher Tabassum
    Basha, Sakeenabi
    Narayanan, Jayaraj Kodangattil
    Luke, Alexander Maniangat
    VACCINES, 2023, 11 (05)
  • [40] Immunogenicity Characterization of COVID-19 Vaccines: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
    Vasconcelos, Zanair Soares
    Salem, Hany Abdulateif
    Veiga, Samia Pimenta
    de Lima, Fabiola Estefany Botelho
    Goncalves, Cesar Rogerio da Silva
    dos Santos, Eliane Carvalho
    Brandao, Alba Regina Jorge
    Couceiro, Katia Nascimento
    Guerra, Jorge Augusto de Oliveira
    Guerra, Maria das Gracas Vale Barbosa
    REVISTA DA SOCIEDADE BRASILEIRA DE MEDICINA TROPICAL, 2023, 56