Are We on Course Yet? Functional Behavior Assessment and Behavior Intervention Plan Technical Adequacy in Schools

被引:0
|
作者
Iovannone, Rose [1 ]
Moore, Tobey Duble [2 ]
Williams, Jeffrey M. [1 ]
Sanchez, Sindy [1 ]
Kauk, Nycole [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ S Florida, Dept Child & Family Studies, Tampa, FL 33612 USA
[2] Univ Connecticut, Neag Sch Educ, Dept Educ Psychol, Storrs, CT 06269 USA
关键词
functional behavior assessment; behavior intervention plans; technical adequacy; FUTURE;
D O I
10.3390/bs14060466
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
It has been more than two decades since the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA; 1997) included language about the use of functional behavior assessments (FBAs) and behavior intervention plans (BIPs) to address the challenging behaviors of students with disabilities in schools. It has been more than ten years since three technical adequacy studies were published that evaluated school-based FBAs' and BIPs' inclusion of essential components and found them to be significantly lacking. The aims of this study were to expand upon the previous research by (a) establishing the psychometric properties of the FBA/BIP Technical Adequacy Evaluation Tool (TATE), (b) evaluating the technical adequacy of 135 completed FBAs and 129 BIPs from 13 school districts across a single state, and (c) comparing the findings to previous studies. The results showed that (a) the TATE has moderate but acceptable internal consistency, excellent inter-rater reliability, and good content validity, (b) the technical adequacy scores of the evaluated products ranged between 40% and 50% of the total components, and (c) most of the BIPs had similar flaws to those seen in the previous research; however, improvement was noted in the FBA components. The implications for practice and suggestions for future research are discussed.
引用
收藏
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条