Climate policy as social policy? A comprehensive assessment of the economic impact of climate action in the UK

被引:0
|
作者
Sudmant, Andrew [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Boyle, Dom [4 ]
Higgins-Lavery, Ruaidhri [1 ]
Gouldson, Andy [2 ]
Boyle, Andy [3 ]
Fulker, James [4 ]
Brogan, Jamie [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Edinburgh, Edinburgh Climate Change Inst, Edinburgh EH1 1LZ, Scotland
[2] Univ Leeds, Sustainabil Res Inst, Fac Environm, Leeds, England
[3] Your Climate Strategy, 3 Whiteley Croft Gardens, Otley LS21 3PF, England
[4] Price Waterhouse Coopers, 1 Embankment Pl, London WC2N 6RH, England
关键词
Climate change; Co-benefits; Urban climate action; Sixth Carbon Budget; MITIGATION;
D O I
10.1007/s13412-024-00955-9
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Co-benefits are central to the case for climate action but are side-lined in many economic analyses. This paper presents an evaluation of three dimensions of the costs and benefits of climate change interventions in six urban regions of the UK. Findings indicate that meeting the UK's 2033-2037 climate targets could yield 164 pound billion in total benefits. Notably, only 13% of these benefits are financial, in contrast to the 79% of which are social benefits. These social benefits include improvements in public health, reduced traffic congestion, and increased thermal comfort in homes. These results underscore the need for economic evaluations to expand their scope and move beyond the narrow financial cost-benefit analysis that predominates. Moreover, the magnitude of the social benefits underscores the need for integrating social and climate challenges in policymaking. Concurrently, the results demonstrate the sensitivity of the social benefits of climate actions to the normative aspects of empirical analysis. Determining whether emissions reductions in the transport sector, for example, should be achieved through the deployment of electric cars, expansion of public transport, and/or increases in walking and cycling requires both technical analysis and value-based decision making. Ensuring that decision-making processes are deliberate and transparent in empirical analysis is therefore critical. We conclude by suggesting that institutions such as the UK Climate Change Committee and Scottish Climate Intelligence Service should take the opportunity to be more explicit in the normative decisions embedded in their empirical work to demonstrate best practice for the wider research community.
引用
收藏
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Climate Change Impact on Economic Growth: Regional Climate Policy under Cooperation and Noncooperation
    Cai, Yongyang
    Brock, William
    Xepapadeas, Anastasios
    JOURNAL OF THE ASSOCIATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL AND RESOURCE ECONOMISTS, 2023, 10 (03) : 569 - 605
  • [22] Research, Action and Policy: Addressing the Gendered Impact of Climate Change
    Davison, Lisa
    JOURNAL OF TRANSPORT GEOGRAPHY, 2013, 33 : 278 - 278
  • [23] The Distributional Impact of Climate Policy
    Jorgenson, Dale W.
    Goettle, Richard
    Ho, Mun S.
    Slesnick, Daniel T.
    Wilcoxen, Peter J.
    B E JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC ANALYSIS & POLICY, 2010, 10 (02):
  • [24] Climate policy support in the UK: An interaction of worldviews and policy types
    Bretter, Christian
    Schulz, Felix
    POLICY STUDIES JOURNAL, 2024,
  • [26] Climate change: Embed the social sciences in climate policy
    David Victor
    Nature, 2015, 520 : 27 - 29
  • [27] Reframing incentives for climate policy action
    J.-F. Mercure
    P. Salas
    P. Vercoulen
    G. Semieniuk
    A. Lam
    H. Pollitt
    P. B. Holden
    N. Vakilifard
    U. Chewpreecha
    N. R. Edwards
    J. E. Vinuales
    Nature Energy, 2021, 6 : 1133 - 1143
  • [28] Reframing incentives for climate policy action
    Mercure, J-F
    Salas, P.
    Vercoulen, P.
    Semieniuk, G.
    Lam, A.
    Pollitt, H.
    Holden, P. B.
    Vakilifard, N.
    Chewpreecha, U.
    Edwards, N. R.
    Vinuales, J. E.
    NATURE ENERGY, 2021, 6 (12) : 1133 - +
  • [29] Economic costs of aggressive climate policy
    Zhao, Xiaobing
    Du, Ding
    ENERGY SOURCES PART B-ECONOMICS PLANNING AND POLICY, 2017, 12 (04) : 312 - 317
  • [30] Economic theory and climate change policy
    Peters, I
    Ackerman, F
    Bernow, S
    ENERGY POLICY, 1999, 27 (09) : 501 - 504