Phase II Clinical Trial of Second Course of Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy for Spinal Metastases

被引:1
|
作者
Ito, Kei [1 ]
Nakajima, Yujiro [1 ,2 ]
Taguchi, Kentaro [1 ]
Ogawa, Hiroaki [1 ,3 ]
Saito, Makoto [4 ]
Murofushi, Keiko Nemoto [1 ]
机构
[1] Komagome Hosp, Tokyo Metropolitan Canc & Infect Dis Ctr, Dept Radiol, Div Radiat Oncol, 3-18-22 Honkomagome,Bunkyo Ku, Tokyo 1138677, Japan
[2] Komazawa Univ, Dept Radiol Sci, 1-23-1 Komazawa,Setagaya Ku, Tokyo 1548525, Japan
[3] Tohoku Univ, Dept Radiat Oncol, Grad Sch Med, 1-1 Seiryo Machi,Aoba Ku, Sendai 9808574, Japan
[4] Komagome Hosp, Tokyo Metropolitan Canc & Infect Dis Ctr, Div Clin Res Support, 3-18-22 Honkomagome,Bunkyo Ku, Tokyo 1138677, Japan
关键词
adverse effect; prospective clinical trial; second course; stereotactic body radiotherapy; spinal metastases; RADIATION-THERAPY; INTERNATIONAL CONSENSUS; MULTIPLE FRACTIONS; BONE METASTASES; END-POINTS; RADIOSURGERY; UPDATE; INSTITUTION; MULTICENTER; GUIDELINES;
D O I
10.3390/cancers16122286
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
This single-center, single-arm, phase II trial aimed to propose a safe and effective salvage spine SBRT regimen for patients with spinal metastases. The second SBRT dose consisted of 30 Gy delivered in five fractions with specific dose constraints for the spinal cord and nerve plexuses. Among the enrolled patients, 12 received the second SBRT at the same spinal level, while 8 received it at an adjacent level. No instances of radiation myelopathy or local failure were observed during the follow-up period. However, grade 3 late adverse effects (including lumbosacral plexopathy and vertebral compression fractures) were observed in 25% of patients throughout the entire follow-up period, suggesting that the second SBRT poses a risk of toxicity. Abstract Purpose: The optimal method for the second course of stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) for spinal metastases remains poorly established. This single-center, single-arm, phase II trial was conducted to propose a safe and effective salvage spine SBRT. Methods: The patients initially treated with SBRT for spine-targeted protocol treatment, or for areas adjacent to the spine, were enrolled. The second SBRT dose was 30 Gy delivered in five fractions; the spinal cord dose constraint was 15.5 Gy at the maximum point dose. The brachial or lumbosacral plexuses were dose-constrained to <30 Gy if the boundary between the nerves and tumors was detected. The primary endpoint was dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) (grade >= 3 severe radiation-related toxicity) within a year after the second SBRT. Results: The second SBRT was administered to the same spinal level in 12 patients and to an adjacent spinal level in 8 patients. SBRT2 was performed for 14 painful lesions, 10 MESCC, and 6 oligometastases, with some lesions having multiple indications. The median interval between SBRT sessions was 21 months (range: 6-51 months). The median follow-up duration was 14 months. No radiation myelopathy or local failure was reported during the follow-up period. DLT was confirmed in two patients (10%) within a year, both of whom developed grade 3 lumbosacral plexopathy. These two patients received SBRT twice to the S1-2 and S1-5 vertebrae, respectively, and both experienced paralysis of the tibialis anterior muscle (L5 level). Grade 3 late adverse effects (including lumbosacral plexopathy and vertebral compression fracture) were observed in 25% of the patients throughout the entire follow-up period. Conclusions: The second spine SBRT achieved good local control without causing myelopathy. However, one-quarter of the patients experienced grade 3 late adverse effects, suggesting that the treatment protocol carries a risk of toxicity.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy for Prostate Cancer: Current Results of a Phase II Trial
    King, Christopher
    IMRT IGRT SBRT- ADVANCES IN THE TREATMENT PLANNING AND DELIVERY OF RADIOTHERAPY, 2011, 43 : 428 - 437
  • [32] Phase I/II trial of combined kyphoplasty and intraoperative radiotherapy in spinal metastases
    Bludau, Frederic
    Welzel, Grit
    Reis, Tina
    Schneider, Frank
    Sperk, Elena
    Neumaier, Christian
    Ehmann, Michael
    Clausen, Sven
    Obertacke, Udo
    Wenz, Frederik
    Giordano, Frank A.
    SPINE JOURNAL, 2018, 18 (05): : 776 - 781
  • [33] Assessing treatment response following stereotactic body radiotherapy for spinal metastases
    Roth, Steven G.
    Chambless, Lola B.
    NEUROSURGICAL FOCUS, 2022, 53 (05)
  • [34] STEREOTACTIC BODY RADIOTHERAPY FOR BREAST CANCER SPINAL METASTASES IS ASSOCIATED WITH LOW
    Thomsen, Bryce
    Vesprini, Danny
    Zeng, Liang
    Myrehaug, Sten
    Tseng, Chai-lin
    Detsky, Jay
    Chen, Hanbo
    Zhang, Beibei
    Jerzak, Katarzyna
    Atenafu, Eshetu
    Maralani, Pejman
    Soliman, Hany
    Sahgal, Arjun
    RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2023, 186 : S6 - S7
  • [35] Stereotactic body radiotherapy for de novo spinal metastases: systematic review
    Husain, Zain A.
    Sahgal, Arjun
    De Salles, Antonio
    Funaro, Melissa
    Glover, Janis
    Hayashi, Motohiro
    Hiraoka, Masahiro
    Levivier, Marc
    Ma, Lijun
    Martinez-Alvarez, Roberto
    Paddick, J. Ian
    Regis, Jean
    Slotman, Ben J.
    Ryu, Samuel
    JOURNAL OF NEUROSURGERY-SPINE, 2017, 27 (03) : 295 - 302
  • [36] Vertebral compression fracture after stereotactic body radiotherapy for spinal metastases
    Sahgal, Arjun
    Whyne, Cari M.
    Ma, Lijun
    Larson, David A.
    Fehlings, Michael G.
    LANCET ONCOLOGY, 2013, 14 (08): : E310 - E320
  • [37] Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy for Spinal Metastases: Practice Guidelines, Outcomes, and Risks
    Jabbari, Siavash
    Gerszten, Peter C.
    Ruschin, Mark
    Larson, David A.
    Lo, Simon S.
    Sahgal, Arjun
    CANCER JOURNAL, 2016, 22 (04): : 280 - 289
  • [38] Marginal Recurrence Requiring Salvage Radiotherapy After Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy for Spinal Metastases
    Koyfman, Shlomo A.
    Djemil, Toufik
    Burdick, Michael J.
    Woody, Neil
    Balagamwala, Ehsan H.
    Reddy, Chandana A.
    Angelov, Lilyana
    Suh, John H.
    Chao, Samuel T.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2012, 83 (01): : 297 - 302
  • [39] Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy Combined with Sintilimab in Patients with Recurrent or Oligometastatic Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Phase II Clinical Trial
    Chen, Y.
    Yang, P.
    Du, S.
    Zhuang, Y.
    Hu, Y.
    Zeng, Z. C.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2023, 117 (02): : S106 - S107
  • [40] LungTech, an EORTC Phase II trial of stereotactic body radiotherapy for centrally located lung tumours: a clinical perspective
    Adebahr, S.
    Collette, S.
    Shash, E.
    Lambrecht, M.
    Le Pechoux, C.
    Faivre-Finn, C.
    De Ruysscher, D.
    Peulen, H.
    Belderbos, J.
    Dziadziuszko, R.
    Fink, C.
    Guckenberger, M.
    Hurkmans, C.
    Nestle, U.
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2015, 88 (1051):