Medication errors in emergency departments: a systematic review and meta-analysis of prevalence and severity

被引:2
|
作者
Nguyen, Phuong Thi Lan [1 ]
Phan, Thu Anh Thi [1 ]
Vo, Van Bich Ngoc [1 ]
Ngo, Nhi T. N. [2 ]
Nguyen, Ha Thi [1 ]
Phung, Toi Lam [3 ]
Kieu, Mai Thi Tuyet [4 ]
Nguyen, Thao Huong [5 ]
Duong, Khanh N. C. [1 ,6 ]
机构
[1] Vietnam Natl Univ Ho Chi Minh City, Sch Med, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam
[2] Mahidol Univ, Hlth Technol Assessment Program, Bangkok, Thailand
[3] Minist Hlth, Hlth Strategy & Policy Inst, Hanoi, Vietnam
[4] Hanoi Univ Pharm, Fac Pharmaceut Management & Econ, Hanoi, Vietnam
[5] Univ Med & Pharm Ho Chi Minh City, Fac Pharm, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam
[6] Univ Utah, Dept Pharmacotherapy, Coll Pharm, Salt Lake City, UT 84108 USA
关键词
Medication errors; Emergency service; Hospital; Prevalence; Systematic review; Meta-analysis; PRESCRIPTION ERRORS; CARE; FREQUENCY; CONSEQUENCES; PREVENTION; SAFETY;
D O I
10.1007/s11096-024-01742-w
中图分类号
R9 [药学];
学科分类号
1007 ;
摘要
Background Medication errors significantly compromise patient safety in emergency departments. Although previous studies have investigated the prevalence of these errors in this setting, results have varied widely. Aim The aim was to report pooled data on the prevalence and severity of medication errors in emergency departments, as well as the proportion of patients affected by these errors. MethodSystematic searches were conducted in Embase, PubMed, and the Cochrane Library from database inception until June 2023. Studies provided numerical data on medication errors within emergency departments were eligible for inclusion. Random-effects meta-analysis was employed to pool the prevalence of medication errors, the proportion of patients experiencing these errors, and the error severity levels. Heterogeneity among studies was assessed using the I-2 statistic and Cochran's Q test. Results Twenty-four studies met the inclusion criteria. The meta-analysis gave a pooled prevalence of medication errors in emergency departments of 22.6% (95% Confidence Interval [CI] 19.2-25.9%, I-2 = 99.9%, p < 0.001). The estimated proportion of patients experiencing medication errors was 36.3% (95% CI 28.3-44.3%, I-2 = 99.8%, p < 0.001). Of these errors, 42.6% (95% CI 5.0-80.1%) were potentially harmful but not life-threatening, while no-harm errors accounted for 57.3% (95% CI 14.1-100.0%). Conclusion The prevalence of medication errors, particularly those potentially harmful, underscores potential safety issues in emergency departments. It is imperative to develop and implement effective interventions aimed at reducing medication errors and enhancing patient safety in this setting.
引用
收藏
页码:1024 / 1033
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Prevalence of medication administration errors in hospitalized adults: A systematic review and meta-analysis up to 2017 to explore sources of heterogeneity
    Azar, Christine
    Raffoul, Paul
    Rizk, Rana
    Boutros, Celina
    Saleh, Nadine
    Maison, Patrick
    FUNDAMENTAL & CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY, 2023, 37 (03) : 531 - 548
  • [32] Prevalence of refractive errors in Nepalese children and adults: a systematic review with meta-analysis
    Bist, Jeewanand
    Kandel, Himal
    Paudel, Nabin
    Kaphle, Dinesh
    Gyawali, Rajendra
    Marasini, Sanjay
    Adhikary, Rabindra
    Paudel, Prakash
    CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL OPTOMETRY, 2023, 106 (02) : 119 - 132
  • [33] The Prevalence of Refractive Errors in Indian School Children: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Kumar, Vijay
    Soni, Manya
    Rajagopal, Vineeth
    Behera, Ashish
    Gandhi, Aravind
    Shamim, Muhammad Aaqib
    Gaidhane, Shilpa
    Rustagi, Sarvesh
    Rai, Nishant
    Sah, Sanjit
    Khatib, Mahalaqua Nazli
    Puri, Sonam
    Jaiswal, Vaibhav
    Singh, Mahendra
    Bushi, Ganesh
    Satapathy, Prakasini
    OPHTHALMIC EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2025,
  • [34] Prevalence of self-medication in university students: systematic review and meta-analysis
    Behzadifar, Meysam
    Behzadifar, Masoud
    Aryankhesal, Aidin
    Ravaghi, Hamid
    Baradaran, Hamid Reza
    Sajadi, Haniye Sadat
    Khaksarian, Mojtaba
    Bragazzi, Nicola Luigi
    EASTERN MEDITERRANEAN HEALTH JOURNAL, 2020, 26 (07) : 846 - 857
  • [35] Global and regional estimates of prevalence of refractive errors: Systematic review and meta-analysis
    Hashemi, Hassan
    Fotouhi, Akbar
    Yekta, Abbasali
    Pakzad, Reza
    Ostadimoghaddam, Hadi
    Khabazkhoob, Mehdi
    JOURNAL OF CURRENT OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2018, 30 (01): : 3 - 22
  • [36] Prevalence of self-medication among the elderly: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Rafati, Shideh
    Baniasadi, Tayebeh
    Dastyar, Neda
    Zoghi, Ghazal
    Ahmadidarrehsima, Sudabeh
    Salari, Nasibeh
    Rafati, Foozieh
    JOURNAL OF EDUCATION AND HEALTH PROMOTION, 2023, 12 (01) : 67
  • [37] Prevalence of harmful diagnostic errors in hospitalised adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Gunderson, Craig G.
    Bilan, Victor P.
    Holleck, Jurgen L.
    Nickerson, Phillip
    Cherry, Benjamin M.
    Chui, Philip
    Bastian, Lori A.
    Grimshaw, Alyssa A.
    Rodwin, Benjamin A.
    BMJ QUALITY & SAFETY, 2020, 29 (12) : 1008 - 1018
  • [38] Nursing interventions to reduce medication errors in paediatrics and neonates: Systematic review and meta-analysis
    Marufu, Takawira C.
    Bower, Rachel
    Hendron, Elizabeth
    Manning, Joseph C.
    JOURNAL OF PEDIATRIC NURSING-NURSING CARE OF CHILDREN & FAMILIES, 2022, 62 : E139 - E147
  • [39] Medication administration errors in emergency departments
    Ambrosio, L.
    Pumar-Mendez, M. J.
    ANALES DEL SISTEMA SANITARIO DE NAVARRA, 2013, 36 (03) : 541 - 541
  • [40] Effect of somatometric parameters on the prevalence and severity of varicocele: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Li, Runqing
    Liu, Junjie
    Li, Yushan
    Wang, Quanxian
    REPRODUCTIVE BIOLOGY AND ENDOCRINOLOGY, 2021, 19 (01)