Modeling strategies for wind turbines considering soil-structure interaction

被引:1
|
作者
Ferreira, Ynae Almeida [1 ]
Vernizzi, Guilherme Jorge [1 ]
Futai, Marcos Massao [2 ]
Franzini, Guilherme Rosa [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Sao Paulo, Offshore Mech Lab, Escola Politecn, Sao Paulo, Brazil
[2] Univ Sao Paulo, GeoInfraUSP, Escola Politecn, Sao Paulo, Brazil
基金
巴西圣保罗研究基金会;
关键词
Offshore wind turbines; Reduced-order model; Natural frequencies; Vibration mode shapes; Soil-structure interaction; MONOPILES; FREQUENCY;
D O I
10.1016/j.oceaneng.2024.118310
中图分类号
U6 [水路运输]; P75 [海洋工程];
学科分类号
0814 ; 081505 ; 0824 ; 082401 ;
摘要
Reduced-order models (ROMs) are developed for obtaining the natural frequencies of offshore wind turbines (OWTs) considering the soil-structure interaction (SSI) by distributed springs along the monopile and employing three different modeling strategies. The ROM is derived considering a non-prismatic beam with mass at the tip. Once the mathematical model is obtained, the natural frequencies of the NREL 5 MW reference wind turbine are analytically obtained and the results are compared with those obtained by higher-order hierarchical models based on the Finite Element Method (FEM). The novelty here is the presentation of a mathematical model for this SSI representation that allows obtaining different natural frequencies and the vibration modes representation in an analytical scheme. The analyses developed raise a discussion about the choice of the shape function in the use of Galerkin's method. The results show that, depending on the modeling strategy, the fundamental frequency of the OWT studied is obtained with great accuracy when compared to the FEM analysis (considered as a reference value), with difference below 3.5%. The ROMs obtained allow evaluating the natural frequencies and mode shapes with very low computational cost, a feature that can be useful especially in the early stages of design.
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Design of Culvert Considering Soil-Structure Interaction
    Zhang, David
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 5TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON TRANSPORTATION GEOTECHNICS, VOL 2, ICTG 2024, 2025, 403 : 55 - 64
  • [22] MODELING SOIL-STRUCTURE INTERACTION CONSTRUCTION
    SIMMONDS, SH
    PLAYDON, DK
    COMPUTERS & STRUCTURES, 1988, 28 (02) : 283 - 288
  • [23] Shaking table testing of a scaled wind turbine structure model considering soil-structure interaction
    Ding, Yanqiong
    Nie, Minggang
    Xu, Yazhou
    Bai, Guoliang
    Tumu Gongcheng Xuebao/China Civil Engineering Journal, 2024, 57 (10): : 25 - 32
  • [24] Computationally efficient modelling of dynamic soil-structure interaction of offshore wind turbines on gravity footings
    Damgaard, M.
    Andersen, L. V.
    Ibsen, L. B.
    RENEWABLE ENERGY, 2014, 68 : 289 - 303
  • [25] STRUCTURAL RESPONSE TO WIND WITH SOIL-STRUCTURE INTERACTION
    NOVAK, M
    ELHIFNAWY, L
    JOURNAL OF WIND ENGINEERING AND INDUSTRIAL AERODYNAMICS, 1988, 28 (1-3) : 329 - 338
  • [26] Effects of soil-structure interaction on real time dynamic response of offshore wind turbines on monopiles
    Damgaard, M.
    Zania, V.
    Andersen, L. V.
    Ibsen, L. B.
    ENGINEERING STRUCTURES, 2014, 75 : 388 - 401
  • [27] Seismic response analysis of wind turbine tower systems considering soil-structure interaction
    Department of Building Engineering, Tongji University, Shanghai 200092, China
    Jixie Gongcheng Xuebao, 1600, 7 (87-94):
  • [28] Analysis of soil-structure interaction considering complicated soil profile
    Park, Jang Ho
    Park, Jaegyun
    Park, Kwan-Soon
    Oh, Seung-Yong
    Numerical Methods and Applications, 2007, 4310 : 652 - 659
  • [29] Implicit vs explicit soil modeling in active structural control considering soil-structure interaction
    Chen, GD
    Chen, CJ
    Lou, ML
    Cheng, FY
    STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING AND MECHANICS, VOLS 1 AND 2, 1999, : 881 - 886
  • [30] STRUCTURAL CONTROL CONSIDERING SOIL-STRUCTURE INTERACTION EFFECTS
    SMITH, HA
    WU, WH
    BORJA, RI
    EARTHQUAKE ENGINEERING & STRUCTURAL DYNAMICS, 1994, 23 (06): : 609 - 626