A Comparative Study of Dynamic Hip Screws and Proximal Femoral Nails in Intertrochanteric Fractures

被引:0
|
作者
Thusoo, Varun [1 ]
Nehru, Ashish [2 ]
Kudyar, Sachin [3 ]
Chakrapani, Arjun S. [4 ]
Saini, Eshaan Singh [5 ]
Alok, K., V [6 ]
Narender, D. [7 ]
Philip, Suraj [8 ]
机构
[1] Adesh Med Coll & Hosp, Orthopaed Surg, Ambala, India
[2] Govt Med Coll & Rajindra Hosp, Orthopaed & Trauma, Patiala, India
[3] Govt Med Hosp, Orthopaed, Jammu, India
[4] Apollo Special Hosp, Orthopaed, Chennai, India
[5] Adesh Med Coll & Hosp, Orthopaed, Ambala, India
[6] Osmania Med Coll & Hosp, Orthopaed & Trauma, Hyderabad, India
[7] Govt Med Coll, Orthopaed & Trauma, Kothagudem, India
[8] Pushpagiri Inst Med Sci, Orthopaed, Hyderabad, India
关键词
weight bearing; intertrochanteric hip fractures; hip fracture; dynamic hip screws; proximal femoral nails; PERTROCHANTERIC FRACTURES; INTRAMEDULLARY; FIXATION; PLATE;
D O I
10.7759/cureus.59063
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background Intertrochanteric fractures, which occur in the hip of older individuals due to the weak and brittle structure of the bone caused by osteoporosis, make up over 50% of all hip fractures. There are several treatment options available for these fractures. The major objective of this study was to carry out a comparative analysis to evaluate the efficacy of dynamic hip screws (DHS) and proximal femoral nails (PFN) in treating intertrochanteric fractures. Methodology Two hundred instances of intertrochanteric hip fractures were surgically treated between July 2022 and January 2024 at a tertiary care facility. The evaluation of fractures was conducted in two groups, namely, group 1, which consisted of 140 patients, each having a fracture in one hip, treated using the DHS method. Group 2 consisted of 60 patients, each having a fracture in one hip, treated using the PFN technique. The evaluation of functional results was performed with the Harris hip score. Results In the investigation within these groups, group 1 produced excellent outcomes in 53 patients, which accounts for 37.86% of the total. In group 2, the expected results were achieved in 34 patients (56.67%). Achieved outcomes were favorable in 75 (53.57%) individuals in group 1 and 21 (35%) in group 2. Out of the individuals in group 1, eight (5.71%) saw benefits, whereas four (1.6%) did not gain significantly. In group 2, five (8.33%) individuals benefitted. None of the patients in group 2 had unfavorable outcomes. Conclusion While both PFN and DHS provide comparable outcomes in stable bone, PFN demonstrated superior results in cases of unstable bone. The use of PFN results in reduced surgical duration and a smaller surgical opening. Additionally, PFN exhibited superior specificity compared to DHS, especially in cases with stable intertrochanteric bone.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] TREATMENT OF UNSTABLE INTERTROCHANTERIC FRACTURE OF FEMUR WITH DYNAMIC HIP SCREW VERSUS PROXIMAL FEMORAL NAIL: A COMPARATIVE STUDY
    Chander, S. G.
    Kanagasarathy, K.
    Chander, Vijaysharathy
    Reddy, Narayana M.
    JOURNAL OF EVOLUTION OF MEDICAL AND DENTAL SCIENCES-JEMDS, 2015, 4 (59): : 10284 - 10293
  • [32] Hidden Blood Loss in Perioperative Period of Femoral Intertrochanteric Fractures Treated with Gamma Nail and Dynamic Hip Screws
    Li, S.
    Sun, W.
    Ma, H.
    Ye, B.
    Lu, Y. Y.
    Chen, L. L.
    Hong, F. Y.
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN GERIATRICS SOCIETY, 2013, 61 : S317 - S317
  • [33] Long proximal femoral nails versus short proximal femoral nails for the management of proximal femoral fractures: a retrospective study of 124 patients
    Dipak S. Parmar
    Milind M. Porecha
    Shilpa L. Chudasama
    European Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery & Traumatology, 2011, 21 : 159 - 164
  • [34] Long proximal femoral nails versus short proximal femoral nails for the management of proximal femoral fractures: a retrospective study of 124 patients
    Parmar, Dipak S.
    Porecha, Milind M.
    Chudasama, Shilpa L.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDIC SURGERY AND TRAUMATOLOGY, 2011, 21 (03): : 159 - 164
  • [35] Type II Intertrochanteric Fractures: Proximal Femoral Nailing (PFN) Versus Dynamic Hip Screw (DHS)
    Jonnes, Cyril
    Shishir, S. M.
    Najimudeen, Syed
    ARCHIVES OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-ABJS, 2016, 4 (01): : 23 - 28
  • [36] Comparison of two different proximal femoral nails in instabil intertrochanteric fractures concerning radiological parameters
    Sever, Gokhan Bulent
    Cankus, Mehmet Cenk
    Karsli, Burcin
    ULUSAL TRAVMA VE ACIL CERRAHI DERGISI-TURKISH JOURNAL OF TRAUMA & EMERGENCY SURGERY, 2021, 27 (03): : 344 - 350
  • [37] Distal Locking of Proximal Femoral Nails in Intertrochanteric Fractures: A Comparison of Taloned and Static Locking Systems
    Karagoz, B.
    Keceli, O.
    Agir, I
    NIGERIAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PRACTICE, 2024, 27 (05) : 620 - 627
  • [38] Comparative study of intertrochanteric fracture fixation using proximal femoral nail with and without distal interlocking screws
    Lil, Nadeem A.
    Makwana, Vipul R.
    Patel, Tirth D.
    Patel, Arjav R.
    WORLD JOURNAL OF ORTHOPEDICS, 2022, 13 (03): : 267 - 277
  • [39] Advantages of Distal Unlocked Proximal Femoral Nails in the Treatment of Stable Intertrochanteric Fractures in Geriatric Patients: A Single-Center Comparative Randomized Study
    Saglam, Sonmez
    Ersen, Omer
    Tuzun, Harun Yasin
    Yildiz, Cemil
    GERIATRIC ORTHOPAEDIC SURGERY & REHABILITATION, 2025, 16
  • [40] Comparative study of a novel proximal femoral bionic nail and three conventional cephalomedullary nails for reverse obliquity intertrochanteric fractures: a finite element analysis
    Yang, Yanjiang
    Tong, Yu
    Cheng, Xiaodong
    Zhu, Yanbin
    Chen, Wei
    Cui, Yunwei
    Zhang, Qi
    Zhang, Yingze
    FRONTIERS IN BIOENGINEERING AND BIOTECHNOLOGY, 2024, 12