Does Preoperative Back Pain Impact Patient-reported Outcomes in Patients Undergoing Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion for Isthmic Spondylolisthesis?

被引:0
|
作者
Nie, James W. [1 ]
Hartman, Timothy J. [1 ]
Zheng, Eileen [1 ]
Oyetayo, Omolabake O. [1 ]
MacGregor, Keith R. [1 ]
Federico, Vincent P. [1 ]
Massel, Dustin H. [1 ]
Sayari, Arash J. [1 ]
Singh, Kern [1 ]
机构
[1] Rush Univ, Med Ctr, Dept Orthoped Surg, 1611 W Harrison St, Suite 300, Chicago, IL 60612 USA
来源
CLINICAL SPINE SURGERY | 2024年 / 37卷 / 05期
关键词
isthmic spondylolisthesis; minimum clinically important difference; minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion; patient-reported outcome measures; CLINICALLY IMPORTANT DIFFERENCE; DISABILITY; SURGERY; IMPROVEMENT;
D O I
10.1097/BSD.0000000000001568
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
Study Design: Retrospective review. Objective: To determine postoperative clinical outcomes in patients undergoing minimally invasive (MIS) transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) for isthmic spondylolisthesis (IS). Background: Few studies have examined the postoperative clinical trajectory in patients undergoing MIS-TLIF specifically for IS. Methods: Patients were separated into two cohorts based on the previously defined Visual Analog Scale (VAS) back pain (BP) for severe pain: VAS-BP <7 and VAS-BP >= 7. Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) of Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System-physical function (PF), 12-item Short Form (SF-12) Physical/Mental Component Score, Patient Health Questionnaire-9, VAS-BP, VAS leg pain, and Oswestry Disability Index were collected preoperatively and up to 2-year postoperatively. Minimum clinically important difference (MCID) was calculated through previously defined thresholds. Results: A total of 160 patients were recorded, with 58 patients in the VAS-BP <7 cohort. The VAS-BP <7 cohort demonstrated significant improvement in all PROMs at one or more postoperative time points. The VAS-BP >= 7 demonstrated significant improvement at 3 or more postoperative time points in all PROMs except for SF-12 Mental Component Score. The VAS-BP <7 cohort reported significantly superior preoperative and postoperative PROMs in all domains, except for SF-12 Physical Component Score. The VAS-BP >= 7 cohort had higher MCID achievement rates at one or more time points in multiple PROMs. Conclusion: Patients undergoing MIS-TLIF for IS demonstrated significant postoperative improvement in PF, mental function, pain, and disability outcomes independent of preoperative severity of BP. Patients with lower preoperative BP demonstrated superior outcomes in PF, mental function, pain, and disability. However, patients with greater preoperative BP achieved higher rates of MCID in mental function, BP, and disability outcomes. Patients with greater severity of preoperative BP undergoing MIS-TLIF for IS may experience greater rates of clinically relevant improvement in mental function, BP, and disability outcomes.
引用
收藏
页码:E179 / E184
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Patient-Reported Outcomes of Minimally Invasive versus Open Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion for Degenerative Lumbar Disc Disease: A Prospective Comparative Cohort Study
    Jover-Mendiola, Antonio D.
    Lopez-Prats, Fernando A.
    Lizaur-Utrilla, Alejandro
    Vizcaya-Moreno, Maria -Flores
    CLINICS IN ORTHOPEDIC SURGERY, 2023, 15 (02) : 257 - 264
  • [42] Minimally Invasive Versus Open Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion for Degenerative Spondylolisthesis Grades 1-2: Patient-Reported Clinical Outcomes and Cost-Utility Analysis
    Sulaiman, Wale A. R.
    Singh, Manish
    OCHSNER JOURNAL, 2014, 14 (01): : 32 - 37
  • [43] Complications with Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion for Degenerative Spondylolisthesis in the Obese Population
    Buyuk, Abdul Fettah
    Shafa, Eiman
    Dawson, John M.
    Schwender, James D.
    SPINE, 2019, 44 (23) : E1401 - E1408
  • [44] Does the Predominant Pain Location Influence Functional Outcomes, Satisfaction, and Return to Work After Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion For Degenerative Spondylolisthesis?
    Goh, Graham S.
    Yue, Wai-Mun
    Guo, Chang Ming
    Tan, Seang-Beng
    Chen, John Li-Tat
    CLINICAL SPINE SURGERY, 2022, 35 (01): : E143 - E149
  • [45] Impact of Body Mass Index on Postsurgical Outcomes for Workers' Compensation Patients Undergoing Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion
    Patel, Madhav R.
    Jacob, Kevin C.
    Chavez, Frank A.
    DesLaurier, Justin T.
    Pawlowski, Hanna
    Prabhu, Michael C.
    Vanjani, Nisheka N.
    Singh, Kern
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SPINE SURGERY, 2022, 16 (04): : 595 - 604
  • [46] Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion A Review of Techniques and Outcomes
    Karikari, Isaac O.
    Isaacs, Robert E.
    SPINE, 2010, 35 (26) : S294 - S301
  • [47] Comparison of one-level minimally invasive and open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion in degenerative and isthmic spondylolisthesis grades 1 and 2
    Wang, Jian
    Zhou, Yue
    Zhang, Zheng Feng
    Li, Chang Qing
    Zheng, Wen Jie
    Liu, Jie
    EUROPEAN SPINE JOURNAL, 2010, 19 (10) : 1780 - 1784
  • [48] Comparison of one-level minimally invasive and open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion in degenerative and isthmic spondylolisthesis grades 1 and 2
    Jian Wang
    Yue Zhou
    Zheng Feng Zhang
    Chang Qing Li
    Wen Jie Zheng
    Jie Liu
    European Spine Journal, 2010, 19 : 1780 - 1784
  • [49] The Effect of Preoperative Symptom Duration on Postoperative Outcomes After Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion
    Yoo, Joon S.
    Patel, Dillon S.
    Hrynewycz, Nadia M.
    Brundage, Thomas S.
    Mogilevsky, Franchesca A.
    Singh, Kern
    CLINICAL SPINE SURGERY, 2020, 33 (06): : E263 - E268
  • [50] Comparison of Outcomes between Robot-Assisted Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion and Oblique Lumbar Interbody Fusion in Single-Level Lumbar Spondylolisthesis
    Han, Xiao-guang
    Tang, Guo-qing
    Han, Xiao
    Xing, Yong-gang
    Zhang, Qi
    He, Da
    Tian, Wei
    ORTHOPAEDIC SURGERY, 2021, 13 (07) : 2093 - 2101