MULTIPHASE MODELING OF DROPLET-BASED 3D PRINTING: PREDICTING PRINTABILITY, RESOLUTION AND SHAPE FIDELITY IN ADDITIVE MANUFACTURING PROCESSES

被引:0
|
作者
Shah, Rauf G. [1 ]
Mohan, Ram V. [1 ]
机构
[1] North Carolina Agr & Tech State Univ, Joint Sch Nanosci & Nanoengn, Greensboro, NC 27401 USA
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
Volume of Fluid Method; Droplet Impact; Print Quality; Process Optimization; CONTACT-ANGLE; IMPACT; DYNAMICS; SURFACE;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
TH [机械、仪表工业];
学科分类号
0802 ;
摘要
The multi-phase flow during the evolution of droplets in the printing process is modeled using the Volume of Fluid (VOF) method. It involves solving basic Navier-Stokes and Continuity equations for an incompressible flow with two or more immiscible phases on a finite volume grid. An indicator function keeps track of the interfaces and calculates the surface tension forces. A grid independence study showed convergence, indicating the efficacy of the solutions. The computational model agreed well with the experimental data and captured the impact, spreading, and recoiling of the droplet impinging on a solid surface. The computational model also validated the droplet's interaction with hydrophilic surface for constant and dynamic contact angles. Relevant non-dimensional numbers (Re, We, Oh) are also considered to study the interplay of different forces associated with droplet impact on a solid surface. The final quality of the printing depends on the droplet dynamics associated with the deposition. This phenomenon is governed by body forces (Surface Tension, gravity), contact angle, dissipative forces due to motion, and material properties. Computational studies give an insight into the overall process performance and the final print quality for different process conditions and material properties.
引用
收藏
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Additive manufacturing using 3D screen printing
    Dressler, M.
    Studnitzky, T.
    Kieback, B.
    2017 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON ELECTROMAGNETICS IN ADVANCED APPLICATIONS (ICEAA), 2017, : 476 - 478
  • [22] Factors for increasing additive manufacturing (3D printing)
    Nurhayati, Ai
    Rivai, Ahmad
    Indrayani, Rina
    PROCEEDINGS OF MECHANICAL ENGINEERING RESEARCH DAY 2019 (MERD'19), 2019, : 12 - 13
  • [23] Polymers for 3D Printing and Customized Additive Manufacturing
    Ligon, Samuel Clark
    Liska, Robert
    Stampfl, Juergen
    Gurr, Matthias
    Muelhaupt, Rolf
    CHEMICAL REVIEWS, 2017, 117 (15) : 10212 - 10290
  • [24] Special Issue on: 3D Printing and Additive Manufacturing
    Paulo Davim, J.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MATERIALS & PRODUCT TECHNOLOGY, 2019, 58 (2-3): : 103 - 103
  • [25] Production planning in additive manufacturing and 3D printing
    Li, Qiang
    Kucukkoc, Ibrahim
    Zhang, David Z.
    COMPUTERS & OPERATIONS RESEARCH, 2017, 83 : 157 - 172
  • [26] Additive manufacturing and 3D printing of metallic biomaterials
    Chua K.
    Khan I.
    Malhotra R.
    Zhu D.
    Engineered Regeneration, 2021, 2 : 288 - 299
  • [27] Additive manufacturing frontier: 3D printing electronics
    Lu, Bingheng
    Lan, Hongbo
    Liu, Hongzhong
    OPTO-ELECTRONIC ADVANCES, 2018, 1 (01): : 1 - 10
  • [28] Development Trends in Additive Manufacturing and 3D Printing
    Lu, Bingheng
    Li, Dichen
    Tian, Xiaoyong
    ENGINEERING, 2015, 1 (01) : 85 - 89
  • [29] Additive manufacturing (3D printing) for analytical chemistry
    Agrawaal, Harsshit
    Thompson, J. E.
    TALANTA OPEN, 2021, 3
  • [30] Additive manufacturing frontier: 3D printing electronics
    Bingheng Lu
    Hongbo Lan
    Hongzhong Liu
    Opto-Electronic Advances, 2018, 1 (01) : 11 - 20