Association between pelvic lymph node dissection and survival among patients with prostate cancer treated with radical prostatectomy

被引:1
|
作者
Kim Jr, Isaac E. [1 ]
Wang, Aaron H. [1 ]
Corpuz, George S. [2 ]
Sprenkle, Preston C. [3 ]
Leapman, Michael S. [3 ]
Brito, Joseph M. [3 ]
Renzulli, Joseph [3 ]
Kim, Isaac Yi [3 ]
机构
[1] Brown Univ, Warren Alpert Med Sch, Providence, RI USA
[2] Weill Cornell Med, New York, NY USA
[3] Yale Univ, Sch Med, Dept Urol, New Haven, CT USA
关键词
Cancer-specific survival; Pelvic lymph node dissection; Prostate cancer; Radical prostatectomy; PRACTICE GUIDELINES; HIGH-RISK; OUTCOMES; MEN;
D O I
10.1016/j.prnil.2024.01.002
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Introduction: Although the clinical benefits of pelvic lymph node dissection (PLND) at the time of radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer remain uncertain, major guidelines recommend PLND based on risk profile. Thus, the objective of this study was to examine the association between PLND and survival among patients undergoing RP stratified by Gleason grade group (GG) with the aim of allowing patients and physicians to make more informed care decisions about the potential risks and benefits of PLND. Materials and methods: From the SEER-17 database, we examined overall (OS) and prostate cancerspecific (PCSS) survival of prostate cancer patients who underwent RP from 2010 to 2015 stratified by GG. We applied propensity score matching to balance pre-operative characteristics including race, age, PSA, household income, and housing status (urban/rural) between patients who did and did not undergo PLND for each GG. Statistical analyses included log-rank test and Kaplan-Meier curves. Results: We extracted a matched cohort from 80,287 patients with GG1-5 who underwent RP. The median PSA value was 6.0 ng/mL, and the median age was 62-years-old. 49,453 patients underwent PLND (61.60%), while 30,834 (38.40%) did not. There was no difference in OS and PCSS between patients who received PLND and those who did not for all Gleason GG (OS-GG1: P = 0.20, GG2: P = 0.34, GG3: P > 0.05, GG4: P = 0.55, GG5: P = 0.47; PCSS-GG1: P = 0.11, GG2: P = 0.96, GG3: P = 0.81, GG4: P = 0.22, GG5: P = 0.14).<br /> Conclusions: In this observational study, PLND at the time of RP was not associated with improved OS or PCSS among patients with cGS of 3 + 3, 3 + 4, 4 + 3, 4 + 4, 4 + 5, and 5 + 4. These findings suggest that until definitive clinical trials are completed, prostate cancer patients who have elected RP should be appropriately counseled on the potential risks and lack of proven survival benefit of PLND. (c) 2024 The Asian Pacific Prostate Society. Published by Elsevier B.V. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
引用
收藏
页码:70 / 78
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] The Role of Pelvic Lymph Node Dissection During Radical Prostatectomy in Patients With Gleason 6 Intermediate-risk Prostate Cancer
    Mandel, Philipp
    Kriegmair, Maximilian C.
    Veleva, Valia
    Salomon, Georg
    Graefen, Markus
    Huland, Hartwig
    Tilki, Derya
    UROLOGY, 2016, 93 : 141 - 146
  • [42] SURVIVAL PATTERNS AMONG CLINICALLY NODE POSITIVE PROSTATE CANCER TREATED WITH RADICAL PROSTATECTOMY
    Giuseppe, Reitano
    Mohamed, Ahmed
    Jamie, O'Byrne
    Daniel, Roberson
    Umar, Ghaffar
    Spyridon, Basourakos
    Julian, Diaz-Cobo
    Stephen, Boorjian
    Igor, Frank
    Matthew, Gettman
    Matthew, Tollefson
    Jeffrey, Karnes R.
    UROLOGIC ONCOLOGY-SEMINARS AND ORIGINAL INVESTIGATIONS, 2025, 43 (03)
  • [43] Can sentinel pelvic lymph node dissection replace extended pelvic lymph node dissection in patients with prostate cancer?
    Janetschek, Guenter
    NATURE CLINICAL PRACTICE UROLOGY, 2007, 4 (12): : 636 - 637
  • [44] Can sentinel pelvic lymph node dissection replace extended pelvic lymph node dissection in patients with prostate cancer?
    Günter Janetschek
    Nature Clinical Practice Urology, 2007, 4 : 636 - 637
  • [45] Current status and therapeutic value of extended pelvic lymph node dissection during radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer
    Morizane, Shuichi
    Takenaka, Atsushi
    PROSTATE INTERNATIONAL, 2024, 12 (03) : 117 - 127
  • [46] Pelvic Lymph Node Dissection for Prostate Cancer: Frequency and Distribution of Nodal Metastases in a Contemporary Radical Prostatectomy Series
    Godoy, Guilherme
    von Bodman, Christian
    Chade, Daher C.
    Dillioglugil, Ozdal
    Eastham, James A.
    Fine, Samson W.
    Scardino, Peter T.
    Laudone, Vincent P.
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2012, 187 (06): : 2082 - 2086
  • [47] The impact of pelvic lymph node dissection at the time of radical prostatectomy on long-term prostate cancer outcomes
    Sathianathen, N.
    Furrer, M.
    Mulholland, C.
    Lawrentschuk, N.
    Corcoran, N. M.
    EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2023, 83 : S936 - S936
  • [48] Reconsideration on Clinical Benefit of Pelvic Lymph Node Dissection during Radical Prostatectomy for Clinically Localized Prostate Cancer
    Fujimoto, Naohiro
    Shiota, Masaki
    Tomisaki, Ikko
    Minato, Akinori
    Yahara, Katsuya
    UROLOGIA INTERNATIONALIS, 2019, 103 (02) : 125 - 136
  • [49] Pelvic Lymph Node Dissection in Prostate Cancer
    Briganti, Alberto
    Blute, Michael L.
    Eastham, James H.
    Graefen, Markus
    Heidenreich, Axel
    Karnes, Jeffrey R.
    Montorsi, Francesco
    Studer, Urs E.
    EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2009, 55 (06) : 1251 - 1265
  • [50] The role of lymph node dissection in salvage radical prostatectomy for patients with radiation recurrent prostate cancer
    Quhal, Fahad
    Rajwa, Pawel
    Mori, Keiic
    Laukhtina, Ekaterina
    Grossmann, Nico
    Schuettfort, Victor M.
    Koenig, Frederik
    Aydh, Abdulmajeed
    Motlagh, Reza S.
    Katayama, Satoshi
    Mostafai, Hadi
    Pradere, Benjamin
    Marra, Giancarlo
    Gontero, Paolo
    Mathieu, Romain
    Karakiewicz, Pierre I.
    Briganti, Alberto
    Shariat, Shahrokh F.
    Heidenreich, Axel
    PROSTATE, 2021, 81 (11): : 765 - 771