The clinical performance of dental resin composite repeatedly preheated: A randomized controlled clinical trial

被引:3
|
作者
Elkady, Mahmoud [1 ]
Abdelhakim, Safaa [2 ]
Riad, Mona [3 ]
机构
[1] Assiut Univ, Fac Dent, Conservat Dent Dept, Assiut, Egypt
[2] Minia Univ, Fac Dent, Operat Dent Dept, Mansoura, Egypt
[3] Cairo Univ Manial, Fac Dent, Conservat Dent Dept, 11 El Saraya St, Cairo 11553, Egypt
关键词
Bulk-fill resin composite; Repeated preheating; USPHS; Clinical performance; TEMPERATURE; RESTORATION;
D O I
10.1016/j.jdent.2024.104940
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
Objectives: To assess the clinical performance of class II restorations performed by repeatedly preheated resin composite "RC" at 68 degrees C up to ten times. Methods: 105 patients were selected and randomized into three groups, each comprising 35 patients. Each patient was provided with a single class II Bulk-fill resin composite "BF-RC" posterior restoration based on the number of preheating cycles; group I (H0): The BF-RC was packed non-heated, group II (H1): BF-RC preheated once, and group III(H10): BF-RC preheated ten cycles. These restorations were evaluated at 1, 3,6, and 12 months, using the modified United States Public Health Service "USPHS". Statistical analysis was performed using KruskalWallis test, Mann Whitney U test, and Friedmann test, where p = 0.05. Results: All the 105 restorations did not suffer from any clinical situation that recommended replacement regarding retention, fracture, secondary caries, or anatomical form. Although all performed restorations did have Alpha and Bravo scores with good clinical performance, the non-preheated RC restorations"" suffered from relatively inferior clinical performance through the follow-up period regarding marginal adaptation, marginal discoloration, and color matching when compared to preheated groups. One and ten times of preheating conducted better clinical performance. Conclusions: After 12-months follow-up, although no restoration needed replacement or repair in the 3 tested groups, restorations with single and ten times of preheating aided in better clinical performance of RC restorations compared to the non-preheated restorations. Preheating of RC for 10 times could be used safely with good clinical performance of restorations. Clinical Significance: By continually preheating RC syringe up to ten times, the dentist will not only benefit from the enhanced clinical performance and easiness of application but also will use preheated RC syringes without hesitation, relying on the absence of drawbacks related to multiple preheating cycles.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Comparison of two composite resin materials for splinting of dental luxation injuries: A double blind randomized controlled trial
    Raza, Misbah Ali
    Khan, Javeria Ali
    Akhtar, Hira
    Farooqui, Waqas Ahmed
    Faraz, Hira
    Hasan, Arshad
    DENTAL TRAUMATOLOGY, 2024, 40 (01) : 44 - 53
  • [32] Clinical efficacy of ceramic versus resin-based composite endocrowns in Chinese adults: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial
    Wang, Jilei
    Ling, Zhiting
    Zheng, Ziting
    Zheng, Chunqing
    Gai, Yawen
    Zeng, Yuting
    Zhu, Xiaoxia
    Chen, Liya
    Wu, Buling
    Yan, Wenjuan
    TRIALS, 2020, 21 (01)
  • [33] Clinical efficacy of ceramic versus resin-based composite endocrowns in Chinese adults: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial
    Jilei Wang
    Zhiting Ling
    Ziting Zheng
    Chunqing Zheng
    Yawen Gai
    Yuting Zeng
    Xiaoxia Zhu
    Liya Chen
    Buling Wu
    Wenjuan Yan
    Trials, 21
  • [34] Two-year clinical performance of indirect resin composite restorations in endodontically treated teeth with different cavity preparation designs: a randomized clinical trial
    Fouda, Hoda
    Hassanein, Olfat Elsayed
    Saber, Shehabeldin
    Haridy, Mohamed Fouad
    El Baz, Maha
    Ahmed, Hend Sayed
    Abuelezz, Ahmed
    BMC ORAL HEALTH, 2024, 24 (01):
  • [35] Comparison of the clinical performance of self-adhering flowable composite and resin-based pit and fissure sealant: a randomized clinical trial in pediatric patients
    Gisour, Elham Farokh
    Jahanimoghadam, Fatemeh
    Aftabi, Reyhaneh
    BMC ORAL HEALTH, 2024, 24 (01):
  • [36] Effect of an Additional Hydrophobic Adhesive Layer Application on the Clinical Performance of Class V Resin Composite Restorations: An 18-month Randomized Clinical Trial
    Berkman, M.
    Tuncer, S.
    Karabay, F.
    Demirci, M.
    Tekce, N.
    Baydemir, C.
    OPERATIVE DENTISTRY, 2024, 49 (06) : 642 - 654
  • [37] Randomized controlled clinical trial comparing two dental implants with different neck configurations
    Sanz-Martin, Ignacio
    Sanz-Sanchez, Ignacio
    Noguerol, Fernando
    Cok, Susy
    Ortiz-Vigon, Alberto
    Sanz, Mariano
    CLINICAL IMPLANT DENTISTRY AND RELATED RESEARCH, 2017, 19 (03) : 512 - 522
  • [38] Computer guided versus freehand dental implant surgery: Randomized controlled clinical trial
    Mahmoud, Nermine Ramadan
    Eldin, Mohamed Hatem Kamal
    Diab, Mai Hassan
    Mahmoud, Omar Samy
    Fekry, Yasser El-Sayed
    SAUDI DENTAL JOURNAL, 2024, 36 (11) : 1472 - 1476
  • [39] Ceramic laminate veneers luted with preheated resin composite: A 10-year clinical report
    Marcondes, Rogerio L.
    Lima, Veronica P.
    Isolan, Cristina P.
    Lima, Giana S.
    Moraes, Rafael R.
    CONTEMPORARY CLINICAL DENTISTRY, 2021, 12 (03) : 313 - 316
  • [40] Acceptability and effect of TiF4 on dental caries: a randomized controlled clinical trial
    de Souza, Beatriz Martines
    Silva, Mayara de Souza
    Braga, Aline Silva
    Soares dos Santos, Daiana Moreli
    Carvalho, Thamyris de Souza
    dos Santos, Natalia Mello
    Rios, Daniela
    Rabelo Buzalaf, Marilia Afonso
    Magalhaes, Ana Carolina
    BRAZILIAN ORAL RESEARCH, 2021, 35