Enhanced Recovery after Surgery in Open Fetal Spina Bifida Repair

被引:0
|
作者
Zepf, Julia [1 ,2 ]
Zuger, Anita [1 ,2 ]
Vonzun, Ladina [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Ruegg, Ladina [1 ,2 ]
Strubing, Nele [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Krahenmann, Franziska [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Meuli, Martin [2 ,4 ,5 ]
Mazzone, Luca [2 ,3 ,4 ,5 ,6 ]
Moehrlen, Ueli [2 ,3 ,4 ,5 ,6 ]
Ochsenbein-Kolble, Nicole [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Hosp Zurich, Dept Obstet, Zurich, Switzerland
[2] Univ Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
[3] Univ Zurich, Zurich Ctr Fetal Diag & Therapy, Zurich, Switzerland
[4] Univ Childrens Hosp Zurich, Spina Bifida Ctr, Zurich, Switzerland
[5] Univ Childrens Hosp Zurich, Childrens Res Ctr, Zurich, Switzerland
[6] Univ Children?s Hosp Zurich, Dept Pediat Surg, Zurich, Switzerland
关键词
Fetal surgery; Intrauterine surgery; Myelomeningocele; Spina bifida; Enhanced recovery after surgery; OPIOID-INDUCED CONSTIPATION; COMPARING IMMEDIATE; DELAYED REMOVAL; PAIN;
D O I
10.1159/000537758
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Introduction: For open fetal spina bifida (fSB) repair, a maternal laparotomy is required. Hence, enhanced maternal recovery after surgery (ERAS) is paramount. A revision of our ERAS protocol was made, including changes in operative techniques and postoperative pain management. This study investigates eventual benefits. Methods: Our study included 111 women with open fSB repair at our center. The old protocol group (group 1) either received a transverse incision of the fascia with transection of the rectus abdominis muscle (RAM) or a longitudinal incision of the fascia without RAM transection, depending on placental location. The new protocol required longitudinal incisions in all patients (group 2). Postoperative pain management was changed from tramadol to oxycodone/naloxone. Outcomes of the two different protocol groups were analyzed and compared regarding the primary endpoint, the length of hospital stay (LOS) after fetal surgery, as well as regarding the following secondary endpoints: postoperative pain scores, day of first mobilization, removal of urinary catheter, bowel movement, and the occurrence of maternal and fetal complications. Results: Out of 111 women, 82 (73.9%) were in group 1 and 29 (26.1%) were in group 2. Women in group 2 showed a significantly shorter LOS (18 [14-23] days vs. 27 [18-39] days, p = 0.002), duration until mobilization (3 [2-3] days vs. 3 [3-4] days, p = 0.03), and removal of urinary catheter (day 3 [3-3] vs. day 4 [3-4], p = 0.004). Group 2 less often received morphine subcutaneously (0% vs. 35.4%, p < 0.001) or intravenously (0% vs. 17.1%, p = 0.02) but more often oxycodone (69.0% vs. 18.3%, p < 0.001). No significant differences were seen regarding pain scores, bowel movement, and maternal and/or fetal complications. Conclusion: The new ERAS protocol that combined changes in surgical technique and pain medication led to better outcomes while reducing LOS. Continuous revisions of current ERAS protocols are essential to improve patient care continuously.
引用
收藏
页码:267 / 277
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Fetal Spina Bifida Repair in Obese Mothers: Is Maternal and Fetal Safety Compromised?
    Zepf, Julia
    Vonzun, Ladina
    Ruegg, Ladina
    Strubing, Nele
    Krahenmann, Franziska
    Meuli, Martin
    Mazzone, Luca
    Moehrlen, Ueli
    Ochsenbein-Kolble, Nicole
    FETAL DIAGNOSIS AND THERAPY, 2024, 51 (02) : 175 - 183
  • [42] Open surgery for in utero repair of spina bifida: Microneurosurgery versus standard technique - A systematic review
    Molina-Giraldo, Saulo
    Zapata Salcedo, Roberto
    Rojas Arias, Jose Luis
    Acuna Osorio, Edgar
    Pinto Quinones, Martha Lucia
    Restrepo, Hector Fabio
    Cruz-Martinez, Rogelio
    PRENATAL DIAGNOSIS, 2021, 41 (13) : 1615 - 1623
  • [43] Performance of open two-port fetoscopic fetal spina bifida repair in a newly developed program
    Miller, Jena L.
    Groves, Mari
    Faden, Majed
    Berman, Dave
    Murphy, Jamie
    Jelin, Eric
    Delp, Cassandra
    Baschat, Ahmet
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2019, 220 (01) : S149 - S150
  • [44] Outcomes of percutaneous fetoscopic open spina bifida (OSB) repair
    Chmait, Ramen H.
    Chu, Jason
    Kontopoulos, Eftichia V.
    Van Speybroeck, Alexander
    Pham, Huyen Q.
    Ponrartana, Skorn
    Chon, Andrew H.
    Llanes, Arlyn
    Korst, Lisa M.
    Quintero, Ruben A.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2021, 224 (02) : S56 - S56
  • [45] Indications for delivery after intrauterine repair of spina bifida
    Duong, J
    Bruner, J
    Heddings, A
    Reed, G
    Stone, L
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2001, 185 (06) : S240 - S240
  • [46] Magnetically Assisted Robotic Fetal Surgery for the Treatment of Spina Bifida
    Gervasoni, Simone
    Lussi, Jonas
    Viviani, Silvia
    Boehler, Quentin
    Ochsenbein, Nicole
    Moehrlen, Ueli
    Nelson, Bradley J.
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON MEDICAL ROBOTICS AND BIONICS, 2022, 4 (01): : 85 - 93
  • [47] Maternal-fetal surgery for spina bifida: Future perspectives
    Joyeux, L.
    Chalouhi, G. E.
    Ville, Y.
    Sapin, E.
    JOURNAL DE GYNECOLOGIE OBSTETRIQUE ET BIOLOGIE DE LA REPRODUCTION, 2014, 43 (06): : 443 - 454
  • [48] Contemporary Outcomes of a National Fetal Spina Bifida Surgery Service
    Kik, Charlotte C.
    Kunpalin, Yada
    Kulkarni, Abhaya V.
    Varghese, Abby
    Abbasi, Nimrah
    Ryan, Greg
    Dekoninck, Philip L. J.
    Church, Paige T.
    Malhotra, Armaan
    Raghuram, Kamini
    Kelly, Edmond
    Van Mieghem, Tim
    PRENATAL DIAGNOSIS, 2024, 44 (13) : 1635 - 1640
  • [49] Fetal spina bifida - Response
    Stiefel, Dorothea
    Copp, Andrew J.
    Meuli, Martin
    JOURNAL OF NEUROSURGERY, 2007, 106 (03) : 212 - 212
  • [50] Outcomes of late open fetal surgery for intrauterine spina bifida repair after 26 weeks. Should we extend the Management of Myelomeningocele Study time window?
    Etchegaray, Adolfo
    Cruz-Martinez, Rogelio
    Daniel Russo, Ricardo
    Martinez-Rodriguez, Miguel
    Palma, Fernando
    Chavelas-Ochoa, Felipe
    Beruti, Ernesto
    Lopez-Briones, Hugo
    Fregonese, Rodolfo
    Villalobos-Gomez, Rosa
    Gamez-Varela, Alma
    Allegrotti, Hernan
    Aguilar-Vidales, Karla
    PRENATAL DIAGNOSIS, 2022, 42 (04) : 495 - 501