Enhanced Recovery after Surgery in Open Fetal Spina Bifida Repair

被引:0
|
作者
Zepf, Julia [1 ,2 ]
Zuger, Anita [1 ,2 ]
Vonzun, Ladina [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Ruegg, Ladina [1 ,2 ]
Strubing, Nele [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Krahenmann, Franziska [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Meuli, Martin [2 ,4 ,5 ]
Mazzone, Luca [2 ,3 ,4 ,5 ,6 ]
Moehrlen, Ueli [2 ,3 ,4 ,5 ,6 ]
Ochsenbein-Kolble, Nicole [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Hosp Zurich, Dept Obstet, Zurich, Switzerland
[2] Univ Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
[3] Univ Zurich, Zurich Ctr Fetal Diag & Therapy, Zurich, Switzerland
[4] Univ Childrens Hosp Zurich, Spina Bifida Ctr, Zurich, Switzerland
[5] Univ Childrens Hosp Zurich, Childrens Res Ctr, Zurich, Switzerland
[6] Univ Children?s Hosp Zurich, Dept Pediat Surg, Zurich, Switzerland
关键词
Fetal surgery; Intrauterine surgery; Myelomeningocele; Spina bifida; Enhanced recovery after surgery; OPIOID-INDUCED CONSTIPATION; COMPARING IMMEDIATE; DELAYED REMOVAL; PAIN;
D O I
10.1159/000537758
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Introduction: For open fetal spina bifida (fSB) repair, a maternal laparotomy is required. Hence, enhanced maternal recovery after surgery (ERAS) is paramount. A revision of our ERAS protocol was made, including changes in operative techniques and postoperative pain management. This study investigates eventual benefits. Methods: Our study included 111 women with open fSB repair at our center. The old protocol group (group 1) either received a transverse incision of the fascia with transection of the rectus abdominis muscle (RAM) or a longitudinal incision of the fascia without RAM transection, depending on placental location. The new protocol required longitudinal incisions in all patients (group 2). Postoperative pain management was changed from tramadol to oxycodone/naloxone. Outcomes of the two different protocol groups were analyzed and compared regarding the primary endpoint, the length of hospital stay (LOS) after fetal surgery, as well as regarding the following secondary endpoints: postoperative pain scores, day of first mobilization, removal of urinary catheter, bowel movement, and the occurrence of maternal and fetal complications. Results: Out of 111 women, 82 (73.9%) were in group 1 and 29 (26.1%) were in group 2. Women in group 2 showed a significantly shorter LOS (18 [14-23] days vs. 27 [18-39] days, p = 0.002), duration until mobilization (3 [2-3] days vs. 3 [3-4] days, p = 0.03), and removal of urinary catheter (day 3 [3-3] vs. day 4 [3-4], p = 0.004). Group 2 less often received morphine subcutaneously (0% vs. 35.4%, p < 0.001) or intravenously (0% vs. 17.1%, p = 0.02) but more often oxycodone (69.0% vs. 18.3%, p < 0.001). No significant differences were seen regarding pain scores, bowel movement, and maternal and/or fetal complications. Conclusion: The new ERAS protocol that combined changes in surgical technique and pain medication led to better outcomes while reducing LOS. Continuous revisions of current ERAS protocols are essential to improve patient care continuously.
引用
收藏
页码:267 / 277
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Enhanced recovery after fetal spina bifida surgery: global practice
    Nulens, K.
    Kunpalin, Y.
    Nijs, K.
    Carvalho, J. C. A.
    Pollard, L.
    Abbasi, N.
    Ryan, G.
    Mieghem, T. Van
    ULTRASOUND IN OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY, 2024, 64 (05) : 669 - 677
  • [2] Fetal surgery for open spina bifida
    Sacco, Adalina
    Ushakov, Fred
    Thompson, Dominic
    Peebles, Donald
    Pandya, Pranav
    De Coppi, Paolo
    Wimalasundera, Ruwan
    Attilakos, George
    David, Anna Louise
    Deprest, Jan
    OBSTETRICIAN & GYNAECOLOGIST, 2019, 21 (04): : 271 - 282
  • [3] Open Spina Bifida: Why Not Fetal Surgery?
    Mazzone, Luca
    Moehrlen, Ueli
    Casanova, Barbara
    Ryf, Samira
    Ochsenbein-Kolble, Nicole
    Zimmermann, Roland
    Kraehenmann, Franziska
    Meuli, Martin
    FETAL DIAGNOSIS AND THERAPY, 2019, 45 (06) : 430 - 434
  • [4] Clinical and Histologic Evaluation of the Hysterotomy Site and Fetal Membranes after Open Fetal Surgery for Fetal Spina Bifida Repair
    Ochsenbein-Kolble, Nicole
    Brandt, Simone
    Bode, Peter
    Krahenmann, Franziska
    Husler, Margaret
    Mohrlen, Ueli
    Mazzone, Luca
    Meuli, Martin
    Zimmermann, Roland
    FETAL DIAGNOSIS AND THERAPY, 2019, 45 (04) : 248 - 255
  • [5] Open Fetal Microneurosurgery for Intrauterine Spina Bifida Repair
    Cruz-Martinez, Rogelio
    Chavelas-Ochoa, Felipe
    Martinez-Rodriguez, Miguel
    Aguilar-Vidales, Karla
    Gamez-Varela, Alma
    Luna-Garcia, Jonahtan
    Lopez-Briones, Hugo
    Chavez-Vega, Joel
    Augusto Perez-Calatayud, Angel
    Alejandro Diaz-Carrillo, Manuel
    Ahumada-Angulo, Edgar
    Castelo-Vargas, Andrea
    Chavez-Gonzalez, Erendira
    Juarez-Martinez, Israel
    Villalobos-Gomez, Rosa
    Rebolledo-Fernandez, Carlos
    FETAL DIAGNOSIS AND THERAPY, 2021, 48 (03) : 163 - 173
  • [6] Advances in Fetal Surgical Repair of Open Spina Bifida
    Chmait, Ramen H. H.
    Monson, Martha A. A.
    Chon, Andrew H. H.
    OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2023, 141 (03): : 505 - 521
  • [7] Global Policy and Practice for Intrauterine Fetal Resuscitation During Fetal Surgery for Open Spina Bifida Repair
    Gallagher, Katie
    Crombag, Neeltje
    Prashar, Kavita
    Deprest, Jan
    Ourselin, Sebastien
    David, Anna L.
    Marlow, Neil
    JAMA NETWORK OPEN, 2023, 6 (04) : e239855
  • [8] Fetal surgery for spina bifida
    Dewan, Michael C.
    Wellons, John C., III
    JOURNAL OF NEUROSURGERY-PEDIATRICS, 2019, 24 (02) : 105 - 114
  • [9] Fetal surgery for spina bifida
    不详
    CANADIAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION JOURNAL, 1999, 160 (01) : 17 - 17
  • [10] Fetal surgery for spina bifida
    Magram, G
    LANCET, 1999, 353 (9150): : 406 - 406