Prediction of the Global Distribution of Arhopalus rusticus under Future Climate Change Scenarios of the CMIP6

被引:2
|
作者
Fan, Yuhang [1 ]
Zhang, Xuemei [2 ]
Zhou, Yuting [1 ]
Zong, Shixiang [1 ]
机构
[1] Beijing Forestry Univ, Coll Forestry, Key Lab Beijing Control Forest Pests, Beijing 100083, Peoples R China
[2] Shenyang Agr Univ, Coll Forestry, Shenyang 110866, Peoples R China
来源
FORESTS | 2024年 / 15卷 / 06期
基金
国家重点研发计划;
关键词
Arhopalus rusticus; climate change; CMIP6; potential distribution; POTENTIAL DISTRIBUTION; PERFORMANCE; ACCURACY; MODELS; KAPPA; SEX;
D O I
10.3390/f15060955
中图分类号
S7 [林业];
学科分类号
0829 ; 0907 ;
摘要
Arhopalus rusticus is a significant forestry pest known for its destructive impact on various host plants. This species, commonly found in coniferous forests across the Northern Hemisphere, has successfully spread to regions like New Zealand, Australia, and South America. This research is based on the known distribution sites of A. rusticus. Projections are made for the potential global distribution of A. rusticus under historical climatic conditions (1970-2000) and future climatic conditions (2081-2100) for the four forcing scenarios of the Coupled Model International Comparison Program 6 (CMIP6). The aim was to analyze the effects of climate change on the distribution range of this pest and its invasion trend in the southern hemisphere, and to support relevant departments in enhancing the effectiveness of forestry pest control strategies. The study utilized the Biomod2 software package in R to compare six models: generalized linear models (GLMs), generalized additive models (GAMs), multivariate adaptive regression splines (MARSs), artificial neural networks (ANNs), classification and regression trees (CTAs), and random forests (RFs) for modeling species distributions. The optimal model was selected based on evaluation indexes such as AUC and TSS. Projections of A. rusticus distribution under historical and future climate scenarios were created. The prediction results were visualized using ArcGIS software (version 10.2) to classify fitness levels and calculate distribution areas. Based on evaluation metrics, random forests (RFs) demonstrated the highest average assessment index scores, indicating high prediction accuracy (AUC = 0.99, TSS = 0.91, Kappa = 0.93). Model predictions revealed that, under historical climatic conditions, A. rusticus was predominantly found in northern Europe, eastern Asia, eastern and southwestern coastal regions of North America, and there were also highly suitable regions in parts of the southern hemisphere, including central and southwestern Argentina, southern Australia, New Zealand, and South Africa. Among these models, each of the CMIP6's different climate prediction scenarios had a significant impact on the predicted distribution of A. rusticus. The SSP126 scenario depicted the broadest range of suitability, while the SSP585 scenario presented the narrowest and, overall, the extent of highly suitable regions was contracting. Multi-model predictions suggested that the potential distribution area of A. rusticus during the period of 2081-2100 would likely expand compared to that of 1970-2000, ranging from an increase of 1.13% (SSP126) up to 6.61% (SSP585), positively correlating with the level of radiative forcing. Notably, the most substantial growth was observed in potentially low-suitability region, escalating from 1.17% (SSP126) to 5.55% (SSP585). The distribution of A. rusticus shows decreasing trends from coastal areas to inland areas and from high to low level suitability of regions, and further expansion into the southern hemisphere under future climate conditions. Therefore, quarantine efforts at ports of entry should be strengthened in areas that are not currently infested but are at risk of invasion, and precise preventive measures should be strengthened in areas that are at risk of further expansion under future climatic conditions to prevent its spread to inland areas.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Climate change in the High Mountain Asia in CMIP6
    Lalande, Mickael
    Menegoz, Martin
    Krinner, Gerhard
    Naegeli, Kathrin
    Wunderle, Stefan
    EARTH SYSTEM DYNAMICS, 2021, 12 (04) : 1061 - 1098
  • [42] Future Global Convective Environments in CMIP6 Models
    Lepore, Chiara
    Abernathey, Ryan
    Henderson, Naomi
    Allen, John T.
    Tippett, Michael K.
    EARTHS FUTURE, 2021, 9 (12)
  • [43] Significant contribution of bias correction methods to uncertainty in future runoff projections under CMIP6 climate change
    Chae, Seung Taek
    Chung, Eun-Sung
    JOURNAL OF HYDROLOGY-REGIONAL STUDIES, 2024, 56
  • [44] Future Arctic Climate Change in CMIP6 Strikingly Intensified by NEMO-Family Climate Models
    Pan, Rongrong
    Shu, Qi
    Wang, Qiang
    Wang, Shizhu
    Song, Zhenya
    He, Yan
    Qiao, Fangli
    GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH LETTERS, 2023, 50 (04)
  • [45] Predicting the potential distribution range of Batocera horsfieldi under CMIP6 climate change using the MaxEnt model
    Wei, Xinju
    Xu, Danping
    Liu, Quanwei
    Wu, Yuhan
    Zhuo, Zhihang
    JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC ENTOMOLOGY, 2024, 117 (01) : 187 - 198
  • [46] Future changes in soil salinization across Central Asia under CMIP6 forcing scenarios
    Dong, Xin
    Ding, Jianli
    Ge, Xiangyu
    LAND DEGRADATION & DEVELOPMENT, 2024, 35 (13) : 3981 - 3998
  • [47] Ozone Variation Trends under Different CMIP6 Scenarios
    Shang, Lin
    Luo, Jiali
    Wang, Chunxiao
    ATMOSPHERE, 2021, 12 (01)
  • [48] Assessing the influence of climate change on multiple climate indices in Nepal using CMIP6 global climate models
    Bastola, Shiksha
    Cho, Jaepil
    Kam, Jonghun
    Jung, Younghun
    ATMOSPHERIC RESEARCH, 2024, 311
  • [49] Comparison of CMIP6 historical climate simulations and future projected warming to an empirical model of global climate
    McBride, Laura A.
    Hope, Austin P.
    Canty, Timothy P.
    Bennett, Brian F.
    Tribett, Walter R.
    Salawitch, Ross J.
    EARTH SYSTEM DYNAMICS, 2021, 12 (02) : 545 - 579
  • [50] Projections of Greenland climate change from CMIP5 and CMIP6
    Zhang, Qinglin
    Huai, Baojuan
    Ding, Minghu
    Sun, Weijun
    Liu, Weigang
    Yan, Jinpei
    Zhao, Shuhui
    Wang, Yetang
    Wang, Yuzhe
    Wang, Lei
    Che, Jiahang
    Dou, Jiahui
    Kang, Limin
    GLOBAL AND PLANETARY CHANGE, 2024, 232