Prediction of the Global Distribution of Arhopalus rusticus under Future Climate Change Scenarios of the CMIP6

被引:2
|
作者
Fan, Yuhang [1 ]
Zhang, Xuemei [2 ]
Zhou, Yuting [1 ]
Zong, Shixiang [1 ]
机构
[1] Beijing Forestry Univ, Coll Forestry, Key Lab Beijing Control Forest Pests, Beijing 100083, Peoples R China
[2] Shenyang Agr Univ, Coll Forestry, Shenyang 110866, Peoples R China
来源
FORESTS | 2024年 / 15卷 / 06期
基金
国家重点研发计划;
关键词
Arhopalus rusticus; climate change; CMIP6; potential distribution; POTENTIAL DISTRIBUTION; PERFORMANCE; ACCURACY; MODELS; KAPPA; SEX;
D O I
10.3390/f15060955
中图分类号
S7 [林业];
学科分类号
0829 ; 0907 ;
摘要
Arhopalus rusticus is a significant forestry pest known for its destructive impact on various host plants. This species, commonly found in coniferous forests across the Northern Hemisphere, has successfully spread to regions like New Zealand, Australia, and South America. This research is based on the known distribution sites of A. rusticus. Projections are made for the potential global distribution of A. rusticus under historical climatic conditions (1970-2000) and future climatic conditions (2081-2100) for the four forcing scenarios of the Coupled Model International Comparison Program 6 (CMIP6). The aim was to analyze the effects of climate change on the distribution range of this pest and its invasion trend in the southern hemisphere, and to support relevant departments in enhancing the effectiveness of forestry pest control strategies. The study utilized the Biomod2 software package in R to compare six models: generalized linear models (GLMs), generalized additive models (GAMs), multivariate adaptive regression splines (MARSs), artificial neural networks (ANNs), classification and regression trees (CTAs), and random forests (RFs) for modeling species distributions. The optimal model was selected based on evaluation indexes such as AUC and TSS. Projections of A. rusticus distribution under historical and future climate scenarios were created. The prediction results were visualized using ArcGIS software (version 10.2) to classify fitness levels and calculate distribution areas. Based on evaluation metrics, random forests (RFs) demonstrated the highest average assessment index scores, indicating high prediction accuracy (AUC = 0.99, TSS = 0.91, Kappa = 0.93). Model predictions revealed that, under historical climatic conditions, A. rusticus was predominantly found in northern Europe, eastern Asia, eastern and southwestern coastal regions of North America, and there were also highly suitable regions in parts of the southern hemisphere, including central and southwestern Argentina, southern Australia, New Zealand, and South Africa. Among these models, each of the CMIP6's different climate prediction scenarios had a significant impact on the predicted distribution of A. rusticus. The SSP126 scenario depicted the broadest range of suitability, while the SSP585 scenario presented the narrowest and, overall, the extent of highly suitable regions was contracting. Multi-model predictions suggested that the potential distribution area of A. rusticus during the period of 2081-2100 would likely expand compared to that of 1970-2000, ranging from an increase of 1.13% (SSP126) up to 6.61% (SSP585), positively correlating with the level of radiative forcing. Notably, the most substantial growth was observed in potentially low-suitability region, escalating from 1.17% (SSP126) to 5.55% (SSP585). The distribution of A. rusticus shows decreasing trends from coastal areas to inland areas and from high to low level suitability of regions, and further expansion into the southern hemisphere under future climate conditions. Therefore, quarantine efforts at ports of entry should be strengthened in areas that are not currently infested but are at risk of invasion, and precise preventive measures should be strengthened in areas that are at risk of further expansion under future climatic conditions to prevent its spread to inland areas.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Future Climate Under CMIP6 Solar Activity Scenarios
    Sedlacek, Jan
    Sukhodolov, Timofei
    Egorova, Tania
    Karagodin-Doyennel, Arseniy
    Rozanov, Eugene
    EARTH AND SPACE SCIENCE, 2023, 10 (07)
  • [2] Future Global River Ice in CMIP6 Models under Climate Change
    Lin, Yu
    Lu, Haishen
    Lindenschmidt, Karl-Erich
    Yu, Zhongbo
    Zhu, Yonghua
    Liu, Mingwen
    Chen, Tingxing
    JOURNAL OF APPLIED METEOROLOGY AND CLIMATOLOGY, 2024, 63 (10) : 1191 - 1206
  • [3] Quantifying economic impacts of climate change under nine future emission scenarios within CMIP6
    Chen, Yating
    Liu, Aobo
    Cheng, Xiao
    SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT, 2020, 703 (703)
  • [4] Future temperature and salinity in Puget Sound, Washington State, under CMIP6 climate change scenarios
    Walker, Stevie
    Mozaria-Luna, Hem Nalini
    Kaplan, Isaac
    Petatan-Ramirez, David
    JOURNAL OF WATER AND CLIMATE CHANGE, 2022, 13 (12) : 4255 - 4272
  • [5] Artificial Neural Networks for Flood Prediction in Current and CMIP6 Climate Change Scenarios
    Brandao, Abderraman R. Amorim
    Schwamback, Dimaghi
    de Menezes Filho, Frederico C. M.
    Oliveira, Paulo T. S.
    Fava, Maria Clara
    JOURNAL OF FLOOD RISK MANAGEMENT, 2025, 18 (01):
  • [6] Future climate suitability of Hemileia vastatrix in arabica coffee under CMIP6 scenarios
    Aparecido, Lucas Eduardo de Oliveira
    Torsoni, Guilherme Botega
    Lorencone, Joao Antonio
    Lorencone, Pedro Antonio
    de Lima, Rafael Fausto
    de Souza Rolim, Glauco
    Saqui, Diego
    de Oliveira Junior, Geraldo Gomes
    JOURNAL OF THE SCIENCE OF FOOD AND AGRICULTURE, 2025, 105 (01) : 394 - 421
  • [7] Flood inundation mapping under climate change scenarios: insights from CMIP6
    Sadiqzai, Hazrat Younus
    Khan, Afed Ullah
    Khan, Fayaz Ahmad
    Ullah, Basir
    Khan, Jehanzeb
    WATER PRACTICE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2024, 19 (06) : 2419 - 2441
  • [8] Evaluation of Past and Future Climate Trends under CMIP6 Scenarios for the UBNB (Abay), Ethiopia
    Alaminie, Addis A.
    Tilahun, Seifu A.
    Legesse, Solomon A.
    Zimale, Fasikaw A.
    Tarkegn, Gashaw Bimrew
    Jury, Mark R.
    WATER, 2021, 13 (15)
  • [9] Future projections of worst floods and dam break analysis in Mahanadi River Basin under CMIP6 climate change scenarios
    Roniki Anjaneyulu
    Ratnakar Swain
    Mukunda Dev Behera
    Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 2023, 195
  • [10] Future projections of worst floods and dam break analysis in Mahanadi River Basin under CMIP6 climate change scenarios
    Anjaneyulu, Roniki
    Swain, Ratnakar
    Behera, Mukunda Dev
    ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING AND ASSESSMENT, 2023, 195 (10)