Fertility Outcomes in Women undergoing Assisted Reproductive Treatments after COVID-19 Vaccination: A Prospective Cohort Study

被引:0
|
作者
Satwik, Ruma [1 ]
Majumdar, Abha [1 ]
Mittal, Shweta [1 ]
Tiwari, Neeti [1 ]
Majumdar, Gaurav [1 ]
机构
[1] Sir Ganga Ram Hosp, Inst Obstet & Gynecol, Ctr IVF & Human Reprod, New Delhi, India
关键词
COVID-19; Vaccination; In Vitro Fertilization; Pregnancy Loss; Pregnancy Outcome; PREGNANCY; SAFETY;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Background: Vaccination against Coronavirus-19 disease (COVID-19) was widely administered from 2021 onwards. There is little information on how this vaccine affected fertility after assisted-reproductive-technology (ART). The aim of this study therefore was to determine if COVID-19 vaccination or time-since-vaccination influenced ART outcomes. Materials and Methods: In this prospective cohort study, 502 oocyte-retrieval-cycles and 582 subsequent embryo-transfer-cycles were grouped based on COVID-19 vaccine status of the female partner into those with no-exposure, 1-dose and >2-dose exposure. Within the exposed cohort, time-since-last-vaccination to embryotransfer-cycle (T tr ) was calculated in days. Main outcomes were mean-total-utilizable-embryos, mean-oocyteutilization-rates and cumulative-ongoing-pregnancy-rates per oocyte-retrieval-cycle, and ongoing-pregnancy and pregnancy-loss-rates per embryo-transfer cycle. The Beta-coefficient (ss) was calculated using linear regression for mean-total-utilizable-embryos and mean-oocyte-utilization-rates and adjusted-odds-ratio (OR) was calculated for cumulative-ongoing-pregnancy-rates, ongoing-pregnancy and pregnancy-loss-rates using binomial logistic regression. Influence of T (tr) on embryo-transfer outcomes was estimated using receiver-operator-curve (ROC) analysis and cut-offs determined that influenced embryo-transfer outcomes. Results: Mean-total-utilizable-embryos and mean-oocyte-utilization-rate per oocyte-retrieval-cycle in no-exposure, 1-dose and >2 dose were 2.7 +/- 1.8 vs. 2.5 +/- 1.9 vs. 2.7 +/- 2.0, P=0.78, (ss=0.42, 95% confidence-interval (CI)=0.15 to 0.69) and 21.2 +/- 13.2 vs. 25.1 +/- 19.0 vs. 26.7 +/- 18.8, P=0.08, (ss=3.94, 95% CI=1.26 to 6.23) respectively. Ongoing-pregnancy-rates and pregnancy-loss-rates per embryo-transfer-cycle were 27.3% vs. 24.4% vs. 32.5% (aOR=1.38, 95% CI=0.3-5.6, P=0.52), and 13.6% vs. 13.4% vs. 15.2%, (aOR=0.97, 95% CI=0.18-5.2, P=0.97) respectively. Cumulative-ongoing-pregnancy-rates per oocyte-retrieval-cycle were 36.5% vs. 34.5% vs. 35.5% (aOR=1.53, 95% CI=0.57 to 4.07, P=0.35). Median T (tr) was 146 days (IQR: 80-220). T (tr) negatively affected ongoing pregnancy rates for intervals <60 days (AUC=0.59, 95% CI=0.54-0.66, P<0.01). For T(tr) >60 vs. <60 days, the aOR for ongoing-pregnancy-per-embryo-transfer-cycle was 2.85 (95% CI=1.50-5.46, P<0.01). Conclusion: Covid-19 vaccination does not negatively influence embryological-outcomes or cumulative-ongoing-pregnancies after ART-treatments. Duration since vaccination may have a weak negative effect on embryo-transfer-outcomes performed within 60 days.
引用
收藏
页码:207 / 214
页数:117
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Bacterial vaginosis in a subfertile population undergoing fertility treatments: a prospective cohort study
    Marjolein M. van den Tweel
    Ellen H.A. van den Munckhof
    Moniek van der Zanden
    Anco C. Molijn
    Jan M.M. van Lith
    Saskia Le Cessie
    Kim E. Boers
    Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics, 2024, 41 : 441 - 450
  • [32] Bacterial vaginosis in a subfertile population undergoing fertility treatments: a prospective cohort study
    van den Tweel, Marjolein M.
    van den Munckhof, Ellen H. A.
    van der Zanden, Moniek
    Molijn, Anco C.
    van Lith, Jan M. M.
    Le Cessie, Saskia
    Boers, Kim E.
    JOURNAL OF ASSISTED REPRODUCTION AND GENETICS, 2024, 41 (02) : 441 - 450
  • [33] Bacterial vaginosis in a subfertile population undergoing fertility treatments: a prospective cohort study
    Van den Tweel, M.
    Van den Munckhof, E.
    Van der Zanden, M.
    Molijn, A.
    Van Lith, J.
    Le Cessie, S.
    Boers, K.
    HUMAN REPRODUCTION, 2023, 38
  • [34] Maternal and neonatal outcomes in women with COVID-19: A retrospective cohort study
    Shiadeh, Malihe Nourollahpour
    Zare, Ommolbanin
    Moosazadeh, Mahmood
    Kiapour, Azadeh
    Elyasi, Sima
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF REPRODUCTIVE BIOMEDICINE, 2024, 22 (10) : 793 - 800
  • [35] Breakthrough infections, hospital admissions, and mortality after major COVID-19 vaccination profiles: a prospective cohort study
    Wichaidit, Mingkwan
    Nopsopon, Tanawin
    Sunan, Krittiyaporn
    Phutrakool, Phanupong
    Ruchikachorn, Puripant
    Wanvarie, Dittaya
    Pratanwanich, Ploy Naruemon
    Cheewaruangroj, Nontawit
    Punyabukkana, Proadpran
    Pongpirul, Krit
    LANCET REGIONAL HEALTH - SOUTHEAST ASIA, 2023, 8
  • [36] Neonatal Outcomes After COVID-19 Vaccination in Pregnancy
    Norman, Mikael
    Magnus, Maria C.
    Soderling, Jonas
    Juliusson, Petur B.
    Naver, Lars
    Ortqvist, Anne K.
    Haberg, Siri
    Stephansson, Olof
    JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2024, 331 (05): : 396 - 407
  • [37] Reassuring transfer outcomes after COVID-19 vaccination
    Usmanova, Nazokat
    Hipp, Heather S.
    FERTILITY AND STERILITY, 2022, 117 (05) : 980 - 980
  • [38] Safety of COVID-19 vaccination in pregnant women: A study of the adverse perinatal outcomes
    Kugelman, Nir
    Riskin, Arieh
    Kedar, Reuven
    Riskin-Mashiah, Shlomit
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGY & OBSTETRICS, 2023, 161 (01) : 298 - 302
  • [39] Psychiatric disorders in women and men up to five years after undergoing assisted reproductive technology treatment ? a prospective cohort study
    Volgsten, Helena
    Schmidt, Lone
    Svanberg, Agneta Skoog
    Ekselius, Lisa
    Poromaa, Inger Sundstrom
    HUMAN FERTILITY, 2019, 22 (04) : 277 - 282
  • [40] The Canadian COVID-19 Prospective Cohort Study
    Herridge, M. S.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF RESPIRATORY AND CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 2024, 209