Quantitative pupillometry as a biomarker for prediction of return to play in mild traumatic brain injury: a Military Traumatic Brain Injury Initiative study

被引:0
|
作者
Dengler, Bradley A. [1 ,2 ]
Meister, Melissa [2 ]
Aderman, Michael [3 ]
Malvasi, Steven R. [3 ]
Ross, Jeremy D. [3 ]
Fu, Adele [1 ,4 ]
Haight, Thaddeus [1 ,4 ]
Bartanusz, Viktor [1 ,4 ]
Boulter, Jason H. [2 ]
Rudolph, Jackson [5 ]
Cameron, Kenneth L. [3 ,6 ]
机构
[1] Mil Traumat Brain Injury Initiat MTBI 2, Bethesda, MD 20814 USA
[2] Walter Reed Natl Mil Med Ctr, Dept Neurosurg, Bethesda, MD USA
[3] United States Mil Acad, Keller Army Community Hosp, John A Feagin Sports Med Fellowship, New York, NY USA
[4] Henry M Jackson Fdn Adv Mil Med, Bethesda, MD USA
[5] Uniformed Serv Univ Hlth Sci, F Edward Herbert Sch Med, Bethesda, MD USA
[6] Uniformed Serv Univ Hlth Sci, Dept Phys Med & Rehabil, Bethesda, MD USA
关键词
concussion; mild traumatic brain injury; mTBI; return to play; quantitative pupillometry; SPORT-RELATED CONCUSSION;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
OBJECTIVE This study aimed to determine the validity of quantitative pupillometry to predict the length of time for return to full activity/duty after a mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI) in a cohort of injured cadets at West Point. METHODS Each subject received baseline (T0) quantitative pupillometry, in addition to evaluation with the Balance Error Scoring System (BESS), Standardized Assessment of Concussion (SAC), and Sport Concussion Assessment Tool 5th Edition Symptom Survey (SCAT5). Repeat assessments using the same parameters were conducted within 48 hours of injury (T1), at the beginning of progressive return to activity (T2), and at the completion of progressive return to activity protocols (T3). Pupillary metrics were compared on the basis of length of time to return to full play/duty and the clinical scores. RESULTS The authors' statistical analyses found correlations between pupillometry measures at T1, including endinitial diameter and maximum constriction velocity, with larger change and faster constriction predicting earlier return to play. There was also an association with maximum constriction velocity at baseline (T0), predicting faster return to play. CONCLUSIONS The authors conclude that that pupillometry may be a valuable tool for assessing time to return to duty from mTBI by providing a measure of baseline resiliency to mTBI and/or autonomic dysfunction in the acute phase after mTBI.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Prognostic role of quantitative pupillometry in traumatic brain injury: a scoping review
    Esmaeili, Danoosh
    Hosseini, Ali
    NEUROLOGICAL SCIENCES, 2025,
  • [22] Mild traumatic brain injury: not always a mild injury
    Schellenberg, Morgan
    Arase, Miharu
    Wong, Monica D.
    Demetriades, Demetrios
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF TRAUMA AND EMERGENCY SURGERY, 2024, 50 (04) : 1229 - 1235
  • [23] Methods for Prediction Research in Mild Traumatic Brain Injury
    Cnossen, Maryse C.
    Steyerberg, Ewout W.
    Lingsma, Hester F.
    JOURNAL OF NEUROTRAUMA, 2017, 34 (02) : 540 - 540
  • [24] Predictors for Return to Work in Subjects with Mild Traumatic Brain Injury
    Vikane, Eirik
    Hellstrom, Torgeir
    Roe, Cecilie
    Bautz-Holter, Erik
    Assmus, Jorg
    Skouen, Jan Sture
    BEHAVIOURAL NEUROLOGY, 2016, 2016
  • [25] Return to Pre-Injury Work Following Mild Traumatic Brain Injury
    Kahan, Michael
    Jones, Kelly M.
    Balalla, Shivanthi
    McPherson, Kathryn
    Stedman, Elisabeth
    Feigin, Valery L.
    BRAIN IMPAIRMENT, 2018, 19 (02) : 153 - 165
  • [26] Public understanding of mild traumatic brain injury in the British military
    Marimuther, Vicknaeshwari
    Brown, Dora
    Coyle, Adrian
    BRAIN INJURY, 2012, 26 (4-5) : 618 - 619
  • [27] Quantitative pupillometry in patients with traumatic brain injury and loss of consciousness: A prospective pilot study
    Traylor, Jeffrey, I
    El Ahmadieh, Tarek Y.
    Bedros, Nicole M.
    Al Adli, Nadeem
    Stutzman, Sonja E.
    Venkatachalam, Aardhra M.
    Pernik, Mark N.
    Collum, C. Munro
    Douglas, Peter M.
    Aiyagari, Venkatesh
    Bagley, Carlos A.
    Olson, DaiWai M.
    Aoun, Salah G.
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL NEUROSCIENCE, 2021, 91 : 88 - 92
  • [28] Neurosensory sequelae of mild traumatic brain injury: The military experience
    Hoffer, Michael
    Balaban, Carey
    Perez, Colleen
    Johnson, Christopher
    Murphy, Sara
    Gottshall, Kim
    BRAIN INJURY, 2014, 28 (5-6) : 690 - 690
  • [29] Assessment of Oculomotor Functions as a Biomarker in Mild Traumatic Brain Injury
    Lunkova, Ekaterina
    Chen, Jen-Kai
    Saluja, Rajeet Singh
    Ptito, Alain
    NEUROTRAUMA REPORTS, 2024, 5 (01): : 628 - 639
  • [30] Diffusion tensor imaging A biomarker for mild traumatic brain injury?
    Bigler, Erin D.
    Bazarian, Jeffrey J.
    NEUROLOGY, 2010, 74 (08) : 626 - 627