The analgesic effect of ultrasound-guided cervical erector spinae block in arthroscopic shoulder surgery: a randomized controlled clinical trial

被引:2
|
作者
Zhu, Manhua [1 ,2 ]
Zhou, Ruifen [1 ,2 ]
Wang, Lingzhi [1 ,2 ]
Ying, Qilu [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Ningbo Univ, Affiliated LiHuiLi Hosp, Dept Anesthesiol, 57 Xingning Rd, Ningbo 315040, Zhejiang, Peoples R China
[2] Ningbo Univ, Hlth Sci Ctr, 818 Fenghua Rd, Ningbo 315211, Zhejiang, Peoples R China
来源
BMC ANESTHESIOLOGY | 2024年 / 24卷 / 01期
关键词
Erector spinae plane block; Arthroscopic shoulder surgery; Pain; Postoperative analgesia; PLANE BLOCK; POSTOPERATIVE ANALGESIA; PAIN; MANAGEMENT; RECOVERY;
D O I
10.1186/s12871-024-02586-7
中图分类号
R614 [麻醉学];
学科分类号
100217 ;
摘要
Background Erector spinae plane block (ESPB) is a novel fascial plane block technique that can provide effective perioperative analgesia for thoracic, abdominal and lumbar surgeries. However, the effect of cervical ESPB on postoperative analgesia after arthroscopic shoulder surgery is unknown. The aim of this study is to investigate the analgesic effect and safety of ultrasound-guided cervical ESPB in arthroscopic shoulder surgery. Methods Seventy patients undergoing arthroscopy shoulder surgery were randomly assigned to one of two groups: ESPB group (n = 35) or control group (n = 35). Patients in the ESPB group received an ultrasound-guided ESPB at the C7 level with 30 mL of 0.25% ropivacaine 30 min before induction of general anesthesia, whereas patients in the control group received no block. The primary outcome measures were the static visual analogue scale (VAS) pain scores at 4, 12, and 24 h after surgery. Secondary outcomes included heart rate (HR) and mean arterial pressure (MAP) before anesthesia (t1), 5 min after anesthesia (t2), 10 min after skin incision (t3), and 10 min after extubation (t4); intraoperative remifentanil consumption; the Bruggrmann comfort scale (BCS) score, quality of recovery-15 (QoR-15) scale score and the number of patients who required rescue analgesia 24 h after surgery; and adverse events. Results The static VAS scores at 4, 12 and 24 h after surgery were significantly lower in the ESPB group than those in the control group (2.17 +/- 0.71 vs. 3.14 +/- 1.19, 1.77 +/- 0.77 vs. 2.63 +/- 0.84, 0.74 +/- 0.66 vs. 1.14 +/- 0.88, all P < 0.05). There were no significant differences in HR or MAP at any time point during the perioperative period between the two groups (all P > 0.05). The intraoperative consumption of remifentanil was significantly less in the ESPB group compared to the control group (P < 0.05). The scores of BCS and QoR-15 scale were higher in the ESPB group 24 h after surgery than those in the control group (P < 0.05). Compared to the control group, fewer patients in the ESPB group required rescue analgesia 24 h after surgery (P < 0.05). No serious complications occurred in either group. Conclusions Ultrasound-guided cervical ESPB can provide effective postoperative analgesia following arthroscopic shoulder surgery, resulting in a better postoperative recovery with fewer complications. Trial registration Chictr.org.cn identifier ChiCTR2300070731 (Date of registry: 21/04/2023, prospectively registered).
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Clinical experiences of ultrasound-guided erector spinae plane block for thoracic vertebra surgery reply
    Arevalo-Ludena, Julian
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ANESTHESIA, 2017, 38 : 138 - 139
  • [42] Ultrasound-guided erector spinae plane block in posterior lumbar surgery (Review)
    Deng, Ke
    Huang, Kui
    Wu, Guo-Feng
    BIOMEDICAL REPORTS, 2024, 20 (06)
  • [43] Extraplexus versus intraplexus ultrasound-guided interscalene brachial plexus block for ambulatory arthroscopic shoulder surgery: A randomized controlled trial
    Harbell, Monica W.
    Kolodzie, Kerstin
    Behrends, Matthias
    Benjamin Ma, C.
    Kinjo, Sakura
    Yap, Edward
    Braehler, Matthias R.
    Aleshi, Pedram
    PLOS ONE, 2021, 16 (02):
  • [44] Does Erector Spinae Plane Block Have a Visceral Analgesic Effect?: A Randomized Controlled Trial
    Hye-Mee Kwon
    Doo-Hwan Kim
    Sung-Moon Jeong
    Kyu Taek Choi
    Sooin Park
    Hyun-Jung Kwon
    Jong-Hyuk Lee
    Scientific Reports, 10
  • [45] Does Erector Spinae Plane Block Have a Visceral Analgesic Effect?: A Randomized Controlled Trial
    Kwon, Hye-Mee
    Kim, Doo-Hwan
    Jeong, Sung-Moon
    Choi, Kyu Taek
    Park, Sooin
    Kwon, Hyun-Jung
    Lee, Jong-Hyuk
    SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2020, 10 (01)
  • [46] Comments on "Regional Analgesia for Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy Using Ultrasound-guided Quadratus Lumborum Block or Erector Spinae Block: A Randomized Controlled Trial"
    Guan, Xiaoqin
    PAIN PHYSICIAN, 2023, 26 (03) : E409 - E410
  • [47] Application of erector spinae plane block guided by ultrasound for postoperative analgesia in breast cancer surgery: A randomized controlled trial
    He, Wensheng
    Wu, Zhenyu
    Zu, Lingjie
    Sun, Haijun
    Yang, Xiaochun
    CANCER COMMUNICATIONS, 2020, 40 (2-3) : 122 - 125
  • [48] Analgesic effect of erector spinae plane block after cesarean section: A randomized controlled trial
    Dostbil, A.
    Ince, I.
    Altinpulluk, E. Y.
    Perez, M. F.
    Peksoz, U.
    Cimilli, G.
    Kasali, K.
    Atalay, C.
    Ozmen, O.
    Sahin, T.
    Yilmaz, E.
    NIGERIAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PRACTICE, 2023, 26 (02) : 153 - 161
  • [49] The analgesic effect of bilateral ultrasound-guided erector spinae plane block in paediatric lower abdominal surgeries: A randomised, prospective trial
    Singh, Swati
    Jha, Raushan Kumar
    Sharma, Manisha
    INDIAN JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA, 2020, 64 (09) : 762 - 767
  • [50] Ultrasound Guided Erector Spinae Block for Thoracic Surgery
    Mahmood, Feroze
    Matyal, Robina
    Chaudhary, Omar
    Fatima, Huma
    Baribeau, Yanick
    Zhang, Qianqian
    Sharkey, Aidan
    ANESTHESIA AND ANALGESIA, 2020, 130 : 13 - 13