Diagnosing drivers of PM2.5 simulation biases in China from meteorology, chemical composition, and emission sources using an efficient machine learning method

被引:1
|
作者
Wang, Shuai [1 ]
Zhang, Mengyuan [1 ]
Gao, Yueqi [1 ]
Wang, Peng [2 ,3 ]
Fu, Qingyan [4 ]
Zhang, Hongliang [1 ,3 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Fudan Univ, Dept Environm Sci & Engn, Shanghai 200438, Peoples R China
[2] Fudan Univ, Inst Atmospher Sci, Dept Atmospher & Ocean Sci, Shanghai 200438, Peoples R China
[3] Fudan Univ, IRDR ICoE Risk Interconnect & Governance Weather, Climate Extremes Impact & Publ Hlth, Shanghai, Peoples R China
[4] Shanghai Environm Monitoring Ctr, Shanghai 200235, Peoples R China
[5] Inst Ecochongming IEC, Shanghai 200062, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
SECONDARY ORGANIC AEROSOL; YANGTZE-RIVER DELTA; PARTICULATE MATTER; SURFACE OZONE; SOURCE APPORTIONMENT; POLLUTION; AIR; NITRATE; MODEL; VARIABILITY;
D O I
10.5194/gmd-17-3617-2024
中图分类号
P [天文学、地球科学];
学科分类号
07 ;
摘要
Chemical transport models (CTMs) are widely used for air pollution modeling, which suffer from significant biases due to uncertainties in simplified parameterization, meteorological fields, and emission inventories. Accurate diagnosis of simulation biases is critical for improvement of models, interpretation of results, and efficient air quality management, especially for the simulation of fine particulate matter (PM2.5). In this study, an efficient method based on machine learning (ML) was designed to diagnose the drivers of the Community Multiscale Air Quality (CMAQ) model biases in simulating PM2.5 concentrations from three perspectives of meteorology, chemical composition, and emission sources. The source-oriented CMAQ were used to diagnose influences of different emission sources on PM2.5 biases. The ML models showed good fitting ability with small performance gap between training and validation. The CMAQ model underestimates PM2.5 by -19.25 to -2.66 mu g/m(3) in 2019, especially in winter and spring and high PM2.5 events. Secondary organic components showed the largest contribution to PM2.5 simulation bias for different regions and seasons (13.8-22.6 %) among components. Relative humidity, cloud cover, and soil surface moisture were the main meteorological factors contributing to PM2.5 bias in the North China Plain, Pearl River Delta, and northwestern, respectively. Both primary and secondary inorganic components from residential sources showed the largest contribution (12.05 % and 12.78 %), implying large uncertainties in this sector. The ML-based methods provide valuable complements to traditional mechanism-based methods for model improvement, with high efficiency and low reliance on prior information.
引用
收藏
页码:3617 / 3629
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] A Development of PM2.5 Forecasting System in South Korea Using Chemical Transport Modeling and Machine Learning
    Youn-Seo Koo
    Hee-Yong Kwon
    Hyosik Bae
    Hui-Young Yun
    Dae-Ryun Choi
    SukHyun Yu
    Kyung-Hui Wang
    Ji-Seok Koo
    Jae-Bum Lee
    Min-Hyeok Choi
    Jeong-Beom Lee
    Asia-Pacific Journal of Atmospheric Sciences, 2023, 59 : 577 - 595
  • [32] Enhancing the Applicability of Satellite Remote Sensing for PM2.5 Estimation Using Machine Learning Models in China
    Chai, Jun
    Song, Jun
    Xu, Yawen
    Zhang, Le
    Guo, Bing
    JOURNAL OF SENSORS, 2022, 2022
  • [33] Chemical nature and predominant sources of PM10 and PM2.5 from multiple sites on the Silk Road, Northwest China
    Zhou, Xi
    Li, Zhongqin
    Zhang, Tinjun
    Wang, Feiteng
    Tao, Yan
    Zhang, Xin
    Wang, Fanglong
    Huang, Ju
    Cheng, Taotao
    Jiang, Huimin
    Zheng, Cunying
    Liu, Feng
    ATMOSPHERIC POLLUTION RESEARCH, 2021, 12 (01) : 425 - 436
  • [34] High-resolution Simulation Dataset of Hourly PM2.5 Chemical Composition in China (CAQRA-aerosol) from 2013 to 2020
    Kong, Lei
    Tang, Xiao
    Zhu, Jiang
    Wang, Zifa
    Liu, Bing
    Zhu, Yuanyuan
    Zhu, Lili
    Chen, Duohong
    Hu, Ke
    Wu, Huangjian
    Wu, Qian
    Shen, Jin
    Sun, Yele
    Liu, Zirui
    Xin, Jinyuan
    Ji, Dongsheng
    Zheng, Mei
    ADVANCES IN ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES, 2025, 42 (04) : 697 - 712
  • [35] Drivers of 2015-2021 trends in cold winter surface PM2.5 in the Harbin-Changchun megalopolis in China: Meteorology vs. anthropogenic emission
    Li, Bo
    Lu, Lu
    Shi, Xiaofei
    Ma, Lixin
    Jiang, Jin-Pan
    Yabo, Stephen Dauda
    Wang, Kun
    Qi, Hong
    ATMOSPHERIC RESEARCH, 2023, 285
  • [36] Continuous estimations of daily PM2.5 chemical components from temporally sparse monitoring data using a machine learning approach
    Araki, Shin
    Shimadera, Hikari
    Shima, Masayuki
    ATMOSPHERIC POLLUTION RESEARCH, 2022, 13 (11)
  • [37] Chemical composition, multiple sources, and health risks of PM2.5: A case study in Linyi, China's plate and logistics capital
    Liu, Sai
    Wang, Gang
    Kong, Fanhua
    Huang, Ziwei
    Zhao, Na
    Gao, Wenkang
    ENVIRONMENTAL POLLUTION, 2025, 365
  • [38] Field characterization of the PM2.5 Aerosol Chemical Speciation Monitor: insights into the composition, sources, and processes of fine particles in eastern China
    Zhang, Yunjiang
    Tang, Lili
    Croteau, Philip L.
    Favez, Olivier
    Sun, Yele
    Canagaratna, Manjula R.
    Wang, Zhuang
    Couvidat, Florian
    Albinet, Alexandre
    Zhang, Hongliang
    Sciare, Jean
    Prevot, Andre S. H.
    Jayne, John T.
    Worsnop, Douglas R.
    ATMOSPHERIC CHEMISTRY AND PHYSICS, 2017, 17 (23) : 14501 - 14517
  • [39] Detection of critical PM2.5 emission sources and their contributions to a heavy haze episode in Beijing, China, using an adjoint model
    Zhai, Shixian
    An, Xingqin
    Zhao, Tianliang
    Sun, Zhaobin
    Wang, Wei
    Hou, Qing
    Guo, Zengyuan
    Wang, Chao
    ATMOSPHERIC CHEMISTRY AND PHYSICS, 2018, 18 (09) : 6241 - 6258
  • [40] Effects of significant emission changes on PM2.5 chemical composition and optical properties from 2019 to 2021 in a typical industrial city of eastern China
    Huang, Xiangpeng
    Li, Changping
    Pan, Chao
    Li, Yue'e
    Zheng, Wei
    Lin, Guangwu
    Li, Haiwei
    Zhang, Yunjiang
    Wang, Junfeng
    Lei, Yali
    Ye, Jianhuai
    Ge, Xinlei
    Zhang, Hongliang
    ATMOSPHERIC RESEARCH, 2024, 301