Diagnosing drivers of PM2.5 simulation biases in China from meteorology, chemical composition, and emission sources using an efficient machine learning method

被引:1
|
作者
Wang, Shuai [1 ]
Zhang, Mengyuan [1 ]
Gao, Yueqi [1 ]
Wang, Peng [2 ,3 ]
Fu, Qingyan [4 ]
Zhang, Hongliang [1 ,3 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Fudan Univ, Dept Environm Sci & Engn, Shanghai 200438, Peoples R China
[2] Fudan Univ, Inst Atmospher Sci, Dept Atmospher & Ocean Sci, Shanghai 200438, Peoples R China
[3] Fudan Univ, IRDR ICoE Risk Interconnect & Governance Weather, Climate Extremes Impact & Publ Hlth, Shanghai, Peoples R China
[4] Shanghai Environm Monitoring Ctr, Shanghai 200235, Peoples R China
[5] Inst Ecochongming IEC, Shanghai 200062, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
SECONDARY ORGANIC AEROSOL; YANGTZE-RIVER DELTA; PARTICULATE MATTER; SURFACE OZONE; SOURCE APPORTIONMENT; POLLUTION; AIR; NITRATE; MODEL; VARIABILITY;
D O I
10.5194/gmd-17-3617-2024
中图分类号
P [天文学、地球科学];
学科分类号
07 ;
摘要
Chemical transport models (CTMs) are widely used for air pollution modeling, which suffer from significant biases due to uncertainties in simplified parameterization, meteorological fields, and emission inventories. Accurate diagnosis of simulation biases is critical for improvement of models, interpretation of results, and efficient air quality management, especially for the simulation of fine particulate matter (PM2.5). In this study, an efficient method based on machine learning (ML) was designed to diagnose the drivers of the Community Multiscale Air Quality (CMAQ) model biases in simulating PM2.5 concentrations from three perspectives of meteorology, chemical composition, and emission sources. The source-oriented CMAQ were used to diagnose influences of different emission sources on PM2.5 biases. The ML models showed good fitting ability with small performance gap between training and validation. The CMAQ model underestimates PM2.5 by -19.25 to -2.66 mu g/m(3) in 2019, especially in winter and spring and high PM2.5 events. Secondary organic components showed the largest contribution to PM2.5 simulation bias for different regions and seasons (13.8-22.6 %) among components. Relative humidity, cloud cover, and soil surface moisture were the main meteorological factors contributing to PM2.5 bias in the North China Plain, Pearl River Delta, and northwestern, respectively. Both primary and secondary inorganic components from residential sources showed the largest contribution (12.05 % and 12.78 %), implying large uncertainties in this sector. The ML-based methods provide valuable complements to traditional mechanism-based methods for model improvement, with high efficiency and low reliance on prior information.
引用
收藏
页码:3617 / 3629
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Chemical Composition and Sources of PM10 and PM2.5 Aerosols in Guangzhou, China
    Xinhua Wang
    Xinhui Bi
    Guoying Sheng
    Jiamo Fu
    Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 2006, 119 : 425 - 439
  • [2] Chemical composition and sources of PM10 and PM2.5 aerosols in Guangzhou, China
    Wang, Xinhua
    Bi, Xinhui
    Sheng, Guoying
    Fu, Jiamo
    ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING AND ASSESSMENT, 2006, 119 (1-3) : 425 - 439
  • [3] Chemical composition and sources of amines in PM2.5 in an urban site of PRD, China
    Huang, Shan
    Song, Qicong
    Hu, Weiwei
    Yuan, Bin
    Liu, Junwen
    Jiang, Bin
    Li, Wei
    Wu, Caihong
    Jiang, Fan
    Chen, Wei
    Wang, Xinming
    Shao, Min
    ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH, 2022, 212
  • [4] PM2.5 from the Guanzhong Plain: Chemical composition and implications for emission reductions
    Niu, Xinyi
    Cao, Junji
    Shen, Zhenxing
    Ho, Steven Sai Hang
    Tie, Xuexi
    Zhao, Shuyu
    Xu, Hongmei
    Zhang, Bting
    Huang, Rujin
    ATMOSPHERIC ENVIRONMENT, 2016, 147 : 458 - 469
  • [5] Using Machine Learning Approach to Evaluate the PM2.5 Concentrations in China from 1998 to 2016
    Lin, Li
    Di, Liping
    Yang, Ruixin
    Zhang, Chen
    Yu, Eugene
    Rahman, Md. Shahinoor
    Sun, Ziheng
    Tang, Junmei
    2018 7TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON AGRO-GEOINFORMATICS (AGRO-GEOINFORMATICS), 2018, : 202 - 206
  • [6] Chemical composition, diurnal variation and sources of PM2.5 at two industrial sites of South China
    Huang, Bo
    Liu, Ming
    Ren, Zhaofang
    Bi, Xinhui
    Zhang, Guohua
    Sheng, Guoying
    Fu, Jiamo
    ATMOSPHERIC POLLUTION RESEARCH, 2013, 4 (03) : 298 - 305
  • [7] Machine learning exploring the chemical compositions characteristics and sources of PM2.5 from reduced on-road activity
    Liao, Dan
    Hong, Youwei
    Huang, Huabin
    Choi, Sung-Deuk
    Zhuang, Zhixia
    ATMOSPHERIC POLLUTION RESEARCH, 2024, 15 (11)
  • [8] Spatiotemporal variations of PM2.5 and ozone in urban agglomerations of China and meteorological drivers for ozone using explainable machine learning
    Lyu, Yan
    Xu, Haonan
    Wu, Haonan
    Han, Fuliang
    Lv, Fengmao
    Kang, Azhen
    Pang, Xiaobing
    ENVIRONMENTAL POLLUTION, 2025, 365
  • [9] Evaluating drivers of PM2.5 air pollution at urban scales using interpretable machine learning
    Hou, Yali
    Wang, Qunwei
    Tan, Tao
    WASTE MANAGEMENT, 2025, 192 : 114 - 124
  • [10] Application of machine learning algorithms to improve numerical simulation prediction of PM2.5 and chemical components
    Lv, Lingling
    Wei, Peng
    Li, Juan
    Hu, Jingnan
    ATMOSPHERIC POLLUTION RESEARCH, 2021, 12 (11)