The Effect of Supplementary Staple Fixation on Biomechanical Properties of Soft Tissue Graft Tibial Fixation in Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction

被引:0
|
作者
Yildirim, Cem [1 ]
Demirel, Mehmet [2 ]
Koraman, Emre [3 ,6 ]
Muratoglu, Osman Gorkem
Yamak, Fatih
Bozdag, Sureyya Ergun [4 ]
Kocabey, Yavuz [5 ]
机构
[1] Basaksehir Cam & Sakura City Hosp, Dept Orthoped & Traumatol, Istanbul, Turkiye
[2] Istanbul Univ, Istanbul Fac Med, Dept Orthoped & Traumatol, Istanbul, Turkiye
[3] Demiroglu Bilim Univ, Kadikoy Florence Nightingale Hosp, Sch Med, Dept Orthopaed & Traumatol, Istanbul, Turkiye
[4] Istanbul Tech Univ, Fac Mech Engn, Istanbul, Turkiye
[5] Medivia Hosp, Dept Orthoped & Traumatol, Istanbul, Turkiye
[6] Demiroglu Bilim Univ, Kadikoy Florence Nightingale Hosp, Sch Med, Dept Orthoped & Traumatol, Feneryolumah Bagdat cad 63 Kiziltoprak-Kadikoy, TR-34724 Istanbul, Turkiye
关键词
anterior cruciate ligament; tibial fixation; soft tissue graft; tendon graft; supplementary staple fixation; INTERFERENCE SCREW FIXATION; TENDON GRAFT;
D O I
10.1055/s-0044-1786007
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
This study aimed to test and compare the biomechanical properties of three tibial fixation methods of anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) tendon grafts under cyclic load and load-to-failure testing in the bovine proximal tibiae, comprising (1) staple fixation alone, (2) interference screw fixation alone, and (3) interference screw fixation with a supplementary staple. Twenty-four bovine tibiae used in the study were divided into three groups (eight proximal tibiae in each group) based on tibial fixation methods of ACL tendon grafts: group A (a spiked ligament staple alone), group B (a cannulated interference screw alone), and group C (a cannulated interference screw with a supplementary staple). Each graft fixation was exposed to cyclic loading conditions. Significant differences were determined in failure load among the three groups (p = 0.008). The mean failure load was significantly higher in group B (717.04 +/- 218.51 N) than in group A (308.03 +/- 17.22 N) (p = 0.006). No significant differences were observed among the groups regarding axial stiffness (p = 0.442). Cyclic displacement differed significantly among the three groups (p = 0.005). In pairwise comparisons, the mean cyclic displacement was significantly higher in group A (8.22 +/- 3.24 mm) compared with group C (1.49 +/- 0.41 mm) (p = 0.005). Failure displacement varied considerably among the groups (p = 0.037). Although group B (15.53 +/- 6.43 mm) exhibited a greater mean failure displacement than both group A (4.9 +/- 0.75 mm) and group C (8.84 +/- 4.65 mm), these differences did not reach statistical significance (p = 0.602 and p = 0.329, respectively). Interference screw fixation alone and supplementary staple fixation have biomechanically similar characteristics in terms of initial strength and stiffness of tibial ACL soft tissue graft fixation. Regardless of staple use, an interference screw with the same diameter as the tibial tunnel can ensure sufficient tensile strength in tibial ACL graft fixation.
引用
收藏
页码:736 / 741
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [11] Fixation of the graft in reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament
    Harvey, A
    Thomas, NP
    Amis, AA
    JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-BRITISH VOLUME, 2005, 87B (05): : 593 - 603
  • [12] Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: graft fixation
    Wagner, M.
    Scheffler, S. U.
    Weiler, A.
    ARTHROSKOPIE, 2005, 18 (01) : 27 - 35
  • [13] Can an expansion device be used in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction? An in vitro study of soft tissue graft tibial fixation
    Martel, Oscar
    Garces, Gerardo L.
    Yanez, Alejandro
    Cuadrado, Alberto
    Cardenes, Juan F.
    KNEE, 2016, 23 (06): : 1049 - 1054
  • [14] Tibial Fixation for Hamstring Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction
    Paulos, Lonnie E.
    Stewart, Andrew M.
    TECHNIQUES IN ORTHOPAEDICS, 2005, 20 (03) : 303 - 305
  • [15] Supplemental tibial fixation for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction
    Eisen, Sarah H.
    Davidson, Philip A.
    Rivenburgh, Dennis W.
    ARTHROSCOPY-THE JOURNAL OF ARTHROSCOPIC AND RELATED SURGERY, 2008, 24 (09): : 1078 - 1080
  • [16] Mechanical properties of soft tissue femoral fixation devices for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction
    Ahmad, CS
    Gardner, TR
    Groh, M
    Arnouk, J
    Levine, WN
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SPORTS MEDICINE, 2004, 32 (03): : 635 - 640
  • [17] Structural properties of six tibial fixation methods for anterior cruciate ligament soft tissue grafts
    Magen, HE
    Howell, SM
    Hull, ML
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SPORTS MEDICINE, 1999, 27 (01): : 35 - 43
  • [18] A biomechanical comparison of initial fixation strength of 3 different methods of anterior cruciate ligament soft tissue graft tibial fixation - Resistance to monotonic and cyclic loading
    Bartz, Reed L.
    Mossoni, Kory
    Tyber, Jeffrey
    Tokish, John
    Gall, Kenneth
    Siparsky, Patrick N.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SPORTS MEDICINE, 2007, 35 (06): : 949 - 954
  • [19] Graft fixation alternatives in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction
    Saccomanni B.
    MUSCULOSKELETAL SURGERY, 2011, 95 (3) : 183 - 191
  • [20] Triple Hybrid Tibial Anterior Cruciate Ligament Graft Fixation
    Runer, Armin
    Hax, Jakob
    Gelber, Pablo
    Stadelmann, Vincent A.
    Preiss, Stefan
    Salzmann, Gian
    ARTHROSCOPY TECHNIQUES, 2023, 12 (12): : e2375 - e2379