Quantitative Time-of-Flight Head Magnetic Resonance Angiography of Cerebrovascular Disease

被引:4
|
作者
Koktzoglou, Ioannis [1 ,2 ,7 ]
Ozturk, Onural [1 ,3 ]
Walker, Matthew T. [1 ,2 ]
Ankenbrandt, William J. [1 ,2 ]
Ong, Archie L. [2 ,4 ,6 ]
Ares, William J. [2 ,5 ]
Gil, Fulvio R. [2 ,4 ]
Bulwa, Zachary B. [2 ,4 ]
Edelman, Robert R. [1 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Endeavor Hlth, Dept Radiol, Evanston, IL USA
[2] Univ Chicago, Pritzker Sch Med, Chicago, IL USA
[3] Northwestern Univ, Feinberg Sch Med, Chicago, IL USA
[4] Endeavor Hlth, Dept Neurol, Evanston, IL USA
[5] Endeavor Hlth, Dept Neurosurg, Evanston, IL USA
[6] Northwestern Lake Forest Hosp, Dept Neurol, Lake Forest, IL USA
[7] Walgreen Jr Bldg,G507,2650 Ridge Ave, Evanston, IL 60201 USA
关键词
head; MRA; quantitative TOF; time-of-flight; phase contrast; cerebrovascular disease; INTRACRANIAL VASCULAR STENOSIS; CEREBRAL-BLOOD-FLOW; MR-ANGIOGRAPHY; STROKE RISK; MALFORMATIONS; HEMODYNAMICS; SENSITIVITY; OCCLUSION; ANEURYSMS; ARTERIES;
D O I
10.1002/jmri.29395
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Background: Standard Cartesian time-of-flight (TOF) head magnetic resonance angiography (MRA) is routinely used to evaluate the intracranial arteries, but does not provide quantitative hemodynamic information that is useful for patient risk stratification as well as for monitoring treatment and tracking changes in blood flow over time. Quantitative TOF (qTOF) MRA represents a new and efficient method for simultaneous evaluating the intracranial arteries and quantifying blood flow velocity, but it has not yet been evaluated in patients with cerebrovascular disease. Purpose: To evaluate qTOF for simultaneously evaluating the intracranial arteries and quantifying intracranial blood flow velocity in patients with cerebrovascular disease, without the need for a phase contrast (PC) scan. Study Type: Prospective. Subjects: Twenty-four patients (18 female, 6 male) with cerebrovascular disease. Field Strength/Sequences: Head MRA at 3 T using gradient-echo 3D qTOF, standard Cartesian TOF, and PC protocols. Assessment: Three independent readers assessed arterial image quality using a 4-point scale (1: non-diagnostic, 4: excellent) and artifact presence. Total and component flow velocities obtained with qTOF and PC were measured. Statistical Tests: Wilcoxon signed-rank tests, Gwet's AC2, intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC) for absolute agreement, Bland-Altman analyses, tests of equal proportions. P values <0.05 were considered statistically significant. Results: Averaged across readers and compared to standard Cartesian TOF, qTOF significantly improved overall arterial image quality (3.8 +/- 0.2 vs. 3.6 +/- 0.5), image quality at locations of pathology (3.7 +/- 0.5 vs. 3.4 +/- 0.7), and increased the proportion of evaluations rated without artifacts (63.9% [46/72] vs. 37.5% [27/72]). qTOF significantly agreed with PC for total flow velocity (ICC = 0.71) and component flow velocity (ICC = 0.89). Data Conclusion: qTOF angiography of the head matched or improved upon the image quality of standard Cartesian TOF, reduced image artifacts, and provided quantitative hemodynamic data, without the need for a PC scan.
引用
收藏
页码:404 / 412
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Time-of-flight magnetic resonance angiography of aorta and renal arteries: State-of-the-art
    Laissy, JP
    SchoumanClaeys, E
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 1996, 21 (03) : 201 - 211
  • [32] Improving Cerebrovascular Imaging with Deep Learning: Semantic Segmentation for Time-of-Flight Magnetic Resonance Angiography Maximum Intensity Projection Image Enhancement
    Yamada, Tomonari
    Yoshimura, Takaaki
    Ichikawa, Shota
    Sugimori, Hiroyuki
    APPLIED SCIENCES-BASEL, 2025, 15 (06):
  • [33] BV-GAN: 3D time-of-flight magnetic resonance angiography cerebrovascular vessel segmentation using adversarial CNNs
    Amran, Dor
    Artzi, Moran
    Aizenstein, Orna
    Ben Bashat, Dafna
    Bermano, Amit H.
    JOURNAL OF MEDICAL IMAGING, 2022, 9 (04)
  • [34] Contrast-enhanced Magnetic Resonance Angiography in Stroke DiagnosticsAdditional Information Compared with Time-of-Flight Magnetic Resonance Angiography?Kontrastmittelverstärkte Magnetresonanzangiographie in der SchlaganfalldiagnostikInformationsgewinn gegenüber der „Time-of-flight“-Magnetresonanzangiographie?
    K. Alfke
    U. Jensen
    C. Pool
    A. Rohr
    R. Brüning
    J. Weber
    T. Bartsch
    R. Stingele
    O. Jansen
    Clinical Neuroradiology, 2011, 21 (1) : 5 - 10
  • [35] Follow-up of coiled cerebral aneurysms: Comparison of three-dimensional time-of-flight magnetic resonance angiography at 3 tesla with three-dimensional time-of-flight magnetic resonance angiography and contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography at 1.5 tesla
    Anzalone, Nicoletta
    Scomazzoni, Francesco
    Cirillo, Mario
    Cadioli, Marcello
    Iadanza, Antonella
    Kirchin, Miles A.
    Scotti, Giuseppe
    INVESTIGATIVE RADIOLOGY, 2008, 43 (08) : 559 - 567
  • [36] Magnetic resonance angiography findings in ischemic cerebrovascular disease
    Guzel, V.
    Yayla, V.
    Culha, A.
    Selcuk, O.
    Cabalar, M.
    Guveli, B.
    Selcuk, H.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF NEUROLOGY, 2012, 19 : 517 - 517
  • [37] The Pathophysiology of Watershed Infarction: A Three-Dimensional Time-of-Flight Magnetic Resonance Angiography Study
    Weill, Caroline
    Suissa, Laurent
    Darcourt, Jacques
    Mahagne, Marie-Helene
    JOURNAL OF STROKE & CEREBROVASCULAR DISEASES, 2017, 26 (09): : 1966 - 1973
  • [38] EVALUATION OF CEREBRAL VASOREACTIVITY BY 3-DIMENSIONAL TIME-OF-FLIGHT MAGNETIC-RESONANCE ANGIOGRAPHY
    MANDAI, K
    SUEYOSHI, K
    FUKUNAGA, R
    NUKADA, M
    TSUKAGUCHI, I
    MATSUMOTO, M
    KAMADA, T
    STROKE, 1994, 25 (09) : 1807 - 1811
  • [39] 3-DIMENSIONAL TIME-OF-FLIGHT MAGNETIC-RESONANCE ANGIOGRAPHY USING SPIN SATURATION
    DUMOULIN, CL
    CLINE, HE
    SOUZA, SP
    WAGLE, WA
    WALKER, MF
    MAGNETIC RESONANCE IN MEDICINE, 1989, 11 (01) : 35 - 46
  • [40] Absence of flow in ovarian vein by time-of-flight magnetic resonance angiography without evidence of thrombosis
    Rizk, B
    Georgy, B
    Snow, R
    Lynn, S
    Thorneycroft, IH
    CLINICAL IMAGING, 1997, 21 (03) : 203 - 206