Post-intensive care syndrome screening: a French multicentre survey

被引:1
|
作者
Agbakou, Maite [1 ]
Combet, Margot [2 ]
Martin, Maelle [1 ]
Blonz, Gauthier [1 ]
Desmedt, Luc [1 ]
Seguin, Amelie [1 ]
Lemarie, Jeremie [1 ]
Zambon, Olivier [1 ]
Reignier, Jean [3 ]
Lascarrou, Jean-Baptiste [1 ]
Ehrmann, Stephan [4 ,5 ,6 ,7 ]
Canet, Emmanuel [1 ]
机构
[1] Nantes Univ, Nantes Univ Hosp, Intens Care Unit, 30 Bd Jean Monnet, F-44093 Nantes 1, France
[2] Kremlin Bicetre Univ Hosp, AP HP, Intens Care Unit, Le Kremlin Bicetre, France
[3] Nantes Univ Hosp, Intens Care Unit, Movement Interact Performance Res Unit MIP, MIP,UR 4334, Nantes, France
[4] Tours Univ Hosp, Intens Care Unit, Tours, France
[5] Tours Univ, Tours Univ Hosp, INSERM CIC 1415, Tours, France
[6] Tours Univ, Res Ctr Resp Dis, INSERM, U1100, Tours, France
[7] Clin Res Intens Care & Sepsis Trial Grp Global Eva, Tours, France
来源
ANNALS OF INTENSIVE CARE | 2024年 / 14卷 / 01期
关键词
Intensive care unit; Survey; France; Post-intensive care syndrome; Disability; Screening; RESPIRATORY-DISTRESS-SYNDROME; TERM COGNITIVE IMPAIRMENT; FUNCTIONAL DISABILITY; CRITICAL ILLNESS; SURVIVORS; MORTALITY; OUTCOMES; UNIT; DYSFUNCTION; DISCHARGE;
D O I
10.1186/s13613-024-01341-y
中图分类号
R4 [临床医学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100602 ;
摘要
BackgroundPost-intensive care syndrome (PICS), defined as physical, cognitive, and mental-health symptoms persisting long after intensive-care-unit (ICU) discharge, is increasingly recognised as a healthcare priority. Data on screening for PICS are sparse. Our objective here was to describe post-ICU screening in France, with special attention to visit availability and evaluations done during visits.MethodsWe conducted an online multicentre survey by emailing an anonymous 43-item questionnaire to French ICUs. For each ICU, a single survey was sent to either the head or the intensivist in charge of follow-up visits.ResultsOf 252 ICUs invited to participate, 161 (63.9%) returned the completed survey. Among them, 46 (28.6%) offered follow-up visits. Usually, a single visit led by an intensivist was scheduled 3 to 6 months after ICU discharge. Approximately 50 patients/year/ICU, that is, about 5% of admitted patients, attended post-ICU visits. The main criteria used to select patients for follow-up were ICU stay and/or invasive mechanical ventilation duration longer than 48 h, cardiac arrest, septic shock, and acute respiratory distress syndrome. Among ICUs offering visits, 80% used validated instruments to screen for PICS. Of the 115 ICUs not offering follow-up, 50 (43.5%) indicated an intention to start follow-up within the next year. The main barriers to offering follow-up were lack of available staff and equipment or not viewing PICS screening as a priority. Half the ICUs offering visits worked with an established network of post-ICU care professionals, and another 17% were setting up such a network. Obstacles to network creation were lack of interest among healthcare professionals and lack of specific training in PICS.ConclusionOnly a small minority of ICU survivors received follow-up designed to detect PICS. Less than a third of ICUs offered follow-up visits but nearly another third planned to set up such visits within the next year. Recommendations issued by French health authorities in 2023 can be expected to improve the availability and standardisation of post-ICU follow-up.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Intensive Care Nutrition and Post-Intensive Care Recovery
    Gunst, Jan
    Van den Berghe, Greet
    CRITICAL CARE CLINICS, 2018, 34 (04) : 573 - +
  • [42] Minimizing Post-Intensive Care Syndrome to Improve Outcomes for Intensive Care Unit Survivors
    Mulkey, Malissa A.
    Beacham, Pamela
    McCormick, Megan A.
    Everhart, D. Erik
    Khan, Babar
    CRITICAL CARE NURSE, 2022, 42 (04) : 68 - 73
  • [43] The risk of post-intensive care syndrome among patients hospitalised in the intensive care unit
    Bialek, Katarzyna
    MEDICAL STUDIES-STUDIA MEDYCZNE, 2021, 37 (01) : 70 - 76
  • [44] The Effect of Damage Control Surgery in Post-intensive Care Syndrome
    Lee, J.
    Bottom-Tanzer, S.
    Bawazeer, M.
    Bugaev, N.
    Hojman, H.
    Johnson, B.
    Velez, M.
    Kim, W.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF RESPIRATORY AND CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 2024, 209
  • [45] Post-intensive care syndrome: Time for a robust outcome measure?
    Yuan, Chu
    Timmins, Fiona
    Thompson, David R.
    NURSING IN CRITICAL CARE, 2022, 27 (01) : 8 - 9
  • [46] Validation of a New Diagnostic Tool for Post-Intensive Care Syndrome
    Wang, S.
    Allen, D.
    Perkins, A.
    Monahan, P.
    Khan, S. H.
    Lasiter, S.
    Boustani, M.
    Khan, B. A.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF RESPIRATORY AND CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 2018, 197
  • [47] Validation into Spanish of a Scale to Detect the Post-intensive Care Syndrome
    Narvaez Martinez, Mario Andres
    Henao Castano, Angela Maria
    INVESTIGACION Y EDUCACION EN ENFERMERIA, 2023, 41 (01):
  • [48] A Decade of Post-Intensive Care Syndrome: A Bibliometric Network Analysis
    Paul, Nicolas
    Albrecht, Valentina
    Denke, Claudia
    Spies, Claudia D.
    Krampe, Henning
    Weiss, Bjoern
    MEDICINA-LITHUANIA, 2022, 58 (02):
  • [49] Guideline on multimodal rehabilitation for patients with post-intensive care syndrome
    Caroline Renner
    Marie-Madlen Jeitziner
    Monika Albert
    Sabine Brinkmann
    Karin Diserens
    Imanuel Dzialowski
    Maria-Dorothea Heidler
    Martina Lück
    Ricki Nusser-Müller-Busch
    Peter S. Sandor
    Andreas Schäfer
    Bettina Scheffler
    Claus Wallesch
    Gudrun Zimmermann
    Peter Nydahl
    Critical Care, 27
  • [50] Pediatric Post-Intensive Care Syndrome and Current Therapeutic Options
    Williams, Cydni N.
    Pinto, Neethi P.
    Colville, Gillian A.
    CRITICAL CARE CLINICS, 2025, 41 (01) : 53 - 71