Early pathophysiology-driven airway pressure release ventilation versus low tidal volume ventilation strategy for patients with moderate-severe ARDS: study protocol for a randomized, multicenter, controlled trial

被引:1
|
作者
Zhou, Yongfang [1 ]
Cheng, Jiangli [1 ]
Zhu, Shuo [1 ]
Dong, Meiling [1 ]
Lv, Yinxia [1 ]
Jing, Xiaorong [1 ]
Kang, Yan [2 ]
机构
[1] Sichuan Univ, West China Hosp, Dept Resp Care, Guoxue Alley 37, Chengdu 610041, Sichuan, Peoples R China
[2] Sichuan Univ, West China Hosp, Dept Crit Care Med, Guoxue Alley 37, Chengdu 610041, Sichuan, Peoples R China
来源
BMC PULMONARY MEDICINE | 2024年 / 24卷 / 01期
关键词
Acute respiratory syndrome distress; Airway pressure release ventilation; Low tidal volume; Mechanical ventilation; Randomized controlled trial; RESPIRATORY-DISTRESS-SYNDROME; MECHANICAL VENTILATION; ADULT PATIENTS; LUNG INJURY; RECRUITMENT; CARE; DERECRUITMENT; GUIDELINES; PHYSIOLOGY; TIME;
D O I
10.1186/s12890-024-03065-y
中图分类号
R56 [呼吸系及胸部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
Background Conventional Mechanical ventilation modes used for individuals suffering from acute respiratory distress syndrome have the potential to exacerbate lung injury through regional alveolar overinflation and/or repetitive alveolar collapse with shearing, known as atelectrauma. Animal studies have demonstrated that airway pressure release ventilation (APRV) offers distinct advantages over conventional mechanical ventilation modes. However, the methodologies for implementing APRV vary widely, and the findings from clinical studies remain controversial. This study (APRVplus trial), aims to assess the impact of an early pathophysiology-driven APRV ventilation approach compared to a low tidal volume ventilation (LTV) strategy on the prognosis of patients with moderate to severe ARDS.Methods The APRVplus trial is a prospective, multicenter, randomized clinical trial, building upon our prior single-center study, to enroll 840 patients from at least 35 hospitals in China. This investigation plans to compare the early pathophysiology-driven APRV ventilation approach with the control intervention of LTV lung-protective ventilation. The primary outcome measure will be all-cause mortality at 28 days after randomization in the intensive care units (ICU). Secondary outcome measures will include assessments of oxygenation, and physiology parameters at baseline, as well as on days 1, 2, and 3. Additionally, clinical outcomes such as ventilator-free days at 28 days, duration of ICU and hospital stay, ICU and hospital mortality, and the occurrence of adverse events will be evaluated.Methods The APRVplus trial is a prospective, multicenter, randomized clinical trial, building upon our prior single-center study, to enroll 840 patients from at least 35 hospitals in China. This investigation plans to compare the early pathophysiology-driven APRV ventilation approach with the control intervention of LTV lung-protective ventilation. The primary outcome measure will be all-cause mortality at 28 days after randomization in the intensive care units (ICU). Secondary outcome measures will include assessments of oxygenation, and physiology parameters at baseline, as well as on days 1, 2, and 3. Additionally, clinical outcomes such as ventilator-free days at 28 days, duration of ICU and hospital stay, ICU and hospital mortality, and the occurrence of adverse events will be evaluated.Trial ethics and dissemination The research project has obtained approval from the Ethics Committee of West China Hospital of Sichuan University (2019-337). Informed consent is required. The results will be submitted for publication in a peer-reviewed journal and presented at one or more scientific conferences.Trial registration The study was registered at Clinical Trials.gov (NCT03549910) on June 8, 2018.
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 42 条
  • [31] Erratum to Protective intraoperative ventilation with higher versus lower levels of positive end-expiratory pressure in obese patients (PROBESE): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial
    T. Bluth
    R. Teichmann
    T. Kiss
    I. Bobek
    J. Canet
    G. Cinnella
    L. De Baerdemaeker
    C. Gregoretti
    G. Hedenstierna
    S. N. Hemmes
    M. Hiesmayr
    M. W. Hollmann
    S. Jaber
    J. G. Laffey
    M. J. Licker
    K. Markstaller
    I. Matot
    G. Müller
    G. H. Mills
    J. P. Mulier
    C. Putensen
    R. Rossaint
    J. Schmitt
    M. Senturk
    A. Serpa Neto
    P. Severgnini
    J. Sprung
    M. F. Vidal Melo
    H. Wrigge
    M. J. Schultz
    P. Pelosi
    Marcelo Gama de Abreu
    Trials, 18
  • [32] Protective ventilation with high versus low positive end-expiratory pressure during one-lung ventilation for thoracic surgery (PROTHOR): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial (vol 20, 213, 2019)
    Kiss, T.
    Wittenstein, J.
    Becker, C.
    Birr, K.
    Cinnella, G.
    Cohen, E.
    El Tahan, M. R.
    Falcao, L. F.
    Gregoretti, C.
    Granell, M.
    Hachenberg, T.
    Hollmann, M. W.
    Jankovic, R.
    Karzai, W.
    Krassler, J.
    Loop, T.
    Licker, M. J.
    Marczin, N.
    Mills, G. H.
    Murrell, M. T.
    Neskovic, V.
    Nisnevitch-Savarese, Z.
    Pelosi, P.
    Rossaint, R.
    Schultz, M. J.
    Neto, A. Serpa
    Severgnini, P.
    Szegedi, L.
    Vegh, T.
    Voyagis, G.
    Zhong, J.
    de Abreu, M. Gama
    Senturk, M.
    TRIALS, 2019, 20 (1)
  • [33] Protective intraoperative ventilation with higher versus lower levels of positive end-expiratory pressure in obese patients (PROBESE): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial (vol 18, pg 202, 2017)
    Bluth, T.
    Teichmann, R.
    Kiss, T.
    Bobek, I.
    Canet, J.
    Cinnella, G.
    De Baerdemaeker, L.
    Gregoretti, C.
    Hedenstierna, G.
    Hemmes, S. N.
    Hiesmayr, M.
    Hollmann, M. W.
    Jaber, S.
    Laffey, J. G.
    Licker, M. J.
    Markstaller, K.
    Matot, I.
    Mueller, G.
    Mills, G. H.
    Mulier, J. P.
    Putensen, C.
    Rossaint, R.
    Schmitt, J.
    Senturk, M.
    Serpa Neto, A.
    Severgnini, P.
    Sprung, J.
    Melo, M. F. Vidal
    Wrigge, H.
    Schultz, M. J.
    Pelosi, P.
    de Abreu, Marcelo Gama
    TRIALS, 2017, 18
  • [34] A perioperative surgeon-controlled open-lung approach versus conventional protective ventilation with low positive end-expiratory pressure in cardiac surgery with cardiopulmonary bypass (PROVECS): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial
    Lagier, David
    Fischer, Francois
    Fornier, William
    Fellahi, Jean-Luc
    Colson, Pascal
    Cholley, Bernard
    Jaber, Samir
    Baumstarck, Karine
    Guidon, Catherine
    TRIALS, 2018, 19
  • [35] A perioperative surgeon-controlled open-lung approach versus conventional protective ventilation with low positive end-expiratory pressure in cardiac surgery with cardiopulmonary bypass (PROVECS): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial
    David Lagier
    François Fischer
    William Fornier
    Jean-Luc Fellahi
    Pascal Colson
    Bernard Cholley
    Samir Jaber
    Karine Baumstarck
    Catherine Guidon
    Trials, 19
  • [36] Non-invasive high-frequency oscillatory ventilation versus nasal continuous positive airway pressure in preterm infants with respiratory distress syndrome: Study protocol for a multi-center prospective randomized controlled trial
    Zhu, Xing-Wang
    Shi, Yuan
    Shi, Li-Ping
    Liu, Ling
    Xue, Jiang
    Ramanathan, Rangasamy
    TRIALS, 2018, 19
  • [37] Non-invasive high-frequency oscillatory ventilation versus nasal continuous positive airway pressure in preterm infants with respiratory distress syndrome: Study protocol for a multi-center prospective randomized controlled trial
    Xing-Wang Zhu
    Yuan Shi
    Li-Ping Shi
    Ling Liu
    Jiang Xue
    Rangasamy Ramanathan
    Trials, 19
  • [38] Effect of driving pressure-guided individualized positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) ventilation strategy on postoperative atelectasis in patients undergoing laparoscopic surgery as assessed by ultrasonography: study protocol for a prospective randomized controlled trial
    Zhang, Yi
    Zhu, Jiayu
    Xi, Chunhua
    Wang, Guyan
    TRIALS, 2025, 26 (01)
  • [39] A multicenter, randomized controlled, non-inferiority trial, comparing nasal continuous positive airway pressure with nasal intermittent positive pressure ventilation as primary support before minimally invasive surfactant administration for preterm infants with respiratory distress syndrome (the NIV-MISA-RDS trial): Study protocol
    Zhang, Hui
    Li, Jun
    Zeng, Lin
    Gao, Yajuan
    Zhao, Wanjun
    Han, Tongyan
    Tong, Xiaomei
    FRONTIERS IN PEDIATRICS, 2022, 10
  • [40] Randomised controlled trial comparing efficacy and safety of high versus low Low-Molecular Weight Heparin dosages in hospitalized patients with severe COVID-19 pneumonia and coagulopathy not requiring invasive mechanical ventilation (COVID-19 HD): a structured summary of a study protocol
    Marco Marietta
    Paola Vandelli
    Pasquale Mighali
    Roberto Vicini
    Valeria Coluccio
    Roberto D’Amico
    Trials, 21