An artificial neural network based approach for predicting the proton beam spot dosimetric characteristics of a pencil beam scanning technique

被引:1
|
作者
Ranjith, C. P. [1 ,2 ]
Krishnan, Mayakannan [1 ]
Raveendran, Vysakh [2 ]
Chaudhari, Lalit [2 ]
Laskar, Siddhartha [2 ]
机构
[1] DY Patil Educ Soc Deemed Be Univ, Ghaziabad, India
[2] Homi Bhabha Natl Inst, Adv Ctr Treatment Res & Educ Canc, Dept Radiat Oncol, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India
关键词
machine learning; pencil beam scanning; quality assurance; log file; proton therapy; HEAD;
D O I
10.1088/2057-1976/ad3ce0
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Utilising Machine Learning (ML) models to predict dosimetric parameters in pencil beam scanning proton therapy presents a promising and practical approach. The study developed Artificial Neural Network (ANN) models to predict proton beam spot size and relative positional errors using 9000 proton spot data. The irradiation log files as input variables and corresponding scintillation detector measurements as the label values. The ANN models were developed to predict six variables: spot size in the x-axis, y-axis, major axis, minor axis, and relative positional errors in the x-axis and y-axis. All ANN models used a Multi-layer perception (MLP) network using one input layer, three hidden layers, and one output layer. Model performance was validated using various statistical tools. The log file recorded spot size and relative positional errors, which were compared with scintillator-measured data. The Root Mean Squared Error (RMSE) values for the x-spot and y-spot sizes were 0.356 mm and 0.362 mm, respectively. Additionally, the maximum variation for the x-spot relative positional error was 0.910 mm, while for the y-spot, it was 1.610 mm. The ANN models exhibit lower prediction errors. Specifically, the RMSE values for spot size prediction in the x, y, major, and minor axes are 0.053 mm, 0.049 mm, 0.053 mm, and 0.052 mm, respectively. Additionally, the relative spot positional error prediction model for the x and y axes yielded maximum errors of 0.160 mm and 0.170 mm, respectively. The normality of models was validated using the residual histogram and Q-Q plot. The data over fit, and bias were tested using K (k = 5) fold cross-validation, and the maximum RMSE value of the K fold cross-validation among all the six ML models was less than 0.150 mm (R-Square 0.960). All the models showed excellent prediction accuracy. Accurately predicting beam spot size and positional errors enhances efficiency in routine dosimetric checks.
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Impact of range shifter material on proton pencil beam spot characteristics
    Shen, Jiajian
    Liu, Wei
    Anand, Aman
    Stoker, Joshua B.
    Ding, Xiaoning
    Fatyga, Mirek
    Herman, Michael G.
    Bues, Martin
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2015, 42 (03) : 1335 - 1353
  • [22] Impact of magnetic field regulation in conjunction with the volumetric repainting technique on the spot positions and beam range in pencil beam scanning proton therapy
    Rana, Suresh
    Bennouna, Jaafar
    Gutierrez, Alonso N.
    Rosenfeld, Anatoly B.
    JOURNAL OF APPLIED CLINICAL MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2020, 21 (11): : 124 - 131
  • [23] Integration and dosimetric validation of a dynamic collimation system for pencil beam scanning proton therapy
    Nelson, Nicholas P.
    Culberson, Wesley S.
    Hyer, Daniel E.
    Geoghegan, Theodore J.
    Patwardhan, Kaustubh A.
    Smith, Blake R.
    Flynn, Ryan T.
    Gutierrez, Alonso N.
    Boland, Thibault
    Hill, Patrick M.
    BIOMEDICAL PHYSICS & ENGINEERING EXPRESS, 2023, 9 (06)
  • [24] Dosimetric comparison of VMAT and pencil beam scanning proton therapy for abdominal pediatric tumors
    Guerreiro, F.
    Seravalli, E.
    Janssens, G. O.
    Maduro, J. H.
    Brouwer, C. L.
    Korevaar, E. W.
    Knopf, A. C.
    Raaymakers, B. W.
    RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2018, 127 : S885 - S886
  • [25] Dosimetric Impact of CT Metal Artifacts on Proton Pencil-Beam Scanning Delivery
    Verburg, J.
    Joshi, M.
    Bazalova, M.
    Madden, T.
    Kooy, H.
    Seco, J.
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2010, 37 (06)
  • [26] An approach for estimating dosimetric uncertainties in deformable dose accumulation in pencil beam scanning proton therapy for lung cancer
    Amstutz, Florian
    Nenoff, Lena
    Albertini, Francesca
    Ribeiro, Cassia O.
    Knopf, Antje C.
    Unkelbach, Jan
    Weber, Damien C.
    Lomax, Antony J.
    Zhang, Ye
    PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 2021, 66 (10):
  • [27] Dosimetry Characteristics of the Discrete Spot Scanning Proton Beam at PTCH
    Gillin, M.
    Zhu, X.
    Sahoo, N.
    Bues, M.
    Ciangaru, G.
    Arjomandy, B.
    Poenisch, F.
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2008, 35 (06)
  • [28] An adaptive spot placement method on Cartesian grid for pencil beam scanning proton therapy
    Lin, Bowen
    Fu, Shujun
    Lin, Yuting
    Rotondo, Ronny L.
    Huang, Weizhang
    Li, Harold H.
    Chen, Ronald C.
    Gao, Hao
    PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 2021, 66 (23):
  • [29] Criteria of spot asymmetry in proton radiotherapy pencil beam scanning - a Monte Carlo study
    Klodowska, M.
    Gajewski, J.
    Skowronska, K.
    Olko, P.
    RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2016, 118 : S57 - S58
  • [30] Effects of spot size errors in DynamicARC pencil beam scanning proton therapy planning
    Rana, Suresh
    Rosenfeld, Anatoly B.
    PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 2024, 69 (23):