Research on comparison of different algorithms in diagnosing faults of aircraft engines

被引:0
|
作者
Li L. [1 ]
机构
[1] COMAC Shanghai Aircraft Customer Service Co Ltd, Shanghai
关键词
Air flow; Aircraft engine; Fault diagnosis; Fuel-air ratio; Particle swarm optimization-back-propagation; Random forest;
D O I
10.1590/jatm.v13.1229
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
For the aircraft, the engine is its core component. Once the engine fails, the flight safety will be seriously affected; therefore, it is necessary to diagnose the failure in time. This paper briefly introduced three aircraft engine fault diagnosis algorithms based on support vector machine (SVM), random forest, and particle swarm optimization-back-propagation (PSO-BP) and carried out a simulation experiment on the performance of the three algorithms in MATLAB software. The results showed that the PSO-BP- based diagnosis algorithm had the highest recognition accuracy and the SVM-based diagnosis algorithm had the lowest, both for artificial fault data and real fault data. The PSO-BP-based diagnosis algorithm took the least average recognition time, and the SVM-based diagnosis algorithm took the longest time. © 2021, Journal of Aerospace Technology and Management. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] DIAGNOSING HUMAN MALFORMATION PATTERNS WITH A MICROCOMPUTER - EVALUATION OF 2 DIFFERENT ALGORITHMS
    SCHORDERET, DF
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF MEDICAL GENETICS, 1987, 28 (02): : 337 - 344
  • [42] Research of Algorithms for Aircraft Ground Deicing Operation Scheduling Model
    Xing Zhiwei
    Li Yi
    2010 8TH WORLD CONGRESS ON INTELLIGENT CONTROL AND AUTOMATION (WCICA), 2010, : 5973 - 5977
  • [43] Reliability of Different Fault Detection Algorithms under High Impedance Faults
    Prasad, Ch. Durga
    Srinivasu, N.
    Prasad, D. J. V.
    Saiveerraju, M.
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 2013 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON ADVANCED COMPUTING & COMMUNICATION SYSTEMS (ICACCS), 2013,
  • [44] Comparison of Different Algorithms for Sentiment Classification
    Ciric, Milica
    Stanimirovic, Aleksandar
    Petrovic, Nikola
    Stoimenov, Leonid
    2013 11TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON TELECOMMUNICATIONS IN MODERN SATELLITE, CABLE AND BROADCASTING SERVICES (TELSIKS), VOLS 1 AND 2, 2013, : 567 - 570
  • [45] A COMPARISON OF DIFFERENT ALGORITHMS FOR CYLINDRICITY EVALUATION
    MURTHY, TSR
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MACHINE TOOLS & MANUFACTURE, 1982, 22 (04): : 283 - 292
  • [46] A COMPARISON OF DIFFERENT ALGORITHMS FOR CIRCULARITY EVALUATION
    MURTHY, TSR
    PRECISION ENGINEERING-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR PRECISION ENGINEERING, 1986, 8 (01): : 19 - 23
  • [47] Performance Comparison of Different Optimization Algorithms
    Toptas, Buket
    Karadeniz, Esra
    Karci, Ali
    2018 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE AND DATA PROCESSING (IDAP), 2018,
  • [48] A COMPARISON OF DIFFERENT CONTACT ALGORITHMS WITH APPLICATIONS
    BOHM, J
    COMPUTERS & STRUCTURES, 1987, 26 (1-2) : 207 - 221
  • [49] COMPARISON OF 2 DIFFERENT TREE ALGORITHMS
    MAKINO, J
    JOURNAL OF COMPUTATIONAL PHYSICS, 1990, 88 (02) : 393 - 408
  • [50] Comparison of Different Dichotomous Classification Algorithms
    Zhuravlev, Yu, I
    Ryazanov, V. Vl
    Ryazanov, Vl V.
    Aslanyan, L. H.
    Sahakyan, H. A.
    PATTERN RECOGNITION AND IMAGE ANALYSIS, 2020, 30 (03) : 303 - 314