Usage of Hybrid Project Management Approaches and Inflluences on Approach Selection

被引:0
|
作者
Reed, April H. [1 ]
Angolia, Mark G. [2 ]
Baham, Corey [3 ]
Igah, Roseline [3 ]
机构
[1] East Carolina Univ, Management Informat Syst Dept, Greenville, NC 27858 USA
[2] East Carolina Univ, Technol Syst Dept, Greenville, NC USA
[3] Oklahoma State Univ, Management Sci & Informat Syst Dept, Stillwater, OK USA
关键词
Project Management Methodology; Hybrid Project Management; Agile Project Management; Predictive Project Management; Adaptive Project Management; Project Tools; SOFTWARE-DEVELOPMENT; AGILE PRACTICES; CHALLENGES;
D O I
10.17705/1CAIS.05415
中图分类号
TP [自动化技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
Changes in technologies and practitioner approaches to project management have led to a mix known as hybrid. This research identifies approaches practitioners currently use and determines possible influences on how a project manager selects an approach for a project. Four hundred participants completed a survey questionnaire to help identify methodologies in use. Additionally, participants reviewed a list of 39 specific project management tools and techniques to indicate their level of use for each of them. Our findings indicate that few project managers exclusively employ agile methodologies without the incorporation of predictive techniques and tools. Chi-square analysis was used to analyze industry, project manager experience level, and type of project to determine the influence on approach selection. The results showed that industry and type of project were important to selection, but a project manager's level of experience was not. A qualitative analysis identified two additional important factors of company policy and team experience. Overall, the study supported that there is no best approach to managing projects, but hybrid is emerging as a predominant approach to exploit the benefits of multiple approaches. Additionally, the data implies a need for greater support, resources, or education to facilitate the successful implementation and longevity of adaptive project management approaches.
引用
收藏
页数:28
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Update on Chemotherapeutic Approaches and Management of Bevacizumab Usage for Glioblastoma
    Funakoshi, Yusuke
    Hata, Nobuhiro
    Kuga, Daisuke
    Hatae, Ryusuke
    Sangatsuda, Yuhei
    Fujioka, Yutaka
    Takigawa, Kosuke
    Mizoguchi, Masahiro
    PHARMACEUTICALS, 2020, 13 (12) : 1 - 21
  • [42] Curated materials data of hybrid perovskites: approaches and potential usage
    Chakraborty, Rayan
    Blum, Volker
    TRENDS IN CHEMISTRY, 2023, 5 (10): : 720 - 733
  • [43] A Hybrid Approach for Feature Selection
    Tiwari, Sadhana
    Singh, Birmohan
    2015 THIRD INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON IMAGE INFORMATION PROCESSING (ICIIP), 2015, : 277 - 280
  • [44] A hybrid approach to feature selection
    Boussouf, M
    PRINCIPLES OF DATA MINING AND KNOWLEDGE DISCOVERY, 1998, 1510 : 230 - 238
  • [45] AN INTEGRATED APPROACH TO PROJECT EVALUATION AND SELECTION
    KHORRAMSHAHGOL, R
    AZANI, H
    GOUSTY, Y
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON ENGINEERING MANAGEMENT, 1988, 35 (04) : 265 - 270
  • [46] Project Portfolio Selection: A Newsvendor Approach
    Hu, Qiaohai
    Szmerekovsky, Joseph
    DECISION SCIENCES, 2017, 48 (01) : 176 - 199
  • [47] A fuzzy integrated approach for project selection
    Bolat, Bersam
    Cebi, Ferhan
    Temur, Gul Tekin
    Otay, Irem
    JOURNAL OF ENTERPRISE INFORMATION MANAGEMENT, 2014, 27 (03) : 247 - +
  • [48] A VIKOR Approach for Project Selection Problem
    El-Santawy, Mohamed F.
    Ahmed, A. N.
    LIFE SCIENCE JOURNAL-ACTA ZHENGZHOU UNIVERSITY OVERSEAS EDITION, 2012, 9 (04): : 5878 - 5880
  • [49] Connectionist approaches for solver selection in constrained project scheduling
    Dan Zhu
    Rema Padman
    Annals of Operations Research, 1997, 72 : 265 - 298
  • [50] Impact of Organizational and Project Factors on Acceptance and Usage of Project Management Software and Perceived Project Success
    Ali, Abdullah Saeed Bani
    Anbari, Frank T.
    Money, William H.
    PROJECT MANAGEMENT JOURNAL, 2008, 39 (02) : 5 - 33