Intraincisional Pin Placement is Safe for Robotic-Assisted Total Knee Arthroplasty

被引:1
|
作者
Stetzer, Michael [1 ]
Bircher, James [1 ]
Klika, Alison K. [1 ]
Rullan, Pedro J. [1 ]
Bloomfield, Michael M. [1 ]
Krebs, Viktor E. [1 ]
Molloy, Robert M. [1 ]
Piuzzi, Nicolas S. [1 ]
机构
[1] Cleveland Clin Fdn, Dept Orthopaed Surg, Cleveland, OH 44195 USA
来源
JOURNAL OF ARTHROPLASTY | 2024年 / 39卷 / 04期
关键词
TKA; metaphyseal pin; periprosthetic fracture; infection; reoperation; COMPLICATIONS; SYSTEM;
D O I
10.1016/j.arth.2023.10.050
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: While robotic-arm assisted total knee arthroplasty (RA-TKA) has seen a major increase in its utilization, it requires bone array pins to be fixed into the femur and tibia, which intrinsically carries risk. As it is currently off-label with some robotic platforms to place pins intraincisional, we aimed to evaluate the safety of intraincisional pin placement during RA-TKAs. Methods: A prospective cohort of 2,343 patients who underwent RA-TKA at a North American Healthcare System between January 2018 and March 2022 was included. Primary outcomes included periprosthetic fracture or infection (eg, superficial or deep). Secondary outcomes included 1 -year reoperation rate due to any cause. Cases were retrospectively reviewed to determine whether complications could be attributed to metaphyseal intraincisional pin placement (4.0 mm pins; two tibial and two femoral). The 90-day follow-up was 100% and the 1 -year follow-up rate was 70.6% (n = 1,655). Results: The pin-site related periprosthetic fracture incidence at 90 days was 0.09% (2 out of 2,343). The 90-day infection incidence was 1.4% (superficial: 22; deep: 13). The 1 -year reoperation rate was 1.8% (29 out of 1,655). The most common causes of reoperation at 1 -year were deep infection (n = 14; 0.83%), superficial infection (n = 3; 0.18%), periprosthetic fracture, mechanical symptoms, instability, and hematoma (n = 2; 0.12% for each). Conclusions: One in 1,172 patients may experience a pin-related periprosthetic fracture after RA-TKA with intraincisional bone array pin placement. There was a low 90-day infection incidence and reoperations within 1 -year after RA-TKA were rare. (c) 2023 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:910 / 915.e1
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] A case-matched series comparing functional outcomes for robotic-assisted unicompartmental knee arthroplasty versus functionally aligned robotic-assisted total knee arthroplasty
    Manara, J. R.
    Nixon, M.
    Tippett, B.
    Pretty, W.
    Collopy, D.
    Clark, G. W.
    BONE & JOINT OPEN, 2024, 5 (12): : 1123 - 1129
  • [32] Robotic-Assisted Total Knee Arthroplasty Has Similar Rates of Prosthetic Noise Generation as Conventional Total Knee Arthroplasty
    Cozzarelli, Nicholas F.
    Khan, Irfan A.
    Imam, Nareena
    Klein, Gregg R.
    Levine, Harlan
    Seidenstein, Ari
    Zaid, Musa B.
    Lonner, Jess H.
    ARTHROPLASTY TODAY, 2023, 23
  • [33] Robotic-assisted total knee arthroplasty is comparable to conventional total knee arthroplasty: a meta-analysis and systematic review
    James Randolph Onggo
    Jason Derry Onggo
    Richard De Steiger
    Raphael Hau
    Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery, 2020, 140 : 1533 - 1549
  • [34] Minimal Clinically Important Difference in Robotic-Assisted Total Knee Arthroplasty Versus Standard Manual Total Knee Arthroplasty
    Shaw, Jonathan H.
    Lindsay-Rivera, Kevin G.
    Buckley, Patrick J.
    Weir, Robb M.
    Banka, Trevor R.
    Davis, Jason J.
    JOURNAL OF ARTHROPLASTY, 2021, 36 (07): : S233 - S241
  • [35] Robotic-assisted total knee replacement
    Gosse, F
    Brack, C
    Gotte, H
    Roth, M
    Ruhmann, O
    Schweikard, A
    Vahldiek, M
    ORTHOPADE, 1997, 26 (03): : 258 - 266
  • [36] Robotic-assisted Total Knee Arthroplasty Reduces Radiographic Outliers for Low-volume Total Knee Arthroplasty Surgeons
    Byrne, Connor
    Durst, Caleb
    Rezzadeh, Kevin
    Rockov, Zachary
    Moon, Charles
    Rajaee, Sean
    ARTHROPLASTY TODAY, 2024, 25
  • [37] Robotic-assisted total knee arthroplasty is comparable to conventional total knee arthroplasty: a meta-analysis and systematic review
    Onggo, James Randolph
    Onggo, Jason Derry
    De Steiger, Richard
    Hau, Raphael
    ARCHIVES OF ORTHOPAEDIC AND TRAUMA SURGERY, 2020, 140 (10) : 1533 - 1549
  • [38] Robotic-assisted unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: a review
    Pei Liu
    Fei-fan Lu
    Guo-jie Liu
    Xiao-hong Mu
    Yong-qiang Sun
    Qi-dong Zhang
    Wei-guo Wang
    Wan-shou Guo
    Arthroplasty, 3
  • [39] Robotic-assisted unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: a review
    Liu, Pei
    Lu, Fei-fan
    Liu, Guo-jie
    Mu, Xiao-hong
    Sun, Yong-qiang
    Zhang, Qi-dong
    Wang, Wei-guo
    Guo, Wan-shou
    ARTHROPLASTY, 2021, 3 (01)
  • [40] Comparison of robotic-assisted and conventional manual implantation of a primary total knee arthroplasty
    Park, Sang Eun
    Lee, Chun Taek
    JOURNAL OF ARTHROPLASTY, 2007, 22 (07): : 1054 - 1059