Assessing Robustness and Vulnerability in Interdependent Network Infrastructure: A Multilayer Network Approach

被引:1
|
作者
Huynh, Phat K. [1 ]
Rahman, M. Mishkatur [2 ]
Yadav, Om P. [3 ]
Le, Trung Q. [1 ]
Le, Chau [4 ]
机构
[1] Univ S Florida, Dept Ind & Management Syst Engn, Tampa, FL 33620 USA
[2] North Dakota State Univ, Dept Ind & Mfg Engn, Fargo, ND USA
[3] North Carolina A&T State Univ, Dept Ind & Syst Engn, Greensboro, NC USA
[4] North Dakota State Univ, Dept Civil Construct & Environm Engn, Fargo, ND USA
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
interdependent network infrastructure; multilayer network; cascade failure; robustness analysis; COMPLEX NETWORKS; BEHAVIOR; DYNAMICS; ERROR;
D O I
10.1109/RAMS51492.2024.10457643
中图分类号
TP301 [理论、方法];
学科分类号
081202 ;
摘要
Modern societies profoundly depend upon interdependent critical infrastructure systems, such as the power grid, oil pipeline, gas pipeline, and transportation system, for proper functioning. These systems are extensively interconnected, characterized by their interconnected layers of infrastructures, which presents unique complexities that can complicate their analysis. Furthermore, if one system fails, it can have a ripple effect throughout the entire network. Hence, it is crucial to evaluate the robustness and vulnerability of interdependent critical infrastructure systems with complex inter-layer and intra-layer dependencies to ensure their continued operation and after-math resilience. In response to these challenges, this study presents a method for evaluating the robustness, vulnerability, and efficiency of multi-layer infrastructures using various probabilistic evaluation measures. We considered three key parameters: the number of nodes (N), the denseness of network connections (DL), and node failure probability (p). We modeled these complex systems using Erdos-Renyi graphs and investigated the impact of three parameters: N, DL, and P. We considered two network sizes, N = 50 and N = 100, each divided into two layers with equal nodes. The DL and p parameters represent the distinct characteristics of different infrastructures, which are considered independently for each layer. We simulated four scenarios varying DL and p across layers and examined the topological transformations induced by these variations. The results indicated that a larger network size generally enhances network robustness and efficiency while reducing vulnerability, highlighting the importance of considering network size in multi-layer network design. Also, the interplay between DL and p significantly influences network behavior, with a high DL mitigating the impact of high node failure probabilities on network robustness. These insights offer valuable guidelines for improving network resilience against potential node failures and are crucial for infrastructure designers and network analysts.
引用
收藏
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Exploring Recovery Strategies for Optimal Interdependent Infrastructure Network Resilience
    Almoghathawi, Yasser
    González, Andrés D.
    Barker, Kash
    Barker, Kash (kashbarker@ou.edu), 2021, Springer (21) : 229 - 260
  • [42] Interdependent infrastructure network restoration from a community resilience perspective
    Barker, K.
    Karakoc, D. B.
    Almoghathawi, Y.
    SAFETY AND RELIABILITY - SAFE SOCIETIES IN A CHANGING WORLD, 2018, : 1261 - 1267
  • [43] Vulnerability analysis of interdependent network via integer programming approaches
    Shanshan Hou
    Andres Garrido
    Neng Fan
    Optimization Letters, 2020, 14 : 1921 - 1942
  • [44] Vulnerability analysis of interdependent network via integer programming approaches
    Hou, Shanshan
    Garrido, Andres
    Fan, Neng
    OPTIMIZATION LETTERS, 2020, 14 (07) : 1921 - 1942
  • [45] Multi-level approach to assessing the resilience of road network infrastructure
    Borghetti, Fabio
    Petrenj, Boris
    Trucco, Paolo
    Calabrese, Veronica
    Ponti, Marco
    Marchionni, Giovanna
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CRITICAL INFRASTRUCTURES, 2021, 17 (02) : 97 - 132
  • [46] Assessing seismic vulnerability of urban road networks by a Bayesian network approach
    Tang, Yun
    Huang, Shuping
    TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH PART D-TRANSPORT AND ENVIRONMENT, 2019, 77 : 390 - 402
  • [47] Comparative approaches for assessing network vulnerability
    Grubesic, Tony H.
    Matisziw, Timothy C.
    Murray, Alan T.
    Snediker, Diane
    INTERNATIONAL REGIONAL SCIENCE REVIEW, 2008, 31 (01) : 88 - 112
  • [48] A model for vulnerability analysis of interdependent infrastructure networks
    Johansson, J.
    Jonsson, H.
    SAFETY, RELIABILITY AND RISK ANALYSIS: THEORY, METHODS AND APPLICATIONS, VOLS 1-4, 2009, : 2491 - +
  • [49] Assessing network vulnerability using shortest path network problems
    Ye, Qian
    Kim, Hyun
    JOURNAL OF TRANSPORTATION SAFETY & SECURITY, 2021, 13 (01) : 1 - 25
  • [50] Modeling the damage and recovery of interdependent civil infrastructure network using Dynamic Integrated Network model
    He, Xian
    Cha, Eun Jeong
    SUSTAINABLE AND RESILIENT INFRASTRUCTURE, 2020, 5 (03) : 152 - 167