An artificial intelligence workflow for horizon volume generation from 3D seismic data

被引:0
|
作者
Abubakar A. [1 ]
Di H. [1 ]
Li Z. [1 ]
Maniar H. [1 ]
Zhao T. [1 ]
机构
[1] Slb, Houston, TX
来源
Leading Edge | 2024年 / 43卷 / 04期
关键词
3D; AI; artificial intelligence; interpretation; seismic;
D O I
10.1190/tle43040235.1
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Horizon-based subsurface stratigraphic model building is a tedious process, especially in geologically complex areas where seismic data are contaminated with noise and thus are of weak and discontinuous reflectors. Seismic interpreters usually use stratal (proportional) slices to approximately inspect 3D seismic data along seismic reflectors yet to be interpreted. We introduce an artificial intelligence workflow consisting of three deep learning steps to provide a conditioned seismic image that is easier to interpret, a stratigraphic model that outlines major formations, and moreover a relative geologic time volume that allows us to automatically extract an infinite number of horizons along any seismic reflectors within a seismic cube. Depending on the availability of interpreters, the proposed workflow can either run fully unsupervised without human inputs or using sparse horizon interpretation as constraints to further improve the quality of extracted horizons, providing flexibility in both efficiency and quality. Starting from only seismic images and a few key horizons interpreted on very sparse seismic lines, we demonstrate the workflow to generate a stack of complete horizons covering the entire seismic volume from offshore Australia. © 2024 The Authors. Published by the Society of Exploration Geophysicists.
引用
收藏
页码:235 / 243
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Subduction megathrust heterogeneity characterized from 3D seismic data
    Kirkpatrick, James D.
    Edwards, Joel H.
    Verdecchia, Alessandro
    Kluesner, Jared W.
    Harrington, Rebecca M.
    Silver, Eli A.
    NATURE GEOSCIENCE, 2020, 13 (05) : 369 - 374
  • [22] Subduction megathrust heterogeneity characterized from 3D seismic data
    James D. Kirkpatrick
    Joel H. Edwards
    Alessandro Verdecchia
    Jared W. Kluesner
    Rebecca M. Harrington
    Eli A. Silver
    Nature Geoscience, 2020, 13 : 369 - 374
  • [23] Crossline Reconstruction of 3D Seismic Data Using 3D cWGAN: A Comparative Study on Sleipner Seismic Survey Data
    Yu, Jiyun
    Yoon, Daeung
    APPLIED SCIENCES-BASEL, 2023, 13 (10):
  • [24] A new automated workflow for 3D character creation based on 3D scanned data
    Sibiryakov, A
    Ju, XY
    Nebel, JC
    VIRTUAL STORYTELLING, PROCEEDINGS: USING VIRTUAL REALITY TECHNOLOGIES FOR STORYTELLING, 2003, 2897 : 155 - 158
  • [25] Triangular mesh generation from 3D vision data
    Bradley, C
    Archibald, I
    Chan, VH
    THREE-DIMENSIONAL IMAGING AND LASER-BASED SYSTEMS FOR METROLOGY AND INSPECTION III, 1997, 3204 : 192 - 201
  • [26] Bump map generation from 3D scan data
    Oh, ST
    Lee, KH
    2003 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON GEOMETRIC MODELING AND GRAPHICS, PROCEEDINGS, 2003, : 180 - 185
  • [27] 3D Model Data Generation and Conversion for 3D Printers
    Sungsuk Kim
    Journal of Electronic Materials, 2015, 44 : 815 - 822
  • [28] 3D Model Data Generation and Conversion for 3D Printers
    Kim, Sungsuk
    JOURNAL OF ELECTRONIC MATERIALS, 2015, 44 (03) : 815 - 822
  • [29] 3D interpretation of geological, 3D seismic and conventional geophysical data from the Darlot Gold Mine
    Pears G.
    Reid J.
    McGaughey J.
    Turner W.
    Hird G.
    Exploration Geophysics, 2019, 2019 (01) : 1 - 5
  • [30] Monitoring of water volume in a porous reservoir using seismic data: A 3D simulation study
    Khalili, M.
    Goransson, P.
    Hesthaven, J. S.
    Pasanen, A.
    Vauhkonen, M.
    Lahivaara, T.
    JOURNAL OF APPLIED GEOPHYSICS, 2024, 229