Eliciting citizens' priorities for active travel infrastructure investments: A qualitative analysis of best-worst scaling experiments

被引:1
|
作者
Albahlal, Fahad [1 ]
Haggar, Paul [2 ]
Potoglou, Dimitris [1 ]
机构
[1] Cardiff Univ, Sch Geog & Planning, Cardiff CF10 3WA, Wales
[2] Univ Bath, Dept Psychol, Bath BA2 7AY, England
关键词
Walking infrastructure investment; Cycling infrastructure investment; Cognitive interviewing; Best-worst scaling; Walking; Cycling; BUILT ENVIRONMENT; QUESTIONS; HEALTH; AUDIT; TIMES; WALKABILITY; RELIABILITY; INSTRUMENT; COMPLEXITY; CONCRETE;
D O I
10.1016/j.jth.2024.101795
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Introduction: The built environment plays an important role in individuals' propensity to walk and cycle and local authorities increasingly invest financial resources towards its development. Organisations responsible for the built environment have developed auditing tools as guidelines to inspect routes and identify improvements to support active travel. Methods: Using these auditing tools as a starting point, this study developed 21 walking and 25 cycling investment -relevant factors that were embedded into two choice-based survey instruments, respectively. The study used cognitive interview pre -testing to internally validate a preference-based elicitation approach known as Best-Worst Scaling (BWS), which aimed to capture pedestrian and cyclist preferences. We report findings from cognitive interviews (data analysed thematically) with 20 participants (10 pedestrians and 10 cyclists). Results: In both sets of interviews, four themes emerged regarding how the participants approached the BWS task and five themes related to the understanding of the factors. The BWS choice tasks required refinement regarding the 'frame of reference', 'travel context', the 'decisionmaking strategy', and the 'concrete thinking' (finding some factors easier to interpret). Additionally, issues with understanding the factors, the wording, 'overlapping', negatively phrased factors, and technical jargon all pointed towards the need to refine auditing tools if these were to be introduced in a preference elicitation context. Conclusions: This study helps to empirically uncover how citizens interpret infrastructure related aspects of walking and cycling by pointing to nuanced aspects that auditing tools may miss. The findings also helped develop an internally consistent preference elicitation survey-instrument that any local authority can implement to determine which walking and cycling infrastructure investments are a priority in their area.
引用
收藏
页数:19
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Discrete choice experiments or best-worst scaling? A qualitative study to determine the suitability of preference elicitation tasks in research with children and young people
    Rogers, Helen J.
    Marshman, Zoe
    Rodd, Helen
    Rowen, Donna
    JOURNAL OF PATIENT-REPORTED OUTCOMES, 2021, 5 (01)
  • [32] Discrete choice experiments or best-worst scaling? A qualitative study to determine the suitability of preference elicitation tasks in research with children and young people
    Helen J. Rogers
    Zoe Marshman
    Helen Rodd
    Donna Rowen
    Journal of Patient-Reported Outcomes, 5
  • [33] Eliciting SF-6Dv2 health state utilities using an anchored best-worst scaling technique
    Osman, Ahmed M. Y.
    Wu, Jing
    He, Xiaoning
    Chen, Gang
    SOCIAL SCIENCE & MEDICINE, 2021, 279
  • [34] TREATMENT OUTCOME PRIORITIES FOR YOUTH WITH MULTI-MORBID MENTAL HEALTH CONDITIONS: A LATENT CLASS ANALYSIS OF A BEST-WORST SCALING EXPERIMENT
    dosReis, S.
    Castillo, Camelo W.
    Ross, M.
    N'Dri, L.
    Butler, B.
    VALUE IN HEALTH, 2018, 21 : S127 - S127
  • [35] Using Best-Worst Scaling Choice Experiments to Measure Public Perceptions and Preferences for Healthcare Reform in Australia
    Jordan J. Louviere
    Terry N. Flynn
    The Patient: Patient-Centered Outcomes Research, 2010, 3 : 275 - 283
  • [36] Bridge Infrastructure Resilience Analysis Against Seismic Hazard Using Best-Worst Methods
    Khan, Md Saiful Arif
    Kabir, Golam
    Billah, Muntasir
    Dutta, Subhrajit
    ADVANCES IN BEST-WORST METHOD, BWM2021, 2022, : 95 - 109
  • [37] Using Best-Worst Scaling Choice Experiments to Measure Public Perceptions and Preferences for Healthcare Reform in Australia
    Louviere, Jordan J.
    Flynn, Terry N.
    PATIENT-PATIENT CENTERED OUTCOMES RESEARCH, 2010, 3 (04): : 275 - 283
  • [38] Will greenhouse concerns impact meat consumption? Best-worst scaling analysis of Australian consumers
    Rolfe, John
    Rajapaksa, Darshana
    De Valck, Jeremy
    Star, Megan
    FOOD QUALITY AND PREFERENCE, 2023, 104
  • [39] Consumers' Preferences for Digital Corporate Content on Company Websites: A Best-Worst Scaling Analysis
    Koob, Clemens
    JOURNAL OF THEORETICAL AND APPLIED ELECTRONIC COMMERCE RESEARCH, 2023, 18 (03): : 1301 - 1319
  • [40] Comparing results of ranking conjoint analyses, best-worst scaling and discrete choice experiments in a nonhypothetical context
    Yangui, Ahmed
    Akaichi, Faical
    Costa-Font, Montserrat
    Maria Gil, Jose
    AUSTRALIAN JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL AND RESOURCE ECONOMICS, 2019, 63 (02) : 221 - 246