Transoral robotic surgery for oropharyngeal cancer: a systematic review on the role of margin status

被引:0
|
作者
Albi, Cecilia [1 ,2 ]
Ciorba, Andrea [1 ,2 ]
Bianchini, Chiara [1 ,2 ]
Cammaroto, Giovanni [3 ]
Pelucchi, Stefano [1 ,2 ]
Sgarzani, Rossella [4 ]
Gessaroli, Manlio [5 ]
De Vito, Andrea [3 ]
Vicini, Claudio [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Meccariello, Giuseppe [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Hosp Ferrara, ENT, Viaaldo Moro 8, I-44124 Ferrara, Italy
[2] Univ Hosp Ferrara, Dept Neurosci, Audiol Unit, Viaaldo Moro 8, I-44124 Ferrara, Italy
[3] Morgagni Pierantoni Hosp, ENT Unit, Azienda USL Romagna, Forli, Forli Cesena, Italy
[4] Maurizio Bufalini Hosp, Ctr Major Burns, Unit Plast Surg, Cesena, Forli Cesena, Italy
[5] Maurizio Bufalini Hosp, Unit Maxillofacial Surg, Cesena, Forli Cesena, Italy
来源
关键词
Oropharyngeal neoplasms; Robotic surgical procedures; Human papilloma viruses; SQUAMOUS-CELL CARCINOMA; QUALITY-OF-LIFE; FUNCTIONAL OUTCOMES; ONCOLOGIC OUTCOMES; RESECTION; HEAD; FEASIBILITY; THERAPY; SALVAGE; IMPACT;
D O I
10.23736/S2724-5691.24.10235-3
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
INTRODUCTION: Nowadays, robotic surgery finds application in the field of head and neck in the treatment of oropharyngeal tumors. The aim of this work is to examine the efficacy of transoral robotic surgery (TORS) in performing safe oncological resections of oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (OPSCC), with particular attention to the status of margins. EVIDENCE ACQUISITION: Literature search of English -language studies focused on TORS through PubMed, the Cochrane Library and EMBASE databases. A total of 431 papers returned to search, but only 24 met the inclusion criteria. The review was performed according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta -Analysis (PRISMA) Guidelines. EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS: Within the selected studies, the overall rate of OPSCC positive margins following TORS is minimal, especially when patient selection is adequate and when TORS is used by high volume centers. CONCLUSIONS: TORS is a very precise and viable therapeutic tool that provides good results in terms of surgical radicality with low positive margin rates and good results in terms of overall survival and disease -free survival; however, there is still a great heterogeneity in margins definition within the available literature. Consequently, even if this surgical approach is very promising, it is still challenging to draw firm conclusions nowadays.
引用
收藏
页码:346 / 353
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Oncological and functional outcomes of transoral robotic surgery for oropharyngeal cancer
    Park, Young Min
    Kim, Won Shik
    Byeon, Hyung Kwon
    Lee, Sei Young
    Kim, Se-Heon
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF ORAL & MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, 2013, 51 (05): : 408 - 412
  • [22] Oncologic and functional outcomes of transoral robotic surgery for oropharyngeal cancer
    Park, Young Min
    Kim, Won Shik
    Byeon, Hyung Kwon
    Kim, Se-Heon
    ORAL ONCOLOGY, 2013, 49 : S45 - S45
  • [23] Transoral robotic surgery for oropharyngeal cancer in the era of chemoradiation therapy
    Meccariello, Giuseppe
    Cammaroto, Giovanni
    Iannella, Giannicola
    De Vito, Andrea
    Ciorba, Andrea
    Bianchini, Chiara
    Corazzi, Virginia
    Pelucchi, Stefano
    Vicini, Claudio
    Capaccio, Pasquale
    AURIS NASUS LARYNX, 2022, 49 (04) : 535 - 546
  • [24] Understanding contraindications for transoral robotic surgery (TORS) for oropharyngeal cancer
    Weinstein, Gregory S.
    O'Malley, Bert W., Jr.
    Rinaldo, Alessandra
    Silver, Carl E.
    Werner, Jochen A.
    Ferlito, Alfio
    EUROPEAN ARCHIVES OF OTO-RHINO-LARYNGOLOGY, 2015, 272 (07) : 1551 - 1552
  • [25] Pain management following transoral robotic surgery for oropharyngeal squamous cell Carcinoma: A systematic review
    Sankar, George B.
    Daher, Ghazal S.
    Peraza, Lazaro R.
    Moore, Eric J.
    Price, Daniel L.
    Tasche, Kendall K.
    Yin, Linda X.
    Weingarten, Toby N.
    Van Abel, Kathryn M.
    ORAL ONCOLOGY, 2025, 161
  • [26] Transoral robotic surgery for oropharyngeal cancer: patient selection and special considerations
    Baskin, R. Michael
    Boyce, Brian J.
    Amdur, Robert
    Mendenhall, William M.
    Hitchcock, Kathryn
    Silver, Natalie
    Dziegielewski, Peter T.
    CANCER MANAGEMENT AND RESEARCH, 2018, 10 : 839 - 846
  • [27] TRANSORAL ROBOTIC SURGERY SUCCESSFUL FOR PATIENTS WITH OROPHARYNGEAL CANCER, RESEARCHERS REPORT
    不详
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN DENTAL ASSOCIATION, 2012, 143 (04): : 335 - 335
  • [28] Oropharyngeal reconstruction after transoral robotic surgery
    Silverman, Dustin A.
    Birkeland, Andrew C.
    Bewley, Arnaud F.
    CURRENT OPINION IN OTOLARYNGOLOGY & HEAD AND NECK SURGERY, 2022, 30 (05): : 384 - 391
  • [29] Transoral Robotic Surgery for Advanced Oropharyngeal Carcinoma
    Weinstein, Gregory S.
    O'Malley, Bert W., Jr.
    Cohen, Marc A.
    Quon, Harry
    ARCHIVES OF OTOLARYNGOLOGY-HEAD & NECK SURGERY, 2010, 136 (11) : 1079 - 1085
  • [30] The impact of transoral robotic surgery on the overall treatment of oropharyngeal cancer patients
    Smith, Richard V.
    Schiff, Bradley A.
    Garg, Madhur
    Haigentz, Missak
    LARYNGOSCOPE, 2015, 125 : S1 - S15