Prediction of endovascular leaks after thoracic endovascular aneurysm repair though machine learning applied to pre-procedural computed tomography angiographs

被引:1
|
作者
Masuda, Takanori [1 ]
Baba, Yasutaka [2 ]
Nakaura, Takeshi [3 ]
Funama, Yoshinori [4 ]
Sato, Tomoyasu [5 ]
Masuda, Shouko [6 ]
Gotanda, Rumi [1 ]
Arao, Keiko [1 ]
Imaizumi, Hiromasa [1 ]
Arao, Shinichi [1 ]
Ono, Atsushi [1 ]
Hiratsuka, Junichi [1 ]
Awai, Kazuo [7 ]
机构
[1] Kawasaki Univ Med Welf, Fac Hlth Sci & Technol, Dept Radiol Technol, 288 Matsushima, Kurashiki, Okayama 7010193, Japan
[2] Saitama Med Univ, Int Med Ctr, Dept Diagnost Radiol, 1397-1 Yamane, Hidaka, Saitama 3501298, Japan
[3] Kumamoto Univ, Grad Sch Med Sci, Dept Diagnost Radiol, 1-1-1 Honjo, Kumamoto 8608556, Japan
[4] Kumamoto Univ, Fac Life Sci, Dept Med Phys, 1-1-1 Honjo, Kumamoto 8608556, Japan
[5] Tsuchiya Gen Hosp, Dept Diagnost Radiol, Naka Ku, Nakajima Cho 3-30, Hiroshima 7308655, Japan
[6] Kawamura Clin, Dept Radiol Technol, Naka Ku, Hiroshima 7300051, Japan
[7] Hiroshima Univ, Grad Sch Biomed Sci, Dept Diagnost Radiol, Minami Ku, Kasumi 1-2-3, Hiroshima 7348551, Japan
关键词
Thoracic endovascular aneurysm repair; Machine learning; Computed tomography; Computed tomography angiography; Aortic aneurysms; Endoleaks; STENT-GRAFT; AORTIC DISSECTION; ARCH;
D O I
10.1007/s13246-024-01429-6
中图分类号
R318 [生物医学工程];
学科分类号
0831 ;
摘要
To predict endoleaks after thoracic endovascular aneurysm repair (TEVAR) we submitted patient characteristics and vessel features observed on pre- operative computed tomography angiography (CTA) to machine-learning. We evaluated 1-year follow-up CT scans (arterial and delayed phases) in patients who underwent TEVAR for the presence or absence of an endoleak. We evaluated the effect of machine learning of the patient age, sex, weight, and height, plus 22 vascular features on the ability to predict post-TEVAR endoleaks. The extreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost) for ML system was trained on 14 patients with- and 131 without endoleaks. We calculated their importance by applying XGBoost to machine learning and compared our findings between with those of conventional vessel measurement-based methods such as the 22 vascular features by using the Pearson correlation coefficients. Pearson correlation coefficient and 95% confidence interval (CI) were r = 0.86 and 0.75 to 0.92 for the machine learning, r = - 0.44 and - 0.56 to - 0.29 for the vascular angle, and r = - 0.19 and - 0.34 to - 0.02 for the diameter between the subclavian artery and the aneurysm (Fig. 3a-c, all: p < 0.05). With machine-learning, the univariate analysis was significant higher compared with the vascular angle and in the diameter between the subclavian artery and the aneurysm such as the conventional methods (p < 0.05). To predict the risk for post-TEVAR endoleaks, machine learning was superior to the conventional vessel measurement method when factors such as patient characteristics, and vascular features (vessel length, diameter, and angle) were evaluated on pre-TEVAR thoracic CTA images.
引用
收藏
页码:1087 / 1094
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Non-contrast Computed Tomography is Comparable to Contrast-enhanced Computed Tomography for Aortic Volume Analysis after Endovascular Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Repair
    Nambi, P.
    Sengupta, R.
    Krajcer, Z.
    Muthupillai, R.
    Strickman, N.
    Cheong, B. Y. C.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF VASCULAR AND ENDOVASCULAR SURGERY, 2011, 41 (04) : 460 - 466
  • [43] Analysis of Outcomes After Endovascular Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Repair in Patients With Abnormal Findings on the First Postoperative Computed Tomography Angiography
    Geraedts, Anna C. M.
    Mulay, Sana
    van Dieren, Susan
    Koelemay, Mark J. W.
    Balm, Ron
    JOURNAL OF ENDOVASCULAR THERAPY, 2021, 28 (06) : 878 - 887
  • [44] Ultrasound-determined diameter measurements are more accurate than axial computed tomography after endovascular aortic aneurysm repair
    Han, Sukgn M.
    Patel, Kaushel
    Rowe, Vincent L.
    Perese, Susana
    Bond, Aaron
    Weaver, Fred A.
    JOURNAL OF VASCULAR SURGERY, 2010, 51 (06) : 1381 - 1389
  • [45] Dual-energy computed tomography after endovascular aortic aneurysm repair: The role of hard plaque imaging for endoleak detection
    Mueller-Wille, R.
    Borgmann, T.
    Wohlgemuth, W. A.
    Zeman, F.
    Pfister, K.
    Jung, E. M.
    Heiss, P.
    Schreyer, A. G.
    Krauss, B.
    Stroszczynski, C.
    Dornia, C.
    EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 2014, 24 (10) : 2449 - 2457
  • [46] Regarding "Estimating the risk of solid organ malignancy in patients undergoing routine computed tomography scans after endovascular aneurysm repair"
    Paraskevas, Kosmas I.
    Mikhailidis, Dimitri P.
    Veith, Frank J.
    JOURNAL OF VASCULAR SURGERY, 2012, 56 (06) : 1829 - 1829
  • [47] Dual-energy computed tomography after endovascular aortic aneurysm repair: The role of hard plaque imaging for endoleak detection
    R. Müller-Wille
    T. Borgmann
    W. A. Wohlgemuth
    F. Zeman
    K. Pfister
    E. M. Jung
    P. Heiss
    A. G. Schreyer
    B. Krauss
    C. Stroszczynski
    C. Dornia
    European Radiology, 2014, 24 : 2449 - 2457
  • [48] Quantitative analysis of dynamic computed tomography angiography for the detection of endoleaks after abdominal aorta aneurysm endovascular repair: A feasibility study
    Apfaltrer, Georg
    Lavra, Francesco
    Schoepf, U. Joseph
    Scarabello, Marco
    Yamada, Ricardo
    van Assen, Marly
    Varga-Szemes, Akos
    Jacobs, Brian E.
    Bauer, Maximilian J.
    Greenberg, William T.
    Guimaraes, Marcelo
    Saba, Luca
    De Cecco, Carlo N.
    PLOS ONE, 2021, 16 (01):
  • [49] Twelve-Month Computed Tomography Follow-Up after Thoracic Endovascular Repair for Acute Complicated Aortic Dissection
    Pang, Huajin
    Chen, Yong
    He, Xiaofeng
    Tan, Xiangliang
    Wang, Junling
    Yao, Qianqian
    Liu, Xuehan
    ANNALS OF VASCULAR SURGERY, 2021, 71 : 444 - 450
  • [50] Predicting reintervention after thoracic endovascular aortic repair of Stanford type B aortic dissection using machine learning
    Dong, Yuhao
    Que, Lifeng
    Jia, Qianjun
    Xi, Yue
    Zhuang, Jian
    Li, Jinglei
    Liu, Hui
    Chen, Weiqi
    Huang, Meiping
    EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 2022, 32 (01) : 355 - 367