Comparison of femoral neck system versus cannulated cancellous screws for the fixation of femoral neck fracture: a single-center retrospective cohort study

IntroductionThe dynamic hip screw (DHS) and cannulated compression screws (CCS) have been the two implants most frequently employed for the fixation of femoral neck fractures. The objective of this study is to compare clinical and radiographic outcomes between patients treated with the FNS and those treated with CCS.Material and methodsWe conducted a retrospective analysis of a consecutive series of femoral neck fractures treated with FNS or CCS between May 2019 and June 2022. The study included 144 patients who met the inclusion criteria. Collected data encompassed age, sex, Garden fracture classification, Pauwels classification, duration of surgery, length of hospital stays, Harris Hip Score (HHS), complications, and injured side.ResultsThe FNS group comprised 70 patients, while the CCS group consisted of 74 patients. The operation time was 43.6 +/- 12.09 min for the FNS group and 56.47 +/- 22.42 min for the CCS group. At the end of the follow-up, the mean HHS was 87.07 +/- 11.77 for the FNS group and 76.20 +/- 13.64 for the CCS group. The mean reduction in hemoglobin levels from pre- to post-surgery was 1.05 mg/dl in the FNS group and 0.87 mg/dl in the CCS group. The reintervention rate was 8.1% for the CCS group and 2.85% for the FNS group.ConclusionThe FNS does not demonstrate superiority over CCS regarding femoral neck shortening, complication rate, and reduction in hemoglobin levels. However, FNS does appear superior to CCS in terms HHS, operation time, and reoperation rate.