Discharge and flow field simulation of open-channel sewer junction using artificial intelligence methods

被引:20
|
作者
Zaji A.H. [1 ]
Bonakdari H. [1 ]
机构
[1] Department of Civil Engineering, Razi University, Kermanshah
关键词
Discharge prediction; Gene expression programming; Multiple non-linear regression; Open channel; Radial basis neural network; Sewer junction; Velocity field;
D O I
10.24200/sci.2018.20695
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
One of the most important parameters in designing sewer structures is the ability to accurately simulate their discharge and velocity field. Among the various sewer receiving inflow methods, open-channel junctions are the most frequently utilized ones. Because of the existence of separation and contraction zones in the open-channel junctions, the fluid flow has a complex behavior. Modeling is carried out by Radial Basis Function (RBF) neural network, Gene Expression Programming (GEP), and Multiple Non-Linear Regression (MNLR) methods. Finding the optimum situation for GEP and RBF models is done by examining various mathematical and linking functions for GEP, different numbers of hidden neurons, and various spread amounts for RBF. In order to use the models in practical situations, three equations were conducted by using the RBF, GEP, and MNLR methods in modeling the longitudinal velocity. Then, the surface integral of the presented equations was used to simulate the flow discharge. The results showed that the GEP and RBF methods performed significantly better than the MNLR in open-channel junction characteristics simulations. The GEP method had better performance than the RBF in modeling the longitudinal velocity field. However, the RBF presented more reliable results in the discharge simulations. © 2019 Sharif University of Technology. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:178 / 187
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Simulation of 3D flow using numerical model at open-channel confluences
    Goudarzizadeh, R.
    Mousavi Jahromi, S.H.
    Hedayat, N.
    World Academy of Science, Engineering and Technology, 2010, 71 : 650 - 655
  • [32] Simulation of 3D flow using numerical model at open-channel confluences
    Goudarzizadeh, R.
    Mousavi Jahromi, S.H.
    Hedayat, N.
    World Academy of Science, Engineering and Technology, 2010, 47 : 650 - 655
  • [33] An Artificial Compressibility Method for 1D Simulation of Open-Channel and Pressurized-Pipe Flow
    Hodges, Ben R.
    WATER, 2020, 12 (06)
  • [34] Experimental comparison of dividing open-channel with duct flow in T-junction
    Barkdoll, B.D.
    Hagen, B.L.
    Odgaard, A.J.
    Journal of Hydraulic Engineering, 1998, 124 (01): : 92 - 95
  • [35] Experimental comparison of dividing open-channel with duct flow in T-junction
    Barkdoll, BD
    Hagen, BL
    Odgaard, AJ
    JOURNAL OF HYDRAULIC ENGINEERING-ASCE, 1998, 124 (01): : 92 - 95
  • [36] Smoother Than Smooth: Increasing the Flow Conveyance of an Open-Channel Flow by Using Drag Reduction Methods
    Mignot, Emmanuel
    Riviere, Nicolas
    Lefevre, Arnaud
    Quillien, Bernard
    JOURNAL OF HYDRAULIC ENGINEERING, 2019, 145 (04)
  • [37] Spatiotemporal stochastic open-channel flow .2. Simulation experiments
    Gates, TK
    AlZahrani, MA
    JOURNAL OF HYDRAULIC ENGINEERING-ASCE, 1996, 122 (11): : 652 - 661
  • [38] Spatiotemporal stochastic open-channel flow. II: simulation experiments
    Civil Eng Dept, Colorado State Univ, Fort Collins CO 80523, United States
    J Hydraul Eng, 11 (652-661):
  • [39] Large-eddy simulation of a mildly curved open-channel flow
    Van Balen, W.
    Uijttewaal, W. S. J.
    Blanckaert, K.
    JOURNAL OF FLUID MECHANICS, 2009, 630 : 413 - 442
  • [40] TURBULENT SIMULATION OF OPEN-CHANNEL FLOW AT LOW-REYNOLDS-NUMBER
    THOMAS, TG
    WILLIAMS, JJR
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HEAT AND MASS TRANSFER, 1995, 38 (02) : 259 - 266