Nurse-delivered sleep restriction therapy in primary care for adults with insomnia disorder: a mixed-methods process evaluation

被引:0
|
作者
Armstrong, Stephanie [1 ]
Pattinson, Julie [1 ]
Siriwardena, Aloysius Niroshan [1 ,7 ]
Kyle, Simon [1 ]
Bower, Peter [2 ,3 ]
Yu, Ly-Mee [4 ]
Yang, Yaling
Ogburn, Emma [4 ]
Begum, Nargis [4 ]
Maurer, Leonie [5 ]
Robinson, Barbara [4 ]
Gardner, Caroline [5 ,6 ]
Lee, Victoria [5 ]
Gavriloff, Dimitri
Espie, Colin A. [1 ]
Aveyard, Paul [1 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Oxford, Sleep & Circadian Neurosci Inst, Nuffield Dept Clin Neurosci, Oxford, England
[2] Univ Manchester, NIH, Ctr Primary Care, Manchester, England
[3] Univ Manchester, Care Res Sch Primary Care Res, Manchester, England
[4] Univ Oxford, Nuffield Dept Primary Care Hlth Sci, Behav Med, Oxford, England
[5] Univ Manchester, Ctr Primary Care & Hlth Serv Res, Manchester, England
[6] GmbH, Leipzig, Germany
[7] Univ Lincoln, Sch Hlth & Social Care, Community & Hlth Res Unit, Ross Lucas Med Sci Bldg, Lincoln LN6 7TS, England
来源
BRITISH JOURNAL OF GENERAL PRACTICE | 2024年 / 74卷 / 738期
关键词
cognitive behavior therapy; general practice; insomnia disorder; nursing primary care; programme evaluation;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Background Sleep restriction therapy (SRT) is a behavioural therapy for insomnia. Aim To conduct a process evaluation of a randomised controlled trial comparing SRT delivered by primary care nurses plus a sleep hygiene booklet with the sleep hygiene booklet only for adults with insomnia disorder. Design and setting A mixed -methods process evaluation in a general practice setting. Method Semi -structured interviews were conducted in a purposive sample of patients receiving SRT, the practice nurses who delivered the therapy, and also GPs or practice managers at the participating practices. Qualitative data were explored using framework analysis, and integrated with nurse comments and quantitative data, including baseline Insomnia Severity Index score and serial sleep efficiency outcomes to investigate the relationships between these. Results In total, 16 patients, 13 nurses, six practice managers, and one GP were interviewed. Patients had no previous experience of behavioural therapy, needed flexible appointment times, and preferred face-to-face consultations; nurses felt prepared to deliver SRT, accommodating patient concerns, tailoring therapy, and negotiating sleep timings despite treatment complexity and delays between training and intervention delivery. How the intervention produced change was explored, including patient and nurse interactions and patient responses to SRT. Difficulties maintaining SRT, negative attitudes towards treatment, and low self -efficacy were highlighted. Contextual factors, including freeing GP time, time constraints, and conflicting priorities for nurses, with suggestions for alternative delivery options, were raised. Participants who found SRT a positive process showed improvements in sleep efficiency, whereas those who struggled did not. Conclusion SRT was successfully delivered by practice nurses and was generally well received by patients, despite some difficulties delivering and applying the intervention in practice
引用
收藏
页码:E34 / E40
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Feasibility study for supporting medication adherence for adults with cystic fibrosis: mixed-methods process evaluation
    Hind, Daniel
    Drabble, Sarah J.
    Arden, Madelynne A.
    Mandefield, Laura
    Waterhouse, Simon
    Maguire, Chin
    Cantrill, Hannah
    Robinson, Louisa
    Beever, Daniel
    Scott, Alex
    Keating, Sam
    Hutchings, Marlene
    Bradley, Judy
    Nightingale, Julia
    Allenby, Mark, I
    Dewar, Jane
    Whelan, Pauline
    Ainsworth, John
    Walters, Stephen J.
    Wildman, Martin J.
    O'Cathain, Alicia
    BMJ OPEN, 2020, 10 (10):
  • [32] Natural language processing in mixed-methods evaluation of a digital sleep-alcohol intervention for young adults
    Griffith, Frances J.
    Ash, Garrett I.
    Augustine, Madilyn
    Latimer, Leah
    Verne, Naomi
    Redeker, Nancy S.
    O'Malley, Stephanie S.
    Demartini, Kelly S.
    Fucito, Lisa M.
    NPJ DIGITAL MEDICINE, 2024, 7 (01):
  • [33] Experiences of German health care professionals with spiritual history taking in primary care: a mixed-methods process evaluation of the HoPES3 intervention
    Huperz, Carolin
    Sturm, Noemi
    Frick, Eckhard
    Maechler, Ruth
    Stolz, Regina
    Schalhorn, Friederike
    Valentini, Jan
    Joos, Stefanie
    Strassner, Cornelia
    FAMILY PRACTICE, 2023, 40 (02) : 369 - 376
  • [34] Implementing a hybrid cognitive-behavioural therapy for pain-related insomnia in primary care: lessons learnt from a mixed-methods feasibility study
    Tang, Nicole K. Y.
    Moore, Corran
    Parsons, Helen
    Sandhu, Harbinder Kaur
    Patel, Shilpa
    Ellard, David R.
    Nichols, Vivien P.
    Madan, Jason
    Collard, Victoria Elizabeth Janet
    Sharma, Uma
    Underwood, Martin
    BMJ OPEN, 2020, 10 (03):
  • [35] A mixed-methods evaluation of home-based primary care in dementia within an integrated system
    Nguyen, Huong Q.
    Vallejo, Jessica D.
    Macias, Mayra
    Shiffman, Maricela Garcia
    Rosen, Romina
    Mowry, Velda
    Omotunde, Omotayo
    Hong, Benjamin
    Liu, In-Lu Amy
    Borson, Soo
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN GERIATRICS SOCIETY, 2022, 70 (04) : 1136 - 1146
  • [36] Universal-offer HIV testing in primary care: A mixed-methods evaluation of a pilot study
    Wenlock, Rhys
    Dhillon, Syra
    Perera, Sean
    Vera, Jaime
    Llewellyn, Carrie
    Dean, Gillian
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF STD & AIDS, 2024, 35 (04) : 280 - 286
  • [37] Sources of unsafe primary care for older adults: a mixed-methods analysis of patient safety incident reports
    Cooper, Alison
    Edwards, Adrian
    Williams, Huw
    Evans, Huw P.
    Avery, Anthony
    Hibbert, Peter
    Makeham, Meredith
    Sheikh, Aziz
    Donaldson, Liam J.
    Carson-Stevens, Andrew
    AGE AND AGEING, 2017, 46 (05) : 833 - 839
  • [38] Electronic care coordination systems for people with advanced progressive illness: a mixed-methods evaluation in Scottish primary care
    Finucane, Anne M.
    Davydaitis, Deborah
    Horseman, Zoe
    Carduff, Emma
    Baughan, Paul
    Tapsfield, Julia
    Spiller, Juliet A.
    Meade, Richard
    Lydon, Brigid
    Thompson, Ian M.
    Boyd, Kirsty J.
    Murray, Scott A.
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF GENERAL PRACTICE, 2020, 70 (690): : E20 - E28
  • [39] A Mixed-Methods Evaluation of CARE (Cancer and Rehabilitation Exercise): A Physical Activity and Health Intervention, Delivered in a Community Football Trust
    Rutherford, Zoe
    Zwolinsky, Stephen
    Kime, Nicky
    Pringle, Andy
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH, 2021, 18 (06)
  • [40] Multifaceted intervention to increase the delivery of alcohol brief interventions in primary care: a mixed-methods process analysis
    Sturgiss, Elizabeth
    Advocat, Jenny
    Lam, Tina
    Nielsen, Suzanne
    Ball, Lauren
    Gunatillaka, Nilakshi
    Martin, Catherine
    Barton, Chris
    Tam, Chun Wah Michael
    Skouteris, Helen
    Mazza, Danielle
    Russell, Grant
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF GENERAL PRACTICE, 2023, 73 (735): : e778 - e788