Implementation of a group- based lifestyle intervention programme (Healthy Heart) in general practices in The Netherlands: a mixed-methods study

被引:0
|
作者
Smit, Anne K. [1 ]
Vos, Rimke C. [1 ]
Bijl, Rozemarijn W. [1 ]
Busch, Karin J. G. [2 ]
Verkleij, Sanne M. [1 ]
Kiefte-de Jong, Jessica C. [1 ]
Numans, Mattijs E. [1 ]
Bonten, Tobias N. [1 ]
机构
[1] Leiden Univ Med Ctr, Dept Publ Hlth & Primary Care V0P, Leiden, Netherlands
[2] Primary Care Grp Hague Hadoks, The Hague, Netherlands
关键词
mixed methods; general practice; lifestyle intervention programme; life style; implementation; group-based intervention; cardiovascular diseases; EXPERIENCES; REDUCTION; OBESITY;
D O I
10.3399/BJGPO.2023.0064
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Background: Lifestyle intervention programmes target behavioural risk factors that contribute to cardiovascular diseases (CVDs). Unfortunately, sustainable implementation of these programmes can be challenging. Gaining insights into the barriers and facilitators for successful implementation is important for maximising public health impact of these interventions. The Healthy Heart (HH) programme is an example of a combined lifestyle intervention programme. Aim: To analyse the reach, adoption, and implementation of the HH programme. Design & setting: A mixed- methods study conducted in a general practice setting in The Netherlands. Method: Quantitative data were collected from the Healthy Heart study (HH study), a non-randomised cluster stepped- wedge trial to assess the effect of the HH programme on patients at high risk of developing CVDs at practice level. Qualitative data were obtained through focus groups. Results: Out of 73 approached general practices, 55 implemented the HH programme. A total of 1082 patients agreed to participate in the HH study, of whom 64 patients were referred to the HH programme and 41 patients participated. Several barriers for participation were identified such as time investment, lack of risk perception, and being confident in changing lifestyle on their own. Important barriers for healthcare providers (HCPs) to refer a patient were time investment, lack of information to sufficiently inform patients, and preconceived notions regarding which patients the programme was suitable for. Conclusion: This study has offered insights from a patient and HCP perspective regarding barriers and facilitators for implementation of the group- based lifestyle intervention programme. The identified barriers and facilitators, and the suggested improvements, can be used by others who wish to implement a similar programme.
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Is group- based upper limb therapy for stroke patients feasible in an acute setting? A mixed methods study
    Kearney, Jessica
    Marston, Celia
    Thompson, Eloise
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF STROKE, 2023, 18 (02) : 42 - 42
  • [42] Feasibility of implementing routine nutritional screening for older adults in Australian general practices: a mixed-methods study
    Hamirudin, Aliza Haslinda
    Charlton, Karen
    Walton, Karen
    Bonney, Andrew
    Potter, Jan
    Milosavljevic, Marianna
    Hodgkins, Adam
    Albert, George
    Ghosh, Abhijeet
    Dalley, Andrew
    BMC FAMILY PRACTICE, 2014, 15
  • [43] Experiences with tailoring of primary diabetes care in well-organised general practices: a mixed-methods study
    Sytske van Bruggen
    Marise J. Kasteleyn
    Simone P. Rauh
    Julia S. Meijer
    Karin J. G. Busch
    Mattijs E. Numans
    Niels H. Chavannes
    BMC Health Services Research, 21
  • [44] Feasibility of implementing routine nutritional screening for older adults in Australian general practices: a mixed-methods study
    Aliza Haslinda Hamirudin
    Karen Charlton
    Karen Walton
    Andrew Bonney
    Jan Potter
    Marianna Milosavljevic
    Adam Hodgkins
    George Albert
    Abhijeet Ghosh
    Andrew Dalley
    BMC Family Practice, 15
  • [45] The promotion of healthy breakfast and snacks based on the social marketing model: a mixed-methods study
    Mostafavi, Firoozeh
    Zamani-Alavijeh, Fereshteh
    Mansourian, Marjan
    Bastami, Fatemeh
    JOURNAL OF HEALTH POPULATION AND NUTRITION, 2021, 40 (01)
  • [46] Experiences with tailoring of primary diabetes care in well-organised general practices: a mixed-methods study
    van Bruggen, Sytske
    Kasteleyn, Marise J.
    Rauh, Simone P.
    Meijer, Julia S.
    Busch, Karin J. G.
    Numans, Mattijs E.
    Chavannes, Niels H.
    BMC HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH, 2021, 21 (01)
  • [47] Process evaluation in practice based research networks: a study protocol for a mixed-methods implementation study
    Sanftenberg, Linda
    Dreischulte, Tobias
    Haerdtlein, Annette
    Kosub, Helena
    Gagyor, Ildiko
    Kurotschka, Peter Konstantin
    Kuehlein, Thomas
    Burggraf, Larissa
    Eck, Stefanie
    Roos, Marco
    Gensichen, Jochen
    BMJ OPEN, 2023, 13 (07):
  • [48] The promotion of healthy breakfast and snacks based on the social marketing model: a mixed-methods study
    Firoozeh Mostafavi
    Fereshteh Zamani-Alavijeh
    Marjan Mansourian
    Fatemeh Bastami
    Journal of Health, Population and Nutrition, 40
  • [49] Integrating People, Context, and Technology in the Implementation of a Web-Based Intervention in Forensic Mental Health Care: Mixed-Methods Study
    Kip, Hanneke
    Sieverink, Floor
    Van Gemert-Pijnen, Lisette J. E. W. C.
    Bouman, Yvonne H. A.
    Kelders, Saskia M.
    JOURNAL OF MEDICAL INTERNET RESEARCH, 2020, 22 (05)
  • [50] Mindfulness-Based Intervention for People With Dementia and Their Partners: Results of a Mixed-Methods Study
    Berk, Lotte
    Warmenhoven, Franca
    Stiekema, Annemarie P. M.
    Van Oorsouw, Kim
    Van Os, Jim
    de Vugt, Marjolein
    Van Boxtel, Martin
    FRONTIERS IN AGING NEUROSCIENCE, 2019, 11