Human reliability analysis methods

被引：0

作者：

Yalcin, Esra ^{[1
]}

Altun Ciftcioglu, Gokcen ^{[2
]}

Guzel, Burcin ^{[3
]}

机构：

[1] Istanbul Gelisim Univ, Istanbul Gelisim Vocat Sch, Dept Occupat Hlth & Safety, Istanbul, Turkiye

[2] Marmara Univ, Fac Engn, Dept Chem Engn, Istanbul, Turkiye

[3] Minist Labour & Social Secur, Ankara, Turkiye

来源：

PAMUKKALE UNIVERSITY JOURNAL OF ENGINEERING SCIENCES-PAMUKKALE UNIVERSITESI MUHENDISLIK BILIMLERI DERGISI | 2024年 / 30卷 / 02期

关键词：

Human reliability analysis; Human error; Occupational safety and health; Human error probability; Human reliability; HUMAN ERROR PROBABILITIES; EVALUATE HUMAN ERROR; BAYESIAN NETWORK; COGNITIVE RELIABILITY; DATA-COLLECTION; MODIFIED CREAM; HEART METHOD; MARINE; MODEL; OPERATION;

D O I：

10.5505/pajes.2023.33958

中图分类号：

T [工业技术];

学科分类号：

08 ;

摘要：

Human error is one of the most important factors contributing to occupational accidents. Human Reliability Analysis (HRA) methods have been used successfully in many fields to determine the probability of errors contributing to such accidents, estimate the impact of their consequences, and develop error reduction strategies. In this study, it has described some HRA methods and their implementations in several fields, including maritime, aviation, railway, space, health, nuclear, petrochemical, and construction sectors. Examples are drawn from articles dealing with HRA issues listed in the Web of Science Core Collection database between 2012 and 2022. The relatively small number of HRA studies conducted in T & uuml;rkiye are found mainly in maritime applications. This review is intended to encourage the widespread use of HRA methods in all industries.

引用

页码：282 / 292

页数：11

共 50 条

[11] STATISTICAL METHODS IN RELIABILITY ANALYSIS
WIESEN, JM
ELECTRO-TECHNOLOGY, 1967, 79 (05): : 57 - &
[12] Comparison of methods for dependency determination between human failure events within human reliability analysis
Jožef Stefan Institute, Reactor Engineering Division, Jamova cesta 39, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia
Sci. Technol. Nucl. Install., 2008,
[13] HUMAN RELIABILITY ANALYSIS
不详
NUCLEAR SAFETY, 1976, 17 (03): : 315 - 326
[14] A comparison of the quantification aspects of human reliability analysis methods in nuclear power plants
Park, Jooyoung
Arigi, Awwal Mohammed
Kim, Jonghyun
ANNALS OF NUCLEAR ENERGY, 2019, 133 : 297 - 312
[15] A critical review of methods and models for evaluating organizational factors in Human Reliability Analysis
Alvarenga, M. A. B.
Frutuoso e Melo, P. F.
Fonseca, R. A.
PROGRESS IN NUCLEAR ENERGY, 2014, 75 : 25 - 41
[16] Survey of methods used to assess human reliability in the human factors reliability benchmark exercise
Poucet, A.
Reliability Engineering and System Safety, 1988, 22 (1-4): : 257 - 268
[17] Comparison of Standardized Plant Analysis Risk Human Reliability Analysis (SPAR-H) and Cognitive Reliability Error Analysis Methods (CREAM) in Quantifying Human Error in Nursing Practice
Mohammadfam, Iraj
Movafagh, Maryam
Bashirian, Saeid
IRANIAN JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH, 2016, 45 (03) : 401 - 402
[18] Usability of methods for estimating the reliability of task analysis methods
Schütte, M
QUALITY OF WORK AND PRODUCTS IN ENTERPRISES OF THE FUTURE, 2003, : 733 - 736
[19] Comparison of reliability worth analysis methods:: data analysis and elimination methods
Kivikko, K.
Makinen, A.
Jarventausta, P.
Silvast, A.
Heine, P.
Lehtonen, M.
IET GENERATION TRANSMISSION & DISTRIBUTION, 2008, 2 (03) : 321 - 329
[20] Asymptotic Analysis Methods for Structural Reliability
Zhao Guofan
China Ocean Engineering, 1995, (03) : 303 - 310

← 1 2 3 4 5 →