Large Language Models in Medical Education: Comparing ChatGPT- to Human-Generated Exam Questions

被引:20
|
作者
Laupichler, Matthias Carl [1 ,2 ]
Rother, Johanna Flora [1 ]
Kadow, Ilona C. Grunwald [3 ]
Ahmadi, Seifollah [3 ]
Raupach, Tobias [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Hosp Bonn, Inst Med Educ, Venusberg Campus 1, D-53127 Bonn, Germany
[2] Univ Bonn, Inst Psychol, Bonn, Germany
[3] Univ Bonn, Inst Physiol 2, Dept Med, Bonn, Germany
关键词
D O I
10.1097/ACM.0000000000005626
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
Problem Creating medical exam questions is time consuming, but well-written questions can be used for test-enhanced learning, which has been shown to have a positive effect on student learning. The automated generation of high-quality questions using large language models (LLMs), such as ChatGPT, would therefore be desirable. However, there are no current studies that compare students' performance on LLM-generated questions to questions developed by humans. Approach The authors compared student performance on questions generated by ChatGPT (LLM questions) with questions created by medical educators (human questions). Two sets of 25 multiple-choice questions (MCQs) were created, each with 5 answer options, 1 of which was correct. The first set of questions was written by an experienced medical educator, and the second set was created by ChatGPT 3.5 after the authors identified learning objectives and extracted some specifications from the human questions. Students answered all questions in random order in a formative paper-and-pencil test that was offered leading up to the final summative neurophysiology exam (summer 2023). For each question, students also indicated whether they thought it had been written by a human or ChatGPT. Outcomes The final data set consisted of 161 participants and 46 MCQs (25 human and 21 LLM questions). There was no statistically significant difference in item difficulty between the 2 question sets, but discriminatory power was statistically significantly higher in human than LLM questions (mean = .36, standard deviation [SD] = .09 vs mean = .24, SD = .14; P = .001). On average, students identified 57% of question sources (human or LLM) correctly. Next Steps Future research should replicate the study procedure in other contexts (e.g., other medical subjects, semesters, countries, and languages). In addition, the question of whether LLMs are suitable for generating different question types, such as key feature questions, should be investigated.
引用
收藏
页码:508 / 512
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Vox Populi, Vox ChatGPT: Large Language Models, Education and Democracy
    Zuber, Niina
    Gogoll, Jan
    PHILOSOPHIES, 2024, 9 (01)
  • [22] ChatGPT and large language models in orthopedics: from education and surgery to research
    Srijan Chatterjee
    Manojit Bhattacharya
    Soumen Pal
    Sang-Soo Lee
    Chiranjib Chakraborty
    Journal of Experimental Orthopaedics, 10
  • [23] Performance of Large Language Models on Medical Oncology Examination Questions
    Longwell, Jack B.
    Hirsch, Ian
    Binder, Fernando
    Conchas, Galileo Arturo Gonzalez
    Mau, Daniel
    Jang, Raymond
    Krishnan, Rahul G.
    Grant, Robert C.
    JAMA NETWORK OPEN, 2024, 7 (06) : e2417641
  • [24] Can large language models reason about medical questions?
    Lievin, Valentin
    Hother, Christoffer Egeberg
    Motzfeldt, Andreas Geert
    Winther, Ole
    PATTERNS, 2024, 5 (03):
  • [25] Formally comparing topic models and human-generated qualitative coding of physician mothers' experiences of workplace discrimination
    Miner, Adam S.
    Stewart, Sheridan A.
    Halley, Meghan C.
    Nelson, Laura K.
    Linos, Eleni
    BIG DATA & SOCIETY, 2023, 10 (01)
  • [26] Opportunities, challenges, and future directions of large language models, including ChatGPT in medical education: a systematic scoping review
    Xu, Xiaojun
    Chen, Yixiao
    Miao, Jing
    JOURNAL OF EDUCATIONAL EVALUATION FOR HEALTH PROFESSIONS, 2024, 21
  • [28] Generative AI, Large Language Models, and ChatGPT in Construction Education, Training, and Practice
    Jelodar, Mostafa Babaeian
    BUILDINGS, 2025, 15 (06)
  • [29] CHATGPT, MD: A PILOT STUDY UTILIZING LARGE LANGUAGE MODELS TO WRITE MEDICAL ABSTRACTS
    Holland, A.
    Lorenz, W.
    Cavanaugh, J.
    Ayuso, S.
    Scarola, G.
    Jorgensen, L.
    Kercher, K.
    Smart, N.
    Fischer, J.
    Janis, J.
    Heniford, B. T.
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2024, 111
  • [30] Variability in Large Language Models' Responses to Medical Licensing and Certification Examinations. Comment on "How Does ChatGPT Perform on the United States Medical Licensing Examination? The Implications of Large Language Models for Medical Education and Knowledge Assessment"
    Epstein, Richard H.
    Dexter, Franklin
    JMIR MEDICAL EDUCATION, 2023, 9