The effectiveness and outcomes of epidural analgesia in patients undergoing open liver resection: a propensity score matching analysis

被引:1
|
作者
Pianngarn, Isarapong [1 ]
Lapisatepun, Worakitti [2 ,3 ]
Kulpanun, Maytinee [1 ]
Chotirosniramit, Anon [2 ,3 ]
Junrungsee, Sunhawit [2 ,3 ]
Lapisatepun, Warangkana [1 ]
机构
[1] Chiang Mai Univ, Fac Med, Dept Anesthesiol, 110 Inthawarorot Rd, Chiang Mai 50200, Thailand
[2] Chiang Mai Univ, Fac Med, Dept Surg, Div Hepatobilliary Pancreat Surg, 110 Inthawarorot Rd, Chiang Mai 50200, Thailand
[3] Chiang Mai Univ, Clin Surg Res Ctr, 110 Inthawarorot Rd, Chiang Mai 50200, Thailand
来源
BMC ANESTHESIOLOGY | 2024年 / 24卷 / 01期
关键词
Epidural analgesia; Open liver resection; Effectiveness and safety; Opioid consumption; Propensity score matching; RISK-FACTORS; POSTOPERATIVE COAGULOPATHY; HEPATIC RESECTION; PAIN RELIEF; ANESTHESIA; HEMATOMA; SURGERY; TRIAL;
D O I
10.1186/s12871-024-02697-1
中图分类号
R614 [麻醉学];
学科分类号
100217 ;
摘要
Background Open liver resection necessitates a substantial upper abdominal inverted-L incision, resulting in severe pain and compromising patient recovery. Despite the efficacy of epidural analgesia in providing adequate postoperative analgesia, the potential epidural-related adverse effects should be carefully considered. This study aims to compare the efficacy and safety of continuous epidural analgesia and intravenous analgesia in open liver resection. Methods A retrospective study was conducted, collecting data from patients who underwent open liver resection between 2007 and 2017. Propensity score matching was implemented to mitigate confounding variables, with patients being matched in a 1:1 ratio based on propensity scores. The primary outcome was the comparison of postoperative morphine consumption at 24, 48, and 72 hours between the two groups. Secondary outcomes included pain scores, postoperative outcomes, and epidural-related adverse effects. Results A total of 612 patients were included, and after matching, there were 204 patients in each group. Opioid consumption at 24, 48, and 72 hours postoperatively was statistically lower in the epidural analgesia group compared to the intravenous analgesia group (p < 0.001). However, there was no significant difference in pain scores (p = 0.422). Additionally, perioperative hypotension requiring treatment, as well as nausea and vomiting, were significantly higher in the epidural analgesia group compared to the intravenous analgesia group (p < 0.001). Conclusions Epidural analgesia is superior to intravenous morphine in terms of reducing postoperative opioid consumption within the initial 72 h after open liver resection. Nevertheless, perioperative hypotension, which necessitates management, should be approached with consideration and vigilance. Trial registration The study was registered in the Clinical Trials Registry at www.clinicaltrials.gov/, NCT number: NCT06301932.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Prognostic significance of the Naples prognostic score in colorectal cancer patients undergoing curative resection: a propensity score matching analysis
    Atsushi Sugimoto
    Tatsunari Fukuoka
    Masatsune Shibutani
    Hiroaki Kasashima
    Kishu Kitayama
    Masaichi Ohira
    Kiyoshi Maeda
    BMC Gastroenterology, 23
  • [22] Prognostic significance of the Naples prognostic score in colorectal cancer patients undergoing curative resection: a propensity score matching analysis
    Sugimoto, Atsushi
    Fukuoka, Tatsunari
    Shibutani, Masatsune
    Kasashima, Hiroaki
    Kitayama, Kishu
    Ohira, Masaichi
    Maeda, Kiyoshi
    BMC GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2023, 23 (01)
  • [23] Laparoscopy Decreases Pulmonary Complications in Patients Undergoing Major Liver Resection A Propensity Score Analysis
    Fuks, David
    Cauchy, Francois
    Fteriche, Samir
    Nomi, Takeo
    Schwarz, Lilian
    Dokmak, Safi
    Scatton, Olivier
    Fusco, Grazia
    Belghiti, Jacques
    Gayet, Brice
    Soubrane, Olivier
    ANNALS OF SURGERY, 2016, 263 (02) : 353 - 361
  • [24] Comparative outcomes of laparoscopic and open major liver resection using benchmark article method and propensity score matching method
    Guro, Hanisah
    Cho, Jai Young
    Han, Ho Seong
    Seok, Yoon Yoo
    Choi, Youngrok
    Lee, Boram
    Jeong, Sook-Hyang
    Kim, Jin-Wook
    Jang, Eun Sun
    Choi, Gwang Hyeon
    JOURNAL OF HEPATOLOGY, 2020, 73 : S901 - S901
  • [25] Comparison of laparoscopic versus open liver resection for colorectal liver metastases using propensity score matching
    Beppu, Toru
    Imai, Katsunori
    Sakamoto, Yasuo
    Miyamoto, Yuji
    Baba, Hideo
    ANNALS OF LAPAROSCOPIC AND ENDOSCOPIC SURGERY, 2016, 1
  • [26] Propensity score-based analysis of outcomes of laparoscopic versus open liver resection for colorectal metastases
    Cipriani, F.
    Rawashdeh, M.
    Stanton, L.
    Armstrong, T.
    Takhar, A.
    Pearce, N. W.
    Primrose, J.
    Abu Hilal, M.
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2016, 103 (11) : 1504 - 1512
  • [27] Robotic, laparoscopic, and open liver resection for hepatocellular carcinoma: A propensity score matched analysis of perioperative outcomes
    'Connell, R. M.
    Bucheeri, M.
    Quidwai, O.
    Bourke, M.
    Gallagher, Tk
    Hoti, E.
    SURGERY IN PRACTICE AND SCIENCE, 2023, 14
  • [28] The impact of liver resection on survival outcomes of hepatocellular carcinoma patients with extrahepatic metastases: A propensity score matching study
    Mao, Kai
    Yan, Yongcong
    Zhang, Jianlong
    Wang, Jie
    Wang, Ruomei
    Ling, Xiaojuan
    Liu, Yingyue
    Lau, Wan Yee
    Jiang, Shuai
    Liu, Jieqiong
    Xiao, Zhiyu
    CANCER MEDICINE, 2018, 7 (09): : 4475 - 4484
  • [29] Comparison of clinical and economic outcomes between minimally invasive liver resection and open liver resection: a propensity-score matched analysis
    Wei, David
    Johnston, Stephen
    Patkar, Anuprita
    Buell, Joseph F.
    HPB, 2021, 23 (05) : 785 - 794
  • [30] Operative and short-term oncologic outcomes of laparoscopic versus open liver resection for colorectal liver metastases located in the posterosuperior liver: a propensity score matching analysis
    Masayuki Okuno
    Claire Goumard
    Takashi Mizuno
    Kiyohiko Omichi
    Ching-Wei D. Tzeng
    Yun Shin Chun
    Thomas A. Aloia
    Jason B. Fleming
    Jeffrey E. Lee
    Jean-Nicolas Vauthey
    Claudius Conrad
    Surgical Endoscopy, 2018, 32 : 1776 - 1786