Influence of slit asymmetry on blow-off and flashback in methane/hydrogen laminar premixed burners

被引:6
|
作者
Pers, H. [1 ,2 ]
Masset, P. A. [1 ,3 ]
Flores-Montoya, E. [1 ]
Selle, L. [1 ]
Schuller, T. [1 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Toulouse, Inst Mecan Fluides Toulouse IMFT, CNRS, Toulouse, France
[2] SERMETA, Hydrogen Res & Dev Lab, Morlaix, France
[3] Univ Paris Saclay, Serv Thermo Hydraul & Mecan Fluides, CEA, Gif Sur Yvette, France
[4] Inst Univ France IUF, Paris, France
基金
欧盟地平线“2020”;
关键词
Fuel flexibility; Perforated plate; Hydrogen substitution; Domestic burner; Asymmetry; Flame-wall interaction; QUENCHING DISTANCE; FLAMES; HYDROGEN; SIMULATIONS; STABILITY; GAS; STABILIZATION; MECHANISMS; MIXTURES; METHANE;
D O I
10.1016/j.combustflame.2024.113413
中图分类号
O414.1 [热力学];
学科分类号
摘要
One way to decarbonize the heat production sector is to gradually replace natural gas with hydrogen. The design of laminar premixed burners capable of operating with both methane and hydrogen is however challenging as these fuels have drastically different burning properties, which narrows the operating range. While methane flames face limitations in stabilization due to blow -off at high power, hydrogen flames tend to be susceptible to flashback at low power. This study investigates the effects of slits symmetry breaking on the blow -off of methane flames and flashback of hydrogen flames through two-dimensional direct numerical simulations of canonical asymmetrical slit configurations, revealing uneven interactions between the main openings and smaller auxiliary slits. The equations governing the reactive flow dynamics are coupled to a heat transfer solver in the solid phase to elucidate the thermal and hydrodynamic mechanisms determining the operability limits. Viscous dissipation in the small auxiliary slits together with a substantial preheating of the fresh gases by heat redistribution through the solid phase is found to govern flame stabilization in asymmetrical geometries, improving blow -off resistance of methane -air flames. Then, flashback of hydrogenair flame is found to be driven by the competition between (i) the mass flow rate distribution between the main and auxiliary slits, (ii) preheating of the gas through the auxiliary slits and (iii) the ability of the main and auxiliary slits to quench the flame. The interplay of these phenomena gives rise to complex behaviors, wherein asymmetrical configurations could exhibit significantly enhanced resistance to flashback compared to symmetrical geometries. This conclusion, verified for different burner thicknesses and slit spacing, may be used to guide the design of fuel -flexible laminar burners. Novelty and significance statement 1. Analyzing the effect of slits symmetry breaking on blow -off of methane flames and flashback of hydrogen flames for multi -perforated laminar burners. 2. Defining a strategy for wall heat flux redistribution to assess the asymmetrical interaction between the main and auxiliary flames through the flame -holder. 3. Demonstrating and explaining the positive impact of symmetry breaking on the blow -off resistance of methane flames. 4. Highlighting the substantial and non -monotonous impact of symmetry breaking on hydrogen flame flashback. 5. Identifying the interplay of thermal and hydrodynamic mechanisms in asymmetrical slits leading to improvement of flashback resistance for hydrogen -air flames compared to symmetrical configurations.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Experimental study on blow-off limit of a preheated and flame holder-stabilized laminar premixed flame
    Wan, Jianlong
    Zhao, Haibo
    CHEMICAL ENGINEERING SCIENCE, 2020, 223 (223)
  • [22] Modeling of confined and unconfined laminar premixed flames on slit and tube burners
    Mallens, RMM
    deLange, HC
    vandeVen, CHJ
    deGoey, LPH
    COMBUSTION SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 1995, 107 (4-6) : 387 - 401
  • [23] Explosive dynamics of bluff-body-stabilized lean premixed hydrogen flames at blow-off
    Kim, Yu Jeong
    Song, Wonsik
    Perez, Francisco E. Hernandez
    Im, Hong G.
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE COMBUSTION INSTITUTE, 2021, 38 (02) : 2265 - 2274
  • [24] Large Eddy Simulation on Blow-Off Limit of Methane and Hydrogen-Mixed Gas
    Zhou, Xirui
    Wang, Ping
    Zeng, Haixiang
    Zhang, Yang
    Prashant, Shrotriya
    Antonio, Ferrante
    Qi, Haotian
    Shanghai Jiaotong Daxue Xuebao/Journal of Shanghai Jiaotong University, 2022, 56 (05): : 635 - 647
  • [25] LAMINAR BOUNDARY-LAYER BLOW-OFF .2.
    KASSOY, DR
    JOURNAL OF FLUID MECHANICS, 1971, 48 (JUL28) : 209 - &
  • [26] STRUCTURE AND BLOW-OFF MECHANISM OF ROD-STABILIZED PREMIXED FLAME
    YAMAGUCHI, S
    OHIWA, N
    HASEGAWA, T
    COMBUSTION AND FLAME, 1985, 62 (01) : 31 - 41
  • [27] Measurements in turbulent premixed bluff body flames close to blow-off
    Kariuki, James
    Dawson, James R.
    Mastorakos, Epaminondas
    COMBUSTION AND FLAME, 2012, 159 (08) : 2589 - 2607
  • [28] Blow-off process of highly under-expanded hydrogen non-premixed jet flame
    Yamamoto, Shohei
    Sakatsume, Ryo
    Takeno, Keiji
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HYDROGEN ENERGY, 2018, 43 (10) : 5199 - 5205
  • [29] INFLUENCE OF COANDA EFFECT OF BLOW-OFF LIMIT
    FOX, JS
    SARKAR, F
    COMBUSTION SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 1972, 6 (1-2) : 51 - &
  • [30] Experimental assessment of the lean blow-off in a fully premixed annular combustor
    Ciardiello, R.
    Skiba, A. W.
    Gordon, R. L.
    Mastorakos, E.
    EXPERIMENTAL THERMAL AND FLUID SCIENCE, 2020, 112